tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post4100543929322943009..comments2023-08-22T11:08:35.711-07:00Comments on FERRET-FACED FASCIST FRIENDS: GUN RIGHTS VS. GUN CONTROL (Or, PROTECT YOUR TEETH TO SAVE YOUR TONGUE)Stephen T. McCarthyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comBlogger38125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-12553477641797816212013-01-19T13:45:13.165-08:002013-01-19T13:45:13.165-08:00DOCTOR DISCDUDE ~
Of course the Americonned sheepl...DOCTOR DISCDUDE ~<br />Of course the Americonned sheeple have been so dumbed down that many of them can't even get to second base in thinking about this issue. (Second Base: WHY have these mass shootings become so common when they were so rare just three or four decades ago?) <br /><br />The sheeple have not been taught any skill whatsoever in 'Critical Thinking', so they immediately go from "Mass Shootings" to "Gun Confiscation" in their 100-pound weakling minds.<br /><br />But don't they look cool in all their tattoos? <br /><br />~ D-FensDogg<br />'Loyal American Underground'Stephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-36463432791073155282013-01-19T10:02:17.872-08:002013-01-19T10:02:17.872-08:00Stephen-
My comment and your response are way up ...Stephen-<br /><br />My comment and your response are way up there (lotsa good discussion on this post), so most people reading this one will think "what the f@#k?"<br /><br />...but you may be onto something.<br /><br />Maybe we need to get the GUNS on medication!<br /><br />The answer was right in front of us all along!<br /><br />LCDiscConnectedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07013919800637508392noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-22311831948947420812013-01-18T20:11:52.201-08:002013-01-18T20:11:52.201-08:00MASTER SIG II ~
>> . . . all of the most im...<b>MASTER SIG II ~</b><br /><br /><i>>> . . . all of the most important physical evidence at the scene of the crime was quickly collected, quickly sold, and quickly put on a fast boat to China.</i><br /><br /><i><b>>> . . . No problem, you can just buy it back at Walmart.</b></i><br /><br />You know what's kinda 'funny'? After I typed that remark above about the 'fast boat to China', I had the idea to add one final sentence. This:<br /><br /><b>It's probably returning to us now in the form of children's toys.</b><br /><br />I even paused for several moments, thinking about whether or not I should add that sentence. Then, for whatever reason, I decided to just leave it 'as is'.<br /><br />Maybe my subconscious mind sent me the message, "Leave something witty for Sig to reply with."<br /><br />Ha! <br /><br />Regardless... how's that saying go? "Great minds stink alike"?<br /><br />~ D-FensDogg<br />'Loyal American Underground' <br /><br />POSTSCRIPT: Got the Email. Thanks! Replying coming... eventually.Stephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-82360810816678013142013-01-18T20:01:46.146-08:002013-01-18T20:01:46.146-08:00BR'ER MARC ~
>> . . . My nephew knew th...<b>BR'ER MARC ~</b><br /><br /><i>>> . . . My nephew knew the shooter. Hung out with him biking a year ago. I have told him for years he's hanging with people that are going to get him nowhere fast and if that ain't proof well then I don't know what is.</i><br /><br />WHOA! I should say so!<br /><br />That was a fine comment, Brother. Thanks for posting it here. (I'm always conscious of the fact that all this political stuffs is so completely tied in with the spiritual, with God's prophecies and His plans.) <br /><br />As for the recent leaps you've made in your spiritual understanding, I can only chalk it up to the fact that I prayed for you after that last Email. (Which I still haven't responded to, but have retained it in my InBox so I will not forget about it completely.) <br /><br />Yes, I'm sure that my prayers alone are responsible for your spiritual enlightenment recently. What else could it be? <br />[;-)<br /><br />Glad you liked 'THE HARBINGER'. That one has so many 'WOW!' moments in it.<br /><br />~ D-FensDogg<br />'Loyal American Underground'Stephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-37667269374132313642013-01-18T10:01:00.519-08:002013-01-18T10:01:00.519-08:00>>Well, really, there is no way of conductin...<i>>>Well, really, there is no way of conducting a fully informed forensic investigation since all of the most important physical evidence at the scene of the crime was quickly collected, quickly sold, and quickly put on a fast boat to China.</i><br /><br />No problem, you can just buy it back at Walmart. <br />SigToonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-11445002938086327772013-01-17T22:12:26.929-08:002013-01-17T22:12:26.929-08:00Stephen,
I don't live near that mall shoot...<br /> Stephen,<br /> I don't live near that mall shooting but I work by it too. A couple of blocks actually. I know people who were there that day, and lost one of my coworkers (though I didn't personally know her). It hit where I'm at pretty hard. As a matter of fact it hit me personally very hard. My nephew knew the shooter. Hung out with him biking a year ago. I have told him for years he's hanging with people that are going to get him nowhere fast and if that ain't proof well then I don't know what is. I can't personally imagine sending my child to school to never see them again because some a hole coward decided to slaughter five year olds. I mean how do you get there? Then I think, "wow I'm a lot closer to that guy on the righteous index than I am to God." At that point Jack Daniels starts looking pretty good (though I didn't). I also finished the Harbinger (great recommendation by the way) and I think the guy nailed it. I haven't double checked his research or anything. Doesn't matter too much, after all the old testament is for our learning (romans 15:4 if memory serves me correctly). Between the Harbinger, the gun shooting, the propagandists working on gun confiscation, and my putting the pieces together it's been a active few weeks for me. Just to think, one of our sins that we don't view as being all "that bad" is so far away from what God is that it really is that bad. I can only describe it as us being closer to being Hitler than being righteous. thank God