PHUQ PHOOTBALL AND ITS KNEELING NUMBSKULLS (Or, MY MIAMI DOLPHINS SHIRT IS NOW AQUA AND ORANGE RAGS)

.
No, I have not abandoned my idea of posting a Part 2 of "The Three Kinds Of Communists (Or, A Democrat Is A Socialist Is A Communist"). This is just a brief interlude -- a calm before the storm.

While this National Football League (NFL) protesting subject is hot, I figured I might as well strike, too.
.

.
It was 1972 when I fell in love with football. We were at my Uncle's house to celebrate a holiday (Thanksgiving or possibly Christmas), and I overheard my Pa and his Brother discussing some football team that no one could beat. That, of course, appealed to my 12-year-old male mind. And that started my love affair with the MIAMI DOLPHINS. (The '72 Dolphins are still the only professional football team to ever complete an undefeated season).

Before long, I was eating, drinking, and dreaming Dolphin football, and writing my favorite player's number on almost everything I owned. #39: Larry Csonka. Csonka and fellow running back Jim Kiick were nicknamed "Butch Cassidy And The Sundance Kid", and Csonka ran just like his name sounded [link]: ZONK!
.
As far as I know, Larry Csonka is the only athlete to ever appear on the cover of Sports Illustrated magazine flipping "the bird" to the camera. Yep. Not kidding. Momentarily scroll back up to that photo at the top of this blog bit and take a closer look at Csonka's right hand. Yes, he did it deliberately, and Sports Illustrated didn't catch it until after that issue had been released to the public. Ha!
.
I loved fullback Larry Csonka because he ran the football like a real man -- it was like seeing Rooster Cogburn or Pike Bishop in a football uniform.

Here's my all-time favorite quote about my boyhood football idol:

"Throughout his career, Csonka played fullback like a horse ploughs a field: doggedly, with a high pain threshold and with great determination."

If you need proof, here it is...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azvRQ0QKUMk


The first pro football game I ever attended was a preseason game that my Pa took me to. It was at the Los Angeles Coliseum ('73, I think - or perhaps '74). I got to see "The Zonk" run in person, and it was a memorable bonding event with my Pa (even though the L.A. Lambs actually won that preseason game.)

My interest in sports (primarily Baseball and Football) waned years ago due to the rampant use of steroids and human growth hormones totally skewing everything about natural athletic competition. For many years now, I've only watched the really big sporting events, and very often, not even those. (I'd rather read some great nonfiction while drinking a cold Mojito than watch ESPN.)

But now, I am 100% done watching football forever -- including the Super Bowls. I'm sure you're not living under a rock and have heard about the "National Anthem Protests" that started last year (in 'Crisco, California) and have since become headline news. Professional football is now hemorrhaging and in the process of dying because the SJW players and the idiotic Commissioner and owners underestimated the patriotic fervor of the average American football fan. 

Tom Brady, you can stick a fork in your already deflated football. The end is near!

As is almost always the case, the brilliant thinker and writer Selwyn Duke has accurately analyzed this NFL public relations disaster and explained it succinctly in the following, brief articles.

In this first article, Selwyn Duke wrote:

"The football players are protesting at work, on their employers’ dime and time, something no one has a right to do (lamentably, NFL owners are now enabling this unpatriotic behavior)."

This is a point that so many people who are shouting out that the football players have First Amendment rights to do what they're doing are completely missing.

When you are "on the job" and representing the company that has employed you, you are required to follow their code of conduct or risk being fired.

As a personal example, the sort of work that I do requires me to wear a uniform which includes the company's logo in various places. I absolutely abhor abortion and it is my First Amendment right to express my thoughts and feelings about abortion on my own time. But if I want to wear a pin on my uniform shirt that states "Planned Parenthood Murders Babies", my company has a right to fire me if their rules stipulate that personal political stances are not permitted to be expressed on their company uniform.

Here's the great Selwyn Duke:

WHILE NFL KNEELS, COP INVESTIGATED FOR CALLING BLM "TERRORISTS"

In this second article, Selwyn Duke quotes the NFL's own printed rules which specifically deny the players the right to do what they've been doing (i.e., kneeling, locking arms, or refusing to appear on the field during the playing of The National Anthem).

In fact, Dr. Eowyn of the blog Fellowship Of The Minds has also made this same point HERE:

Here are the NFL’s rules governing the National Anthem, found on pages A62-63 of the NFL Game Operations Manual (Time):

“The National Anthem must be played prior to every NFL game, and all players must be on the sideline for the National Anthem.

During the National Anthem, players on the field and bench area should stand at attention, face the flag, hold helmets in their left hand, and refrain from talking. The home team should ensure that the American flag is in good condition. It should be pointed out to players and coaches that we continue to be judged by the public in this area of respect for the flag and our country. Failure to be on the field by the start of the National Anthem may result in discipline, such as fines, suspensions, and/or the forfeiture of draft choice(s) for violations of the above, including first offenses.”

The NFL Commissioner and NFL team owners have been permitting the players to break the League's own rules. Therefore, the Commissioner and the owners are also to blame for this incredibly widespread public backlash. (Many fans are burning jerseys, team banners, and season tickets and vowing never to watch NFL games again.)

This whole National Anthem protest began over the accusation that Blacks were being specifically targeted and shot by cops. In this next article, Selwyn Duke addresses that subject as well, with inconvenient facts and statistics:

NFL NOT PROTESTING TRUMP, THEