.
.
.
At
last it's here, the third and final installment of this series. I
apologize that it's taken me so long to complete this, particularly
since I know how eagerly you've all been awaiting this denouement to
the series. It's a wonder y'all haven't died from holding yer breath
so long. (Ha!) I have the very best excuse in the world for the
delay: lack of inspiration, also known as apathy or resignation to
fate.
At
this point you'll need a reminder of how this thing began. If you
recall from Part One, I was explaining how to defeat Liberals and
other idiots in a debate. I laid out three essential rules and they
were...
1:
I’ve
had plenty enough debates with Liberals to have learned not to fall
for “the
ol’ red herring down the rabbit hole”
trick (as Maxwell Smart might have put it). In other words, don’t
let them lead you down some path that diverts the focus from the
original
argument into complex absurdities.
2:
Liberals figure that if they throw
enough bullshit at the ceiling and walls, some of it will stick. The
trick is to control
the
debate
so they can’t fling their poo. In other words, #2
is simply a slight variation on #1:
Don’t follow the red herring down the rabbit hole but, rather,
scrape the bullshit off the ceiling and walls and FORCE
the
Liberal to stay on the head of the pin!
3:
And, unfortunately for many
conservative would-be heroes, this is the single most important rule:
There is no
substitute for really
KNOWING
the
facts.
(And if you’ve got a cutting sense of humor, by all means cut with
it; the devil HATES
to be mocked!)
Now
I am going to share with you an old debate I had with some maroon who
thought he was going to buffalo me about Barack “Marxslim”
Obama's phony, forged, felonious long-form birth certificate.
The
dude's name was Dan Lynch, and when you consider how many blog bits
I'd previously published about Barack Oliar's fake birth certificate,
it's kind of funny that he challenged me about it in the comment
section of a blog installment that really didn't even pertain to
Obama's birth certificate. The blog bit was titled SEMJASE
SEZ: EARTH WAS COLONIZED BY EXTRATERRESTRIALS (Or, BETWEEN A ROCK AND
A SPACE PLACE)
and was posted on April 29, 2012. It was primarily about an alleged
UFO video filmed in Sweden and my only mention of Oliar's birth
certificate was this:
“I
do know, however, that if this is a hoax, it’s pretty well done –
certainly faked 1,000 times better than Obama’s Hawaii
birth
certificate was.”
This
character, Dan Lynch, seized upon that remark and challenged me about
the birth certificate, ultimately trying to muddy the water with 7
URLs for me to check out (including, hilariously enough, one that led
to Wackypedia, as if I were too stupid to know what a propagandistic
website Wackypedia is!) After trying to bury me in URL BULLSHITLAND
he administered what he thought was the coup de grace by informing me
of the following:
“The
DOH of Hawaii stated in a letter that she had seen the original birth
certificate being copied onto security paper and that was the
document that she gave to Obama’s lawyer. That physical copy was
passed around in the White House press room and everyone there got a
chance to hold it, and feel the seal. One reporter even photographed
it.”
So
how did I answer him? Well, I applied the 3 Rules For Debating
Liberals. (Pay special attention to how I employed Rule
#2.)
Below is my two-part response to which Loony Lynch never replied, and
that came as no surprise to me:
.
|
B.O.'s FAKE B.C. |
.
Part
1 Of 2:
DAN LYNCH ~
First, I want to remind you that it was
you who posted this URL on my blog and called me out; prior to April
29th I was happily unaware of your existence. So don’t blame me for
how this goes – you brought it on yourself.
Secondly, I
apologize for taking so long to respond. Honestly, beating Liberals
in debates was NEVER a challenge and sadly, after all these years,
even the joy has gone out of it for me. On my list of priorities,
exposing your preposterous opinion about Barack Obama’s birth
certificate ranks very low [...] And frankly, I wouldn’t even
bother replying to you except my Brother insists I do so because he
can’t stand seeing you Liberals get away with so much nonsense.
But I consider addressing you on this matter to be a colossal
waste of my time, akin to arguing with a two-year-old who insists
that the ocean is made of blueberry juice.
I glanced at the
websites you linked me to and found them irrelevant in this
discussion about whether or not Obama’s birth certificate is
fraudulent. True to the form of your type, you want to obfuscate the
facts, bait and switch, introduce lots of meaningless
‘round-‘n’-‘round hearsay, and generally just sidestep all
the important evidence while piling two tons of hay atop the needles
that really make “the point”. (Yeah, I know how it works; I’ve
been debating the “Dan Lynches” for years and I’ve encountered
all the evasive techniques.)
You can point to people who say
they’ve seen Obama’s authentic long-form Hawaii birth certificate
and I can point to people who have been in a position to see it but
say they couldn’t locate it, who claim that it doesn’t
exist.
And I don’t give a damn what some judge, federal
employee or state bureaucrat says; liars can be bought and criminals
can be blackmailed, and our court system, our federal and state
governments are overrun with liars and criminals. So don’t give me
any of this “So-And-So said that...” It’s all irrelevant and
means nothing to me or to anyone else who understands how corrupt
government officials are in the United States today.
So I’ll
tell ya what we’re gonna do, buddy. We’re going to take all the
speculation, the hearsay, and all the other B.S. off the table and
deal strictly with the facts that anybody with even one working eye
can examine for him/herself. I am going to ask you a few
straightforward questions and you are going to answer me plainly,
directly, in your own words. If you can’t do that, you lose by
default and I’ll not reply to any future nonsense posted by you on
my blog.
I think we can probably both agree that if Barack
Obama has a real, authentic long-form Hawaii birth certificate, he
would not have had to forge one. If he had a real one, he would have
shown it to the American people. Therefore, if the one that he and
his White House displayed for us can be shown to be a forgery, then
we can conclude that there’s no good reason to believe that Obama
has a genuine one that he could have shown instead.
That
being the case, I want you to tell my WHY there are so many different
typefaces on Obama’s birth certificate as seen HERE.
Being
a former professional designer of commercial signs, it is
outrageously obvious to me that a multitude of different typefaces
were utilized in the forging of Obama’s birth certificate. However,
it hardly takes a person who has used a lot of different typefaces in
professional work to see the markedly different typefaces that were
employed in the manufacturing of Obama’s phony birth certificate.
The variety of typefaces is sufficient on its face to show
that the document is fraudulent. (Unless you want to tell me that
someone had a good reason for typing the original birth certificate
in a whole bunch of different typewriters.)
Continued
Below...
Part
2 Of 2:
Then I want you to tell me why the Alvin T. Onaka
rubber stamp supposedly used on Obama’s original birth certificate
shows a smiley face in the “A” of Alvin, when no other Onaka
rubber stamp imprint shows that same smiley face. Also, I want to
know why that same rubber stamp imprint on Obama’s birth
certificate shows the word “THE” as “TXE”
instead, in the statement “I CERTIFY THIS IS A TRUE COPY OR
ABSTRACT OF TXE RECORD ON FILE IN THE HAWAII STATE DEPARMENT OF
HEALTH”. Why is that misspelling not found on any other known Onaka
rubber stamp imprint?
Both of these unexplained anomalies can
be found in photographs toward the bottom of the Web page HERE.
And
finally, I want you to logically explain to me why the postal service
stamp on Obama’s Selective Service registration shows the date as
"July 29, 80", rather than the year being indicated by four
digits (1980) as it is on other postal service stamps. The photograph
shown HERE
(right next to Obama’s forged stamp) indicates that, only two days
later, the same post office where Obama’s Selective Service
registration was supposedly imprinted was utilizing a stamp that had
all four digits of the date included (1980, not 80).
OK,
those are facts that anyone can see, stripped of conjecture, hearsay,
and wild imaginings. How do you answer them? If you’re going to
respond to me, make it direct, make it concise, make it MAKE SENSE!
If you can’t answer these simple questions sans the customary mumbo
jumbo and diversionary tactics, then don’t waste any more of my
time.
Naturally I’ve assumed you’re a Liberal at heart
because I can’t believe anyone but a Liberal would attempt to
defend this patently phony birth certificate.
It seems to me
one of two possibilities explains your desire to defend the
indefensible: 1) either you know the birth certificate is fake but
you’re willing to argue that it’s not because you’re a die-hard
Lib or a government disinformation agent (in which case you subscribe
to the premise that “the end justifies the means”); or 2) you
REALLY DO think the birth certificate is genuine, in which case all
this boasting on your blog about your capacity to think intelligently
notwithstanding, you’re really just the little caboose on the Brain
Train.
~ D-FensDogg
‘Loyal American Underground’
.
|
GLENN OR GLENDA "MARSHMALLOW HEAD" BECK |
.
Not surprisingly, Mr. Lynch replied to
my questions with nuttin' but the sound of silence.
Phoenix
Sheriff Joe Arpaio conducted an intensive investigation into Barack
Oliar's birth certificate and after more than a year, he and his
investigating team came to the conclusion that the document was
fraudulent.
YouTube
–
World
Net Daily / Sheriff Joe Arpaio Press Conference:
However,
the average person with an average intellect could easily come to the
same conclusion that the Sheriff's team did after no more than an
hour's worth of honest, objective study of the document.