we have a savior. What a merciful thing our savior did for us, and our father allowed his only begotten son to die a death he didn't deserve for us, people who are closer to Hitler than true righteousness. I think about the old testament prophets who over and over again were overwhelmed by Gods holiness and their own unrighteousness. Once they got a taste of how far away from God they truly were of their own accord over and over again it shows them humbled. I personally can't imagine. <br /><br /> I have been truly humbled the past month (nothing to do with the shootings) in a very positive and profound way. Not on knowledge I didn't know (I could always recite it) but knowledge that my heart is now beginning to truly understand. I asked God to help me make the next steps in my faith, and wow I wasn't ready for that one. Humbled is all I can describe it as. I have become very conscious in a very positive way of all my short comings and it has motivated me to truly START making the next step or two to becoming a better man. I'm not bad by man standards by any stretch, but man standards are not what is of interest to me. Anyway, you kinda get where I've been these past months. Poking around here time to time, but also spending more time reflecting. <br /><br /> Br'er Marc mousiemarchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10946780831209471709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-72528732829110550832013-01-17T20:49:53.929-08:002013-01-17T20:49:53.929-08:00MASTER SIG II ~
>> . . . Someone once wrote...<b>MASTER SIG II ~</b><br /><br /><i>>> . . . Someone once wrote, "I studied the subject of Joe McCarthy for years and years and years. I have on my bookshelves all of the A-List books published on him (yes, including the anti-McCarthy books, because I believe in studying the opposition’s viewpoints, too)." Gold I tell' ya!</i><br /><br />Oh, shee-it! Don’t tell me you’re paying attention to what THAT idiot says! I know the dude, man, and he’s a Maroon Cartoon. <br /><br /><i>>> . . . I heard Michael Ruppert say something like, "there is no point in conducting a forensic investigation at this point...</i><br /><br />Well, really, there is no way of conducting a fully informed forensic investigation since all of the most important physical evidence at the scene of the crime was quickly collected, quickly sold, and quickly put on a fast boat to China. <br /><br />Thanks for returning to explain your viewpoint, Brother. I appreciate it. <br /><br />PeaceToo,<br /><br />~ D-FensDogg <br />‘Loyal American Underground’ Stephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-65001741227041015672013-01-17T20:14:05.711-08:002013-01-17T20:14:05.711-08:00FARAWAYEYES ~
>> . . . that depiction of me...<b>FARAWAYEYES ~</b><br /><br /><i>>> . . . that depiction of me as a mass murderer was a little over the top.</i><br /><br />I hear ya! But, you notice how after I said something about him in my comment to you, he returned to say that he had been 'MISUNDERSTOOD'? These Libs, they're always just so misunderstood, aren't they?<br /><br /><i>>> . . . Apparently, I have got to get out of my own house to listen to an intelligent conversation. Sheesh!</i><br /><br />Ha! Yep. But as one of my "Magnificent Seven", you'll always be welcome to join the intelligent conversation that takes place on this blog.<br /><br />~ D-FensDogg<br />'Loyal American Underground'Stephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-79624414979866494172013-01-17T20:05:43.631-08:002013-01-17T20:05:43.631-08:00BR'ER MARC ~
Addendum:
Thanks for checking in...<b>BR'ER MARC ~<br />Addendum:</b><br /><br />Thanks for checking in and for the compliment. Something I meant to include in my response but momentarily forgot was this:<br /><br /><i>>> . . . It was written to protect you from dictators arising such as Stalin, Mao, and Hitler.</i><br /><br />That, of course, is the primary reason for the Second Amendment, and the principal argument for why our Second Amendment right should NEVER be reduced to the least-powerful handguns made. <br /><br />Reading so many blog articles lately as a result of the Sandy Hook shooting, one point seems to get repeated so frequently by pro-gun control commenters. <br /><br />They keep asking us pro-Second Amendment people what we're so afraid of. They say they can't even imagine what sort of unrealistic "holocaust" we could possibly be afraid of. They keep telling us that we are ridiculously, sadly, unnecessarily fearful of imaginary monsters (and claptrap like that).<br /><br />These well-meaning and peaceful Everyday Johns and Joans are convinced that our concerns are unfounded, suggesting that people like you and me and my other readers are somewhat paranoid.<br /><br />But, of course, the truth of the matter is that the pro-Second Amendment Everyday Johns and Joans who insist on "clinging to their guns" understand history far better than their opponents do.<br /><br />We know that tyrannical governments have moved from gun registration to gun confiscation to tyranny and innocent deaths in the murdered millions. We also know that if given the chance, American tyrants would do the same damned things that their Russian, Chinese, and German counterparts did. <br /><br />The naive always think "It couldn't happen HERE", just before it does.<br /><br />And that's why, when I sat down to compose this blog bit, I decided rather than just talk about Second Amendment rights as a protection against some 'POSSIBLE' but 'IMPROBABLE' diabolical dictatorship in the faraway future, I would use some examples that bring it closer to home. <br /><br />I selected some information that would seem to indicate that our good ol' Uncle Sam may have some surprise in store for the naive pro-gun control crowd.<br /><br />There were plenty more examples I could have included (in fact, I coulda gone on all week with examples), but decided this was enough to make most reasonably intelligent people realize that maybe all of our concerns are not necessarily so unfounded after all.<br /><br />~ D-FensDogg<br />'Loyal American Underground'Stephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-17538337508331693552013-01-17T19:33:00.883-08:002013-01-17T19:33:00.883-08:00DiscConnected ~
Thanks for the kudos!
