tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post6804050260189567430..comments2023-08-22T11:08:35.711-07:00Comments on FERRET-FACED FASCIST FRIENDS: THE "HO BIB" TELLS ME SOStephen T. McCarthyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comBlogger18125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-56552086499178123162011-03-07T22:10:33.270-08:002011-03-07T22:10:33.270-08:00Part 2 Of 2:
I have studied Islam sufficiently to...Part 2 Of 2:<br /><br />I have studied Islam sufficiently to conclude that if it has a supernatural origin (and there’s reason to believe it very well might have), then it was demonically inspired. And the most important point that many people overlook in studying the New World Order is the demonic foundation that supports it. The NWO is NOT a secular movement directed by evildoing Elites who seek to enslave the rest of us solely from an egomaniacal standpoint, but a SPIRITUAL movement directed by anti-Christ forces. Failing to note this important feature is the fatal flaw of most of the books that have been published about the NWO. <br /><br />As far as Muslims are concerned, I can get along just fine with any of them (and I have a history of doing so) provided they don’t follow the Qur’an too literally. <br /><br /><i>>>.....I have no doubt they have something planned, another problem, reaction, solution type scenario, possibly a faked UFO invasion, to bring about the end of religion as we know it, to replace it with something even worse.</i><br /><br />Certainly a very real possibility! You are not alone in that suspicion, as I’m sure you know. And I find it fascinating that everywhere I turn these days, I seem to “encounter” another UFO-related story. Government’s releasing previously classified UFO documents, etc. There is no question that this topic is getting more press these days. <br /><br />I was utterly captivated by the UFO subject from as far back as fifth grade (1969), and is it mere coincidence that a decade or so ago my long years of UFO studies led me to the conclusion that UFOs are in fact demonic in origin? I think not! <br /><br />Thanks for your comment, Saladin. <br /><br />~ StephenStephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-81798587488292464702011-03-07T22:09:40.390-08:002011-03-07T22:09:40.390-08:00Part 1 Of 2:
Howdy, SALADIN ~
>>.....Consi...Part 1 Of 2:<br /><br />Howdy, SALADIN ~<br /><br /><i>>>.....Considering the fact that the book of Revelation, AKA the Apocalypse, meaning a revealing or unveiling, relies heavily on vivid symbolism, I think the harlot represents a dogma more than a physical entity. I lean toward false religion in general...</i><br /><br />Well, you could be right, and I never pretend to know things I don't <i><b>KNOW</b></i>. <br /><br />There are some folks who consistently interpret The Bible literally and some who consistently interpret it symbolically. But life has taught me that seldom is the "Either/Or" approach the best. More times than not, the better way to view things is “BOTH!” And that reflects my own approach in attempting to understand The Bible.<br /><br />The references to “that great city Babylon” (as cited in the blog bit above) strike me as too specific and literal-minded to be reinterpreted symbolically. Such as the mention of shipmasters and all the travelers in ships and sailors standing afar off and crying when they see the smoke of her burning and saying, "What city is like to this great city!"<br /><br />I believe it’s speaking of a real city, and the only city that meets the Biblical standard in our day is New York. Perhaps it’s referring to another city, but if so, I believe it’s probably also referring to another time than our own. <br /><br />The references to the woman with the lamp who is set upon a base, I have interpreted simultaneously in a literal AND symbolic way. <br /><br />I do agree with you, however, that false religion plays into the End-Time scenario, as The Bible speaks not only of a “Beast” (anti-Christ) rising to power in the Last Days, but also of at least one “False Prophet” that aids the Beast. The False Prophet must almost certainly refer to a false religion or spiritual view that deludes the masses. <br /><br /><i>>>…..It seems to me one of the major goals of the NWO is to discredit religion wherever possible, especially Christianity and Islam, two belief systems that are a major thorn in the elites side and make up the bulk of religious faith on this planet.</i><br /><br />I half agree with you here. Christianity for sure. But I see how Islam can be (and likely is being) used by the Elites in their Hegelian Dialectic maneuverings. The fact of the matter is that the mainstream media is not inclined to think critically of Islam and to publicly criticize it. I think Islam is a pawn that is being played in the geopolitical chess game. <br /><br />Continued Below...Stephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-3555364920733728622011-03-07T12:40:31.897-08:002011-03-07T12:40:31.897-08:00Considering the fact that the book of Revelation, ...Considering the fact that the book of Revelation, AKA the Apocalypse, meaning a revealing or unveiling, relies heavily on vivid symbolism, I think the harlot represents a dogma more than a physical entity. I lean toward false religion in general, which is a harlot that is in bed with all the power brokers of the world, or 7 continents. To bring about total destruction need not mean a literal, physical one, but a philosophical one, wherein the people, led by the deceiving powers that be, turn on religion en masse, and bring it down by simply turning their backs on it. It seems to me one of the major goals of the NWO is to discredit religion wherever possible, especially Christianity and Islam, two belief systems that are a major thorn in the elites side and make up the bulk of religious faith on this planet. I have no doubt they have something planned, another problem, reaction, solution type scenario, possibly a faked UFO invasion, to bring about the end of religion as we know it, to replace it with something even worse. Keep in mind that Babylon was a great religious mecca in it's day. Just a theory. Also, the Scofield version of the bible is very popular among the faith I call the Armagheddonites, you may learn about it here:<br />http://www.rense.com/general60/zcre.htmAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-88028671958198533252011-03-06T10:13:43.229-08:002011-03-06T10:13:43.229-08:00You'll get no argument from me.
Brer MarcYou'll get no argument from me. <br /><br /> Brer MarcAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-60575367749064059652011-03-05T10:51:57.147-08:002011-03-05T10:51:57.147-08:00BR'ER ~
You make a good point about the "...BR'ER ~<br />You make a good point about the "Emotion" factor, and believing or disbelieving something based upon how it makes one "feel".<br /><br />But for me, the bottom line is that a truly intelligent person ought to arrive at the correct conclusions more times than not; we're all fallible, and so no one is going to figure it all out right every time, but the genuinely intelligent person will hold far more correct beliefs than incorrect beliefs. <br /><br />But in our exchanges with "G", he was wrong about 3 of the 4 topics that were introduced. He's wrong about The Bible being "a book of fairy tales"; he's wrong about Evolution; and he's wrong about Global Warming.<br /><br />The only thing I can give him credit for is doubting the "Official Government Lie" about what happened on 9/11. But even then I can only give him half credit because I strongly suspect that had 9/11 occurred on USAP OBAMA's watch rather than on George W(ish I had a brain) Bush's watch, "G" would be telling you, me and Barguedust that we are all "crazy kooks" for questioning the Official Version.<br /><br />I think he's a God-hating Leftist first and foremost, and all of his ideology is colored by that basic starting point. He's hardly objective (i.e., "scientific") as it was clear he knew little to nothing about what those earnest and dedicated individuals who oppose his views have had to say about the problems with Evolution and Global Warming, and the known facts that support a belief in the historicity and validity of The Bible.<br /><br />Had 9/11 been perpetrated by a Democrat administration, I am convinced that "G" would have accepted the "Official Lie" because he would not have had the incentive to really dig in and examine the evidence with an open mind toward questioning the things that simply don't add up. <br /><br />In other words, "G" is biased and his bias leads to faulty judgments ...and there ain't nuttin' "SMART" about <i>THAT!</i><br /><br />By the way, below is one of my very favorite quotes related to Global Warming: <br /><br /><b><i>“For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?"</i></b> <br />~ Geologist Dr. David Gee the chairman of the science committee of the 2008 International Geological Congress who has authored 130 plus peer-reviewed papers, and is currently at Uppsala University in Sweden.<br /><br />~ D-FensDogg<br />'Loyal American Underground'Stephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-42769382459716194342011-03-04T23:19:51.207-08:002011-03-04T23:19:51.207-08:00Stephen,