If
that's so (and it IS)
then why have the Republican Senators, Congressmen, and media talking
heads (like Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh,
Michael Medved, and Glenn or Glenda “Marshmallow Head” Beck)
refused to inform the Americonned Sheeple about the phony birth
certificate? In fact, why have some of them not only refused to tell
the truth about it, but have even gone on the attack, ridiculing and
mocking the so-called “Birthers”, those people (like myself) who
have insisted all along that Barack “Marxslim” Oliar is not
eligible to be President and has committed a felony by knowingly
passing off forged federal documents about himself?
.
ANN
COULTER DEFENDS OBAMA AGAINST “BIRTHERS”
.
“It’s
like when the networks bring on the three remaining
Klanners
in America on TV.”
~
Ann Coulter
Hey,
Ann, you ever heard of... KLANSMEN? Because Dictionary.com has never
heard of “Klanners”.
GLENN
BECK ON BIRTHER ISSUE:
“DUMBEST
THING I'VE EVER HEARD”
“Why
don’t we go after the things that are provable, after the things
that actually you need to stop right now?” Beck concluded. “And
if you want to argue, then let’s argue based in fact, based on
things that are provable and
true.”
http://www.wnd.com/2010/01/120992/
Oh,
unlike Barack's fake birth certificate, right Glenda? Because there
are no provable facts related to that? Or provable facts related to
his equally fake Selective Service Registration card, or the bizarre
circumstances related to Oliar's Social Security number?
TOP
OFFICIAL IN OBAMA BIRTH MYSTERY KILLED
WOMAN
LONE FATALITY IN HAWAII PLANE CRASH
Why
do the Republicans not tell the truth? Why do they criticize the
American citizens who DO attempt to make the truth known and assign
silly nicknames to them like “Birthers” (or in the case of 9/11,
“Truthers”)? Some people will try to convince you that the
Repugnantcans are simply afraid of being labeled “racists” if
they tell the truth and impeach and prosecute Barack “Marxslim”
Oliar. But does ANYONE
really believe a person like Ann Coulter is afraid of being called a
“racist”? She has already been called every name in the book for
many years. One might make a case that the weenie Glenn Beck would
fear being called a “racist” but that argument would never hold
water with Ann Coulter. And yet she too mocks the “Birthers” and
dodges the birth certificate issue. Why?
I've
been saying it since I first started this 'FERRET-FACED FASCIST
FRIENDS' blog: There are NOT
two political parties – the Repugnantcans and the Dumb-O-Crats!
There is ONE
party with two different faces, and that one party with two faces is
controlled by a powerful cabal behind the scenes which is formulating
a single global government that the cabal will ultimately control.
This future global government is referred to as the “New World
Order”, and there are references to it in God's 'Holy Bible'.
The
purpose of the two-faced political party conducting the fake fights
for public consumption is to DIVIDE
AND
CONQUER
the Americonned Sheeple. It makes no difference which puppet you vote
into power, you always get the
same
Puppeteer:
.
|
TWO POLITICAL PUPPET PARTIES, ONE WEALTHY PUPPETEER |
.
Why
do the Republicans allow Barack Obama to remain in the White House
when he could easily
be charged with a felony, tried, convicted and imprisoned? Why?
Because the Puppeteer behind the scenes that controls the Republicans
- as well as the Democrats - WANTS
Barack Obama in office. Why? Because right now, he is the best man
for the job of “fundamentally
transforming
the
United
States
of
America”.
The
DVD 'AGE
OF
DECEIT'
(which I received from the lovely Flyin' Aardvark for my birthday)
could almost be described as the movie version of Tal Brooke's
excellent book 'ONE
WORLD'.
I strongly urge you to watch at
least
the
first
12
minutes
of the following movie:
Fallen
Angels And The New World Order
To
Watch An Enlarged View Of This Movie,
Click
The URL Link Below
If
the Power Behind The Scenes were to reveal its true method and put it
on a single political bumper sticker, it would look like this:
.
|
PHOTO COURTESY OF BEER BOY BRYAN'S BODACIOUSLY BEAUTIFUL BABE (6-B-ette) |
.
A
good number of my older posts regarding the deceit of Barack
“Marxslim” Obama can be found collected here:
~
Stephen T. McCarthy
YE
OLDE COMMENT POLICY: All comments, pro and con, are welcome. However,
ad hominem attacks and disrespectful epithets will not be tolerated
(read: "posted"). After all, this isn’t
Amazon.com,
so
I don’t have to put up with that kind of bovine excrement.