Yeah, guns ...<b>DiscConnected ~</b><br />Thanks for the kudos! <br />Yeah, guns be guns (or should that be "guns r guns"?), and they've always been (were?) guns. Guns haven't changed. So why are they now killing so many people in public places as a result of senseless shootings?<br /><br />I think it's time we reasoned with the guns and maybe enrolled them in some sort of anger management courses. <br /><br />Either that or STOP DOPING EVERYONE UP on psychiatric drugs with their deadly side effects. <br /><br />One or both of those remedies ought to be beneficial to our communities.<br /><br /><br /><b>BR'ER MARC ~</b><br />Righty-O, my friend! <br /><br />I did not know you live so close to where that mall shooting occurred. <br /><br /><i>>> . . . It was written to protect you from dictators arising such as Stalin, Mao, and Hitler.</i><br /><br />That's a little harsh, don't you think? I mean even megamurderers need peas, love and understanding.<br /><br /><i>>> . . . Read what our founders said in the federalist and anti federalist papers about our constitution. Read the Bible!</i><br /><br />Yeah. Either that or read Time magazine, The New York Times newspaper, and listen to NPR. Education is so vital to a healthy society.<br /><br />~ D-FensDogg<br />'Loyal American Underground'Stephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-51303518871605897892013-01-17T19:15:28.328-08:002013-01-17T19:15:28.328-08:00I know that you know how lucky you are to have the...I know that you know how lucky you are to have the type of friend/followers that you do. TODAY, let me say out loud, in your space, I'll trade about 250 of mine for your Magnificent 7 or probably I should say 6.<br /><br />What a load of horse puckey got dropped on my site today. I knew I had the potential to 'take a beating' but that depiction of me as a mass murderer was a little over the top.<br /><br />Apparently, I have got to get out of my own house to listen to an intelligent conversation. Sheesh!farawayeyeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17578277501054242356noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-74520753202775282702013-01-17T09:31:08.418-08:002013-01-17T09:31:08.418-08:00STM,
Regarding the events of 9/11, we agree much ... STM,<br /><br />Regarding the events of 9/11, we agree much more than we disagree. Someone once wrote, <br /><br />"I studied the subject of Joe McCarthy for years and years and years. I have on my bookshelves all of the A-List books published on him (yes, including the anti-McCarthy books, because I believe in studying the opposition’s viewpoints, too)."<br /><br />Gold I tell'ya! Admittedly, there's plenty still "blowing in the wind" when the subject of 9/11 come up in discussion, at least in my mind. We can debate the presence of molecule 1,3-diphenlypropane, sulfur, potassium, titanium, manganese; all components in various forms of thermite, thermate, paper thermite, sol-gel thermite, or super thermite and also found in normal everyday construction materials and computer components. Or, try to determine the effects of 45,000 tons compressing a weakened lightweight perimeter tube frame design. It doesn't matter. We are both on the outside looking in, and we both seek the truth. <br /><br />I'm only interested in the macro view at this point. Why did the event take place and who was behind it; and I believe those answers will be found nowhere near ground zero. The evidence captured at the WTC and D.C., both captured on video and through scientific study are done. The 9/11 Commission completed their illusion of due diligence. <br /><br />I heard Michael Ruppert say something like, "there is no point in conducting a forensic investigation at this point, someone on the inside knows what went on, and getting them to talk should be the focus." Not a direct quote and he was referring to the financial side of the 9/11 issue. I hope he is right. <br /> <br />Peace,<br />SigToo<br /> SigToonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-62922934022348840412013-01-16T23:41:46.513-08:002013-01-16T23:41:46.513-08:00Brother,
You did a great job here. I'm goi...<br /> Brother,<br /> You did a great job here. I'm going to now address anyone who might come by here years from now.<br /><br /> I have friends who were at the Oregon mall shooting. I have a quote on quote "special needs child" a number of which were ruthlessly murdered at Sandy Hoke. My own wife couldn't make it home from work due to the Oregon mall shooting. I was at that mall less than a week prior to the shooting with my two year old daughter in the very area that guy unloaded on those innocent people. So let me be the guy who first says let us all pray for those who lost their lives, and those who were emotionally harmed by this. <br /><br /> However, you have to have emotional intelligence here. Knee jerk feel good mandates are what the gun grabbing nazi's are all about. "We need to protect our children." And other quotes of absurd proportions. They could care less about your children. They want to disarm you, and enslave you. If you believe anything different you need to do some serious research. Governments who disarm their citizens will end up murdering them. Read history. I don't own a stock pile of guns. I don't know the first thing about using a semi automatic weapon. However, I would rather have my neighbor have one than soldiers marching down my street. Make no bones about it. Once your guns are gone your freedom is over. Criminals who don't have guns will find something else. A country of private law abiding citizens who don't have guns are lambs for the slaughter. The second amendment wasn't written for duck hunters and fisherman. It was written to protect you from dictators arising such as Stalin, Mao, and Hitler. Don't kid yourself people. Every government needs to fear it's citizens. It needs to know it can't just come in and "take over." Read what our founders said in the federalist and anti federalist papers about our constitution. Read the Bible!!! It's filled with the very same types of mistakes were making now, and it didn't work out so well for them. <br /><br /> Br'er Marc mousiemarchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10946780831209471709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-71728723533819175752013-01-16T22:03:03.819-08:002013-01-16T22:03:03.819-08:00OL' WP (or, MISTER BREEZE 2) ~