I see your point. By saying he was int...Stephen,<br /> I see your point. By saying he was intelligent I didn't mean his argument was sound. He used very basic principles to attack those who oppose his view point: slander them, produce false evidence that looks genuine and contradicts the opposition, and make the opposition look like they don't know what their talking about. I don't debate with such people. For one, I'm not a good debater, and I don't like wasting my time. I agree with you in that he is not nearly as intelligent as he thinks he is. However, I disagree with you in his ability to manipulate the facts. Where you and I are able to see him coming a mile away, most people can't. To them his attacks seem like some guy fed up with religious cooks, and trying to set the record straight. I kid you not I work with people who are very smart in the field of medicine that would have fallen for that hook line and sinker. See friend, it is the knowledge of the Word of God that really is the back bone to politics and science. Some will curse me for saying that, but it's true. You either believe in greater odds than a trillion to one that order came from caos, or you believe in God, a creator. When one loses the ability to contemplate that God may in fact exist, they lose the ability to fact check so many things. I read his final posts well. We talked about loving the "Feeling" of christianity when he went to church but couldn't turn off his critical thinking. Bingo. He is one who is in love with the emotion of things, and when that lets him down he looks to destroy it. What he doesn't understand is that his own emotions are flawed. One can't just go with or leave something based on a feeling and be taken seriously (at least not by me). I got the impression he had issues with the church and how it made him feel, and decided to join a new religion. The religion of The big bang, darwinian evolution, and all the other fairy tales out there. In the end he shows himself to be just like his master Darwin. Darwin too left the church once his emotions took him in another direction. But most people don't consider darwin might have been impacted by the death of his child. <br /><br /> I do believe our mutual attacker is smart from a manipulative perspective. Just not from a logical non emotional one.mousiemarchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10946780831209471709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-58448235579013205602011-03-03T09:18:18.925-08:002011-03-03T09:18:18.925-08:00Part 2 Of 2:
And I was not at all bluffing when I...Part 2 Of 2:<br /><br />And I was not at all bluffing when I told him that I could go through his beliefs point-by-point and disprove or cast deep, deep doubt on every one of them. He probably really did believe that I was trying to avoid a face-off, but I wasn't. You know me by now, and you know I don't make statements I can't support. But he was so rude, so arrogant, and so biased in his view that I wasn't going to waste any more of my time on him.<br /><br />I don't mind discussing a subject with someone whose view is 180 degrees from my own, because I always figure there's a good chance I will win them over to my side or at least cause them to seriously begin rethinking their stance or to at least begin considering the possible validity of an alternate view. But the moment I discern that the person is entrenched in their view and not at all open-minded to opposing viewpoints - in other words, an "intellectually dishonest ideologue" (which is precisely what "G" is) - I will not waste any additional time on him or her. ...Unless, of course, the subject is Senator McCarthy, in which case I will kick their ass anyway, just for the pure joy of it. <br />Ha! :o)<br /><br />No, in my opinion, "G" is not half as smart as he wants to believe he is, and unfortunately, someday his own overestimation of himself will probably be the ruin of him. Let's hope he has a change of heart and mind before that occurs.<br /><br />As far as his last posts are concerned - or the last ones I took a look at, anyway - I thought he had become almost comical. There was this long, long list of YouTube links that presumably prove him right. But he just sounded like he had become more and more desperate, and was just crying out for some acknowledgement that he had "won".<br /><br />He came off looking like some manchild suffering from a bout of "The Terrible Twos" and I actually (almost) felt sorry for him at that point. Any GENUINELY intelligent person who comes across that exchange later is going to see "G" as a pathetic creature who was, in the end, reduced to some manic Neanderthal screaming himself hoarse in an empty room. <br /><br />~ D-FensDogg<br />'Loyal American Underground'<br /><br />POSTSCRIPT: His comments on the next blog bit showed that he wasn't even familar with how the Associated Press operates. Yeah, some "man of the world"! Just another know-nuttin' "Generation Text" know-it-all!Stephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-71751863237106856642011-03-03T09:17:49.661-08:002011-03-03T09:17:49.661-08:00Part 1 Of 2:
BR'ER MARC ~
For some reason the...Part 1 Of 2:<br /><br /><b>BR'ER MARC ~</b><br />For some reason the first part of your 2-part comment below on "Pride" (the longer entry) got sent to my "Spam" file, while part 2 went to the proper "Comments" file and I published it.<br /><br />I just now discovered part 1 under "Spam" and published it. Buggy system!<br /><br />I VERY MUCH agree with your assessment about Pride and Self-Worship! That's right on, Brother! (Does the fact that I agree with you mean that you are now MY master?)<br /><br />The only thing I'm not onboard with is your assessment of "G's" intelligence. To the contrary, I would argue that he is NOT very intelligent. And I'm not saying this simply because I dislike his personality.<br /><br />In that exchange, he did not exhibit the traits I associate with intelligence, but rather the traits one generally finds in a person who is lacking in the ability to reason something out objectively.<br /><br />Intelligent people don't resort to personal smears and ad hominem attacks when debating a subject because they know that facts alone will ultimately bring them victory. Emotional responses like we saw from "G" are always the first sign that the person is attempting to defend weak ground, they suspect as much, and must compensate with an overabundance of venom or passion.<br /><br />Also, an intelligent person will view and evaluate as many of the available angles of a thing before coming down on one side or another. Yet, it was perfectly clear to me right from the get-go that "G" had spent little or no time pondering and evaluating alternate evidence and rationally and genuinely considering the views espoused by those who articulately oppose the position that he has chosen to accept.<br /><br />When I spoke of past fraudulent acts and statements committed by some "scientists" who have attempted to sell the masses on the basic view that "G" accepts, he simply said that what I'd written was "absurd" and that was the end of that.<br /><br />But if he had objectively examined the subject from the other side, he would have already known that all I'd said there was not "absurd" but easily verified facts. <br /><br />His arguments for why he dismisses The Bible were immature, and displayed Junior High School depth of thinking. Obviously, he hasn't devoted much time to genuinely studying The Bible either. <br /><br />(Anytime I find a person dismissing The Bible and/or Jesus by playing "the slavery card", I KNOW that I am in the presence of someone not given to much deep thinking or the ability to reason their way through a body of evidence, link up various ideas in a rational manner, and arrive at logical conclusions based upon that evidence.) <br /><br />Continued Below...Stephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-69580410638455639062011-03-02T10:18:54.872-08:002011-03-02T10:18:54.872-08:00Pass it on...
The Alternative Market Project Has ...Pass it on...<br /><br />The Alternative Market Project Has Been Launched<br /><br />http://saladin-avoiceinthewilderness.blogspot.com/2011/03/alternative-market-project-has-been.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-29248033358505825182011-02-27T22:22:39.717-08:002011-02-27T22:22:39.717-08:00[12 ] Indeed, all who desire to live a godly life ...[12 ] Indeed, all who desire to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted, [13 ] while evil people and impostors will go on from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived. <br />(2 Timothy 3:12-13 ESV)<br /><br />Also remember the word of God also says that knowledge can puff one up.mousiemarchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10946780831209471709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-15315238252050187922011-02-27T21:37:42.909-08:002011-02-27T21:37:42.909-08:00If I wasn't so tired I would look up the verse...If I wasn't so tired I would look up the verse where Paul talks of what you just said Stephen. Really though the more I listen to people who are in fact worldly smart, but spiritually stupid the more I understand where it's coming from. PRIDE!!!! Why would someone go on other peoples blogs and attempt to insult, slander, and puff themselves up? PRIDE!!! What is the opposite of pride? Being humble. That's why I find a lot of very intelligent people abandoning the word of God, or being too blind to ever take it seriously. I was reading 2 Chronicles last night and not even thinking of our mutual encounter. How king Asa first followed adn trusted in God and was successful. Later he trusted in himself, his army and other kings and failed. It was his pride. The same pride Satan tempted David with to census Israel. It really clicked with me, and really I should have gotten it sooner as "One World" tells of it all too well. How can these people believe and follow the one true God when they have made themselves into God? After all, though they deny it, being that absobed with your own brain power is a self of self worship. That is exactly how Satan fell. "I will be like the most high" as it was stated in Isaiah. It is pride, which really is a form of self worship. <br /><br /> He was attempting to say, "I'm smarter than you. I'll slander you, and you can't do anything about it. I hate what you stand for so I'll do anything I can to shame you." Not because they have a genuine concern about who might be reading something they disagree with. No, they have no concern about their fellow man. It is about their ego and that is just a manifestation of their pride. It is comes from the same tree that most evil comes from. <br /><br /> I almost left another comment telling the individual were talking about why I wont follow his blog (even though i actually look for opinions that differ from my own). I thought about telling him that he lost all credibility when he started calling people names like a 3rd grader. After all i do have one requirement when i read research something. The person presenting the information has to have a genuine passion for their subject that is not based around their own ego. You just can't trust people like that. Their ego comes first, even before the truth. The individual your talking about is obviously not stupid and is skillful in manipulation. Though his last posts really reveal more about him than he originally led on. Read carefully one realizes he wasn't very upfront with us. As he came into the subject with bias an an agenda.mousiemarchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10946780831209471709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-34971115467203359542011-02-26T16:50:46.544-08:002011-02-26T16:50:46.544-08:00Thought you'd appreciate these videos, really ...Thought you'd appreciate these videos, really annoys the liberal class.<br /><br />http://saladin-avoiceinthewilderness.blogspot.com/2011/02/capitalism-is-anarchy.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-17948144903569890212011-02-26T12:12:07.482-08:002011-02-26T12:12:07.482-08:00BR'ER MARC ~
Thanks for taking the time to rea...BR'ER MARC ~<br />Thanks for taking the time to read this, and for the fine comment!<br /><br />Yeah, I am pretty careful about how I phrase things. And especially when it comes to Biblical interpretations, I am cautious, and never state something as "a fact", but rather as a personal opinion or theory, unless I am extremely confident the matter is indeed "a fact". <br /><br />Despite having studied The Bible to the extent that I have, I still believe there are some passages - particularly in Revelation - that we will not really understand until those events are actually occurring, and some, perhaps, not even until AFTER those events have occurred. <br /><br />It was quite some years ago that I first began to entertain the idea that New York City was represented as "Babylon the great" or "that great city Babylon" in prophecy. But it was only maybe 3 years ago that I made the Zechariah connection in association with that.<br /><br />I did a Google search and discovered that I am far from being the only person to associate New York City with "Babylon the great". In fact, I even found a YouTube video making that same claim and illustrating the point. <br /><br />But as far as I know, my Zechariah connection might be fairly unique to me. Heck, even David Haggith failed to note it in his excellent book "End-Time Prophecies Of The Bible". However, I will readily admit that if Lamsa's translation was not my primary source for Biblical studies, I too would have missed the Zechariah connection (if it is in fact a genuine connection to the "Babylon" verses in Revelation). <br /><br />And BR'ER, you are so spot on in your observations regarding the technology being available to implement "a one world government and economy". <br /><br />And yet, despite Biblical prophecy remarkably becoming technologically possible right before our eyes (and the mind-set of our Elite to use the technology in accordance with the intent articulated in Biblical warnings being quite obvious to those of us who are paying attention), there are still so many "intellectuals" and "MENSA Morons" out there blindly insisting that The Bible is a book of "fairy tales". <br /><br />Yeah, well, won't THEY be surprised when that book of fairy tales eventually bites them right in the ass!<br /><br />Thanks for the comment, BR'ER!<br /><br />~ D-FensDogg<br />'Loyal American Underground'Stephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-21698247081096794332011-02-25T20:39:50.803-08:002011-02-25T20:39:50.803-08:00Stephen,
Plausible yes, all of it. Absolute, n...Stephen,<br /> Plausible yes, all of it. Absolute, no way. Though if the book of revelation is going to happen in the next, say, 5 to 10 years I put this in the catagory of real, genuine, prophecy BY YOU... No joke. I have read in revelation where it talks about the eagle, and for me this could represent a nation (the eagle being our symbol). I even was talking to a minister who I honestly think has a good grasp of reality and biblical accuracy for a trinitarian. He stated, and I quote him from memory, "I'm absolutely convinced that the United States is Babylon." Could he be wrong. Heck ya. However, with RFID technology, the fact that Aaron Russo recorded one of the international bankers talking with him about it (Nick Rockefeller), and that their plans are to in fact chip the entire population should give anyone pause. <br /><br /> Think of it this way. For the first time in human history we have: technology to talk to someone around the world in minutes, technology to microchip the entire population with implanted global tracking technology, politicians pushing for a one world economy, the technology is available to implement a one world government and economy. Finally, people are truly not interested in the bible at all no matter how easily one can get one. Most christians make no attempt to read the New Testament let alone the Old. Far more are just plain ignorant. I have met many well intentioned and born again christians who have made little to no effort to truly understand. Though I can tell you that their passion for God is real, and their work for him has fruit. Many times it is that too much is fed to them, or that it is not the emphasis at their church. Not saying I'm a biblical scholar by any stretch. Just a guy who is hungry and wants to understand as much as possible. <br /><br /> Back on subject. Ya I think your possibly right on point. Given some of the hair brained things I've heard people say about the bible I wouldn't worry about what you wrote here. After all, you not only honestly represented your points, but you presented it for what it was. <br /><br /> Brer Marcmousiemarchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10946780831209471709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-12613220942822068072011-02-19T00:03:37.736-08:002011-02-19T00:03:37.736-08:00TODDFAN DISCMAN ~
THIS reflects my attitude about ...TODDFAN DISCMAN ~<br /><a href="http://ilike.myspacecdn.com/play#Elvis+Costello:Waiting+For+The+End+Of+The+World:77915:s100374.9291.3821206.1.1.32%2Cstd_dc6b20e1d1be58d3e2960e37489233e9" rel="nofollow">THIS</a> reflects my attitude about it all.<br /><br />As far as I’m concerned, last year wouldn’t have been too soon.<br /><br />~ D-FensDogg<br />‘Loyal American Underground’Stephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-63651216695349220602011-02-18T16:25:16.256-08:002011-02-18T16:25:16.256-08:00McDogg-
Considering I've never actually gotte...McDogg-<br /><br />Considering I've never actually gotten you to ANSWER your cell phone, I'm surprised you opted for the battery when you originally purchased it.<br /><br />As to the United States being a major player in the Apocalypse...well maybe as VICTIMS! CANNON FODDER!<br /><br />I think we'll probably miss the whole thing because the networks won't want to interrupt 'Survivor' to tell viewers that the world is ending.<br /><br />It will go from a commerical break to a mushroom cloud, and the only way we'll know is that people's "Grand Theft Auto XXVII-GTA Verus Rocky" games will all stop working....<br /><br />And then we'll melt.<br /><br />So your theory on NYC as Babylon is flawed, because Americonns are too friggin' DUMB.<br /><br />LCDiscConnectedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07013919800637508392noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-29895718164702944302011-02-17T23:48:20.338-08:002011-02-17T23:48:20.338-08:00>>.....I'd like to hear some other react...<i>>>.....I'd like to hear some other reactions to this.</i><br /><br />Yeah, LEE, so would I.<br /><br />Thanks for reading it. It was long, I know, but I felt it was important and that I kept it interesting enough to justify the length.<br /><br />~ Stephen<br /><i>"As a dog returns to his own vomit, <br />so a fool repeats his folly." <br />~ Proverbs 26:11</i>Stephen T. McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00249125637725791567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1272211918278108300.post-85282561068188580592011-02-17T22:40:45.186-08:002011-02-17T22:40:45.186-08:00I won't be one to say it ain't so. This is...I won't be one to say it ain't so. This is the first time I've ever heard this theory presented and it does seem feasible. It's now in my memory bank of conceivable interpretations and as bad as my memory tends to be about most things, I do tend to remember end time prophecy theories. This is well thought out and somewhat convincing. I'd like to here some other reactions to this.<br /><br />Lee<br /><a href="http://tossingitout.blogspot.com/2011/01/very-special-and-exciting-announcement.html" rel="nofollow"> the Blogging From A to Z April Challenge 2011</a>Arlee Birdhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11663942782929929334noreply@blogger.com