Hey, good to h...<b>OL' WP (or, MISTER BREEZE 2) ~</b><br /><br />Hey, good to hear from ya! Thanks for checking in. I hope all is well wid ya, Brother.<br /><br />It just so happens that I briefly mentioned you in a fairly recent blog bit. Here's the URL to it, if ya wanna take a look:<br /><br />http://xtremelyun-pcandunrepentant.blogspot.com/2012/11/magnificent-seven-im-really-thankful.html<br /><br />I hope your 2013 is a winner!<br /><br />Bless And Be Blessed.<br /><br />~ D-FensDogg<br />'Loyal American Underground'Stephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-62955641159773207692013-01-16T21:47:52.860-08:002013-01-16T21:47:52.860-08:00Stephen-
I have to come back and finish watching ...Stephen-<br /><br />I have to come back and finish watching the clips and reading the comments, but wanted to say kudos on the research into the effects of the drugs that are pumped into children like they are Flinstones vitamins.<br /><br />Americans have been so willing to let the government decide what's best for their kids in the class room abd in the medicine cabinet that they buy into the "ban guns" argument very easily and forget that there simply were not mass shootings fifty or sixty years ago.<br /><br />Well there was one mass shooting on a campus in Ohio in the early seventies, but that was either the Army or Neil Young....<br /><br />Uncle Obama has our schools and now our health care under his thumb.<br /><br />And people keep drinking the kool-aid...<br /><br />LC<br /><br />DiscConnectedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07013919800637508392noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-51039434084085635132013-01-16T21:42:26.416-08:002013-01-16T21:42:26.416-08:00Part 2 Of 2:
One last thing about Larry Silverst...Part 2 Of 2: <br /><br />One last thing about Larry Silverstein and the lease he held on the property:<br /><br />At, <br />http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/background/owners.html ,<br />the writer concluded his piece with a parable meant to illustrate what good fortune Larry Silverstein seemed to have when it came to his “loss” on 9/11. I only wish I had such good bad luck: <br /><br />A Parable:<br />To put these events in perspective, imagine that a person leases an expensive house, and immediately takes out an insurance policy covering the entire value of the house and specifically covering bomb attacks. Six weeks later two bombs go off in the house, separated by an hour. The house burns down, and the lessor immediately sues the insurance company to pay him twice the value of the house, and ultimately wins. The lessor also gets the city to dispose of the wreckage, excavate the site, and help him build a new house on the site.<br /><br />Too much curious timing leading to good luck, rare and bizarre circumstances, and poor word choices or misspeaking for me to accept the “official story” about Tower 7. In fact, the decision of the 9/11 Commission to ignore Tower 7 altogether in its final report on the 2001 tragedy speaks volumes to me about the nature of its collapse.<br /><br />I guess we’ll just have to disagree about that one. <br /><br /><i>>> . . . I actually think more Americans understand and agree with that. … Maybe alternative new websites, blogs, books like Griffin's that are gaining popularity and are having an impact. (I think that was a hint of optimism.)</i><br /><br />Ha! <br />Well, I’m sure there’s truth to what you said there. When I first learned about the ‘NEW WORLD ORDER’, I could mention it to 100 people and it’s highly unlikely that even one of them would have been familiar with the phrase, let alone what it actually stands for.<br /><br />But now, I’m constantly being surprised by how many people seem to have become aware of it since 1994, due no doubt to the things you mentioned. In my last place of employment, I discovered in just a few months that at least two of the nurses and one of the pharmacists knew about the NWO. <br /><br />The fact that some people are beginning to wake up makes me wonder if “they” aren’t feeling pressure now to really accelerate the program and move us to the “checkmate” as soon as possible. If so, watch for new disasters and tragedies coming “Fast And Furious”. <br /><br />Thanks for the response, Bro.<br /><br />~ D-FensDogg<br />‘Loyal American Underground’Stephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-8699979182566635862013-01-16T21:42:11.260-08:002013-01-16T21:42:11.260-08:00Part 1 Of 2:
MASTER SIG II ~
Thanks. No rush, of...Part 1 Of 2:<br /><br /><b>MASTER SIG II ~</b><br /><br />Thanks. No rush, of course, on the Email response. Just <i>‘whenever’</i> will work.<br /><br /><i>>> . . . I'm going to try to I keep this under 1300 characters. You need to sleep sometime.</i><br /><br />I’ll sleep when I’m dead. <br /><br /><i>>> . . . the possibility of more extensive structural and fire damage on that side of the building that ultimately lead to the collapse. Silverstein's comment, in my opinion, is nothing more than a poor choice of words, or he misspoke.</i><br /><br />Alright, you’re starting to scare me a little bit. Who are you working for? Who are you REALLY, and what have you done with Sig? <br /><br />I jest, of course. But . . . - ahem – I think I need a little clarification on something, because I suddenly feel confused about where you’re coming from on 9/11. <br /><br />Are you saying that you believe the three buildings (WTC Towers 1, 2, and 7) all collapsed “controlled demolition-like” as a result of fires in them? [If so, then that’s the first and only time where skyscrapers fell in a matter of seconds (one or more of them at near free-fall speed) into their own footprints as a result of fires.]<br /><br />Or do you believe that Towers 1 and 2 were set with explosives prior to 9/11 and were brought down as controlled demolitions, but that Tower 7 really did fall as a result of the fires alone?<br /><br />Or are you saying something completely different from the two examples above? <br /><br />I’m bearing in mind the remark you made in a previous comment which seemed to indicate that you suspect a controlled demolition of SOMETHING: <br /><br /><b><i>>> . . . and thermite residue still waving in the breeze and more time passes eroding the possibility of uncovering the real truth.</i></b><br /><br />And, of course, what you said is true: Unexploded particles of some form of “super-thermite” was indeed discovered in nearby dust that resulted from the September 11th destruction. <br /><br />So I’m a little confused about what your general belief is regarding the Towers’ collapse.<br /><br />Continued Below...Stephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-71239045046244585842013-01-16T17:22:39.414-08:002013-01-16T17:22:39.414-08:00Wow Stephen, great read and I'm glad to see th...Wow Stephen, great read and I'm glad to see that you're still blogging. <br /><br />Being a CT resident and a concealed permit holder here since 1989, the Sandy Hook incident, and the following "gun law craziness" has been something I've been following closely. <br /><br />Yes if you haven't guessed by now it's me, your old internet pal the WP. <br /><br />I knew you would have some enjoyable knowledge and opinion to read on the subject matter if you were still actively writing. So I decided to see if you were, and lo and behold here you still are. I knew you couldn't give it up. : )<br /><br />I'm glad that you popped into my head, and I gotta say...I MISSED YA MAN! <br /><br />Love and blessings to you my friend. Keep fighting the good fight.<br /><br />Your friend, and spiritual brother.<br /><br />WP><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-17568572973659817592013-01-16T09:31:30.499-08:002013-01-16T09:31:30.499-08:00STM,
First, I received your e-mail. Thanks for t...STM,<br /><br />First, I received your e-mail. Thanks for the reply, I'll get back. Secondly, I'm going to try to I keep this under 1300 characters. You need to sleep sometime.<br /><br />Regarding that poll that you conducted...let me guess, the person who said one building fell is from the temp agency, right?<br />__________________<br /><i>>>"Ahh, yes, but you forget that the World Trade Center Towers had ALSO survived a gorilla attack in 1976 (Jessica Lange and Jeff Bridges were eyewitnesses to it)." </i><br /><br />Pretty sure that was a guy in a monkey suit. Translation: Oh yeah, that's right!<br />____________________<br /><i>>>"What did Larry Silverstein mean when he said, “ ‘…maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.’ And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."?</i><br /><br /><i>>>"That is the subject of the blog installment ‘Silverstein Answers WTC Building 7 Charges’, which you can read by clicking HERE. Please see whatcha think." </i><br /><br /> I remember playing that clip of Silverstein over and over again to try to understand was he meant. Pull out, pull it, pull...demolition?, pull with cable?, pull what?. That was several years ago and I can see how it can be confusing and be interpreted more than just one way. You know that I think there are quite a few dirty deals regarding the events of 9/11, and Silverstein could be included in the mix. <br /><br />As for how WTC 7 fell, I still rely more heavily on the multiple accounts of the firefighters who were on the south side of WTC 7 and who were "pulled" from the area, and the possibility of more extensive structural and fire damage on that side of the building that ultimately lead to the collapse. Silverstein's comment, in my opinion, is nothing more than a poor choice of words, or he misspoke. He might have added the word "it" where it didn't belong sort of like Neil Armstrong forgot the word "a". <br /><br />With that said, you know you can't stop blogging. Cut the snakes head off and it grows seven more. See above paragraph...moon landing a hoax?, Israel a major player in the 9/11 attacks?<br />_____________________<br /><i>>>"Well, all my years of studying this conspiracy stuffs has led me to the wisdom of the following ‘starting point’ of any investigation into anything bad anywhere:<br />Consider ‘Uncle Sam’ guilty until he’s proven innocent beyond so much as a scintilla of doubt."</i><br /><br />I actually think more Americans understand and agree with that. Just seeing "The Creature..." smack dab in the center of the bookstore displayed for all to see a year or two ago must say something. I saw Ben Bernanke on a live web cast taking questions at a college in Michigan a few days ago. Do his "handlers" feel a need to promote a more transparent Fed?...or the illusion of. If so, why? Maybe alternative new websites, blogs, books like Griffin's that are gaining popularity and are having an impact. (I think that was a hint of optimism.)<br />_____________________<br /><i>>>You may possess all the factual ammo you need to easily win a civilized target-shooting contest, but sometimes, some topics are such hot-button issues that you’d almost rather decide the matter by hand-to-hand combat. It’s a more satisfying victory. You know what I mean?</i><br /><br />I do. I worked several years in middle-management which blows sometimes because you have to take it from both sides. I remember lambasting a salesman via e-mail and face to face. I got my point across for the moment, and it felt good, but I lost, and never regained, much needed support from others. Sometimes people stop hearing the words and hear only the emotion, and then the message gets lost. <br /><br /><i> “And I’m here TO TELL YOU, 1776 WILL COMMENCE AGAIN IF YOU TRY TO TAKE OUR FIREARMS!”</i><br /><br />I heard that.<br /> <br />SigToo<br />SigToonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-75454994825928974912013-01-15T22:12:46.358-08:002013-01-15T22:12:46.358-08:00Part 4 of 4:
>>... "Continuing coverag...Part 4 of 4:<br /><br /><i>>>... "Continuing coverage of this latest shooting rampage sponsored by ___________." (fill in your favorite drug company) Is that irony? I don't really know. I overuse "irony" like doctors over-prescribe drugs.</i><br /><br />Only you, man! <br />That is SO CREATIVE!!! <br /><br /><i>>>… From comment section in one of your responses: "I follow several alternative news sources in this country that are really excellent and shine a light on the dark underbelly of contemporary American government and society." <br />What are your top two?</i><br /><br />Hey, thanks for axing! (Leave Lizzy outta this!) <br /><br />I can’t give you my “top two”. I have to give you my top three, because each one supplies a slightly different general theme to their coverage, and all of them are important. Here you go (in no particular order, although I probably think to visit the first one first, most of the time)…<br /><br />WORLD NET DAILY:<br />(where I first learned of the book ‘The Harbinger’)<br />http://www.wnd.com/<br /><br />THE NEW AMERICAN website / magazine:<br />http://www.thenewamerican.com/<br /><br />UNFILTERED NEWS <br />(Go to G. Edward Griffin’s website, ‘Reality Zone’, then scroll down and click on the icon that signs you up to receive his free Emailed newsletter ‘Unfiltered News’. It will be Emailed to your InBox weekly and it is a collection of links to important news articles and video postings.)<br />http://www.realityzone.com/<br /><br />There are other sites I visit from time to time, but those are definitely The Big Three for me. <br /><br /><i>>>… SigTooMuch</i><br /><br />Never. <br />Fantabulous comments, Brother!<br /><br />No need to reply until you’ve got the time and the inclination, but… GOT EMAIL? <br /><br />~ D-FensDogg<br />‘Loyal American Underground’Stephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-33062717626162215392013-01-15T22:10:20.507-08:002013-01-15T22:10:20.507-08:00Part 3
Having participated in so many debates aga...Part 3<br /><br />Having participated in so many debates against strident Liberals through the years, I know that there sometimes comes a moment when, despite the fact I KNOW I could defeat them with completely accurate information, I really just want to kick their ass in a personal confrontation.<br /><br />I have rarely if ever chosen that approach myself, but sometimes Liberals have gone down that path with me, and when THEY have initiated it, there have been times when I’ve thought: THANK YOU FOR TAKING OFF THE GLOVES. “ALRIGHT, LUNGER, LET'S DO IT!”<br /><br />Sig, I don’t know if you’re aware of this (I may or may not have mentioned it on one of my blogs at some point), but I played football and wrestled in high school. Despite the poetry I wrote in my early twenties, there’s also a “contact sports”-mentality in me that occasionally still surfaces. So, I do “get” Alex Jones. You may possess all the factual ammo you need to easily win a civilized target-shooting contest, but sometimes, some topics are such hot-button issues that you’d almost rather decide the matter by hand-to-hand combat. It’s a more satisfying victory. You know what I mean? <br /><br /><i>>>... this blog bit is far more convincing and would do more to defend the 2nd Amendment if it had an audience of equal size.</i><br /><br />I truly thank you for saying that and I wish I agreed, but I don’t think I do. As one of the paragraphs in this blog bit stated, sometimes the season to reason has passed, and it’s time to FIGHT. I think that’s what Alex Jones was feeling in his Piers Morgan interview. <br /><br />In Part 2 of the interview, there’s a point where Jones flares-up and gets especially fiery, but it seemed a shade “calculated” to me. However, there’s a similar but totally authentic moment in Part 1 that pretty much made the hair stand up on my arms and the spirit within me leap. <br /><br />To my mind, Alex Jones won the entire debate, saying everything he really NEEDED to say in the first three and a half minutes, which was close to being a monologue. There was enough spot-on info in that first 3:30 to make any uninformed person who gives the slightest damn about America say, “WHAT?!”, and commence to Googling.<br /><br />But the truly greatest moment in the whole thing, in my opinion, occurred at the 2:15 mark, when ‘The American Spirit Of Rebellion’ against tyranny truly rose up in Alex Jones naturally, and in an unexpected flash of genuine anger he said to Piers Morgan: <b>“And I’m here TO TELL YOU, <i>1776 WILL COMMENCE AGAIN</i> IF YOU TRY TO TAKE OUR FIREARMS!”</b><br /><br />I see nothing but 100% sincerity in Alex Jones at that exact moment. We were talking above about whether or not there are any more great quotes. I’d say THAT ONE is a great quote. To me, the authentic passion I saw in Alex Jones when he said that, and the feeling it inspired within me while watching it, leads me to say that <b>“And I’m here TO TELL YOU, <i>1776 WILL COMMENCE AGAIN</i> IF YOU TRY TO TAKE OUR FIREARMS!”</b> is the 21st Century version of Patrick Henry’s, “I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!”<br /><br />It was that ‘REVOLUTIONARY JONES’ moment at the 2:15 point in Part 1 of the interview that convinced me I ought to post the video on my blog.<br /><br />Continued Below...Stephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-16834003186631705972013-01-15T22:05:21.355-08:002013-01-15T22:05:21.355-08:00Part 2:
First, please go back and watch again tha...Part 2:<br /><br />First, please go back and watch again that short (1:23) TOWER 7 video I posted above in my blog bit. You’ll see an excerpt from a documentary made a year after 9/11 in which WTC Tower 7 leaseholder, Larry Silverstein says:<br /><br />"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, ‘We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.’ And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."<br /><br />We all know that the controlled demolition of a building, causing it to fall into its own “footprint” to avoid damaging surrounding buildings, is a precise science that takes plenty of planning and plenty of thought. That’s why few people specialize in controlled demolitions and those who do make big bucks. <br /><br />So, it’s totally unrealistic for anyone to believe (and no one has ever suggested) that WTC Tower 7 was rigged for controlled demolition on Sept. 11th, while a few of its floors were burning (due to falling debris from WTC Tower 1) and there was smoke and rubble and people jumping from buildings everywhere. <br /><br />If WTC Tower 7 was a controlled demolition, it HAD to have been explosively rigged PRIOR to 9/11 (just like Towers 1 and 2). As the video shows, Tower 7 came down later in the day in the exact same manner that Towers 1 and 2 did earlier in the day, after being struck by airplanes. But Tower 7 was never struck by an airplane. <br /><br />What did Larry Silverstein mean when he said, <i><b>“ ‘…maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.’ And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."</b></i>? <br /><br />That is the subject of the blog installment ‘Silverstein Answers WTC Building 7 Charges’, which you can read by clicking <a href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2006/050106silversteinanswers.htm" rel="nofollow">HERE</a>. Please see whatcha think. <br /><br />As it says in the article:<br /><br /><b>Building 7 occupied a city block immediately north of the World Trade Center complex. Photos taken minutes before its collapse show small fires on two or three floors. Building 7 became only the third steel building in history before or since 9/11 to collapse from fire damage. The other two were the North and South towers of the World Trade Center.</b><br /><br /><i>>>… Actually, I would never have thought about questioning Sandy Hook, for instance, if you hadn't brought it up.</i><br /><br />Ha! Well, all my years of studying this conspiracy stuffs has led me to the wisdom of the following ‘starting point’ of any investigation into anything bad anywhere:<br /><br />Consider ‘Uncle Sam’ guilty until he’s proven innocent beyond so much as a scintilla of doubt.<br /><br /><i>>>… if [Alex Jones] is the de-facto spokesman for all gun-owning patriots in America, seems like he missed an opportunity to gain a larger following by deciding to rant his way through the "debate". … Unlike the Morgan-Jones exchange, this blog bit is far more convincing and would do more to defend the 2nd Amendment if it had an audience of equal size.</i><br /><br />I thank you so much for the compliment. And, for the record, I DO understand your opinion about the possible “shot-to-his-own-foot” approach that Alex Jones employed in his debate with Piers Morgan. It’s probably a valid point you make, from an intellectual angle, or from any other angle for that matter.<br /><br />But, at the same time, there’s an “angle” or “facet” of my own personality that not only understands Alex’s demeanor but appreciates and applauds it. <br /><br />Continued Below...Stephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-26927474147204852072013-01-15T22:02:48.093-08:002013-01-15T22:02:48.093-08:00Part 1:
MASTER SIG II ~
First, a huge “THANK YOU...Part 1:<br /><br /><b>MASTER SIG II ~</b><br /><br />First, a huge “THANK YOU” for the greatly appreciated compliment(s) and the “Double-Great” comment(s).<br /><br /><i>>>… That anti-gun sculpture is also anti-Constitution.</i><br /><br />Indeed. But would you expect anything less on Rockefeller property?<br /><br /><i>>>… Luckily for the artist, many Americans still respect the First Amendment as evidenced by the fact that no one has turned that Colt .45 into a snub-nose...and sold the excess scrap to make more guns.</i><br /><br />HA!-HA! Friggin’ BRILLIANT! <br />(<i>Siggin’</i> BRILLIANT?) <br />Only you, man!<br /><br /><i>>>… Where are all the great quotes today? Have they been banned? Or is that not fair because a certain amount of time must pass before great quotes become great quotes?</i><br /><br />That’s a good question. I do occasionally run across contemporary quotes that should someday be considered “classics”, but not many. <br /><br />I think there is something to be said for ‘The Test Of Time’. Ronald Reagan had some really good verbal moments that are now being repeated often. (But, of course, you know I don’t believe Reagan believed most of his best quotes; regardless of the words, he was one of “them”.) Have Reagan’s quotes passed ‘The Test Of Time’? How much time is needed? I still consider Reagan’s quotes to be at least semi-green in terms of time, but he DID say some good stuffs. (Speak classics but carry a rigged stick.) <br /><br /><i>>>… Was that a trick question? I would have said five...WTC1, WTC2, WTC3, WTC7, St. Nicholas Church.</i><br /><br />Ha! Only you, man! <br />No, it was not a trick question, but you raise a <i>good</i> question. Obviously, I assumed everyone would understand that I was asking how many buildings collapsed to the ground ON September 11th. But the assumption would definitely disqualify my question and responses in a “serious”, formal survey. <br /><br />Nonetheless, I can state confidently that had I phrased my question more specifically, it would not have altered the end result. I’m fairly certain that most if not all of the people I spoke with assumed the same thing I was assuming. But even if they weren’t, I could tell by their reactions that only ONE of the 15 had a clue about 9/11. <br /><br /><i>>>… I know there is a post somewhere with pictures that you had taken of the towers while in NYC. Did you go inside either tower?</i><br /><br />I know the one. It was a picture I took looking up (the nostrils) at my friend Eric, with Tower 1 and 2 in the background and above him. I posted that at ‘STUFFS’, and I think it must have been the blog bit where I wrote about us getting lost in the Okefenokee Swamp (an October ‘Halloween’ blog bit). And, no, I did not enter either WTC Tower (I think there was a bar nearby that caught my eye). <br /><br /><i>>>… I definitely felt safer in the Empire State building, most likely because it had survived a small plane fender-bender, and a gorilla attack.</i><br /><br />Ha!-Ha! Ahh, yes, but you forget that the World Trade Center Towers had ALSO survived a gorilla attack in 1976 (Jessica Lange and Jeff Bridges were eyewitnesses to it). <br /><br /><i>>>… My own opinions about the proximity and construction of those high-rise buildings enhance my doubts about WTC 7 being a "smoking gun". Trying to examining the real evidence is often clouded by too much bad science disseminated by pseudo-experts, and weak documentaries...</i><br /><br />Hmmm… That comment most definitely surprised me. Without trying to explore this topic too deeply and extensively in a “comment section”, I will simply point out a couple of things and see what you think of my reasoning:<br /><br />Continued Below...Stephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-4971658362592947222013-01-15T18:34:07.451-08:002013-01-15T18:34:07.451-08:00SHEBOYGANBOY 6 ~
A Brief Follow-Up:
>>… Vio...<b>SHEBOYGANBOY 6 ~</b><br />A Brief Follow-Up:<br /><br /><i>>>… Violence in our society could be 20 times what it is now and it still would never mean that the government could legally or morally take action to restrict them.</i><br /><br />An excellent point, written like it came from a man who fully understands our country’s founding principles and the intent and concerns of our Founding Fathers. (And, hey, SURPRISE! – Whaddaya know? That’s exactly the sort of man who wrote it.) <br /><br /><i>>>… Oh... and NO WAY did Tower 7 come down on its own. One look at how the blasts evenly appear simultaneously along one side and then it falls straight down should show even the "casual voter" that it did not collapse because of fire from another building!!!</i><br /><br />Our Constitution-loving, fellow American patriot Sig mentioned something in his comment (above) about Tower 7 that I am going to briefly address here soon, and you may find it worth reading. (Feel free to add your own .02 cents if ya wanna. You and Sig are two of the smartest people I know, and I would decline to enter an I.Q. contest against either of ya.) <br /><br /><br /><b>FarAwayEyes ~</b><br />A Brief Follow-Up:<br /><br /><i>>>… I and a great number of Native Americans probably would not concur on that holocaust statement. He came back and agreed and reminded me that the massacre at Wounded Knee came AFTER the confiscation of their guns. A fine example of how the US Government responds to keeping the people ‘in line’.</i><br /><br />Yes, I read your original comment and his reply. That was an excellent example and it displayed great insight on the part of both of you. <br /><br />The fact is, human nature being what it is, if you give 100 persons a great deal of authority over their fellow man, and likely 97% of them will eventually abuse their power. And we’re supposed to believe that government will always have our best interest at heart, and a single global government run by International Bankers will be a peaceful paradise on Earth? Call me a cynic, but I think not. <br /><br /><i>>>… I’m not sure we should think of the US government as the enemy, but rather more like ‘Big Brother’.</i><br /><br />I’m such an idiot that I had to read that two or three times before I realized what a joke you were making. (However, in my defense, I’m extraordinarily tired, having stayed up ‘til 1:35 AM and 2:00 AM the last couple nights in order to semi-keep a promise to a friend of mine. Wink!-Wink! Nudge!-Nudge! Was it as good for you as it was for me?)<br /><br /> <br /><b>SUSAN ~</b><br />A Brief Follow-Up:<br /><br />After mentioning the Oregon Vortex to you on your blog, I myself spent close to two hours surfing the Web and reading stuffs about it. <br /><br />I look forward to your post (The humor is almost built in, isn’t it?), and will definitely read it and comment, but probably not until sometime after I get home from work tomorrow night.<br /><br />~ D-FensDogg<br />‘Loyal American Underground’ Stephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-87239576466555276972013-01-15T14:15:21.546-08:002013-01-15T14:15:21.546-08:00Thanks for clarifying, Stephen. But I still say, n...Thanks for clarifying, Stephen. But I still say, no matter how long ago you started doing research on this topic, you clearly spent a LOT of time on it, and on putting it altogether for this post. (Which, I might add, is longer than some books I've read... HA!)<br /><br />Great comment, farawayeyes.<br /><br />Oh, and just so ya know, it's all YOUR fault, Stephen. I wasted waaaaaay too long reading about the Oregon Vortex and associated topics today. Will be posting about it tomorrow.Susan Flett Swiderskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09425315552148200073noreply@blogger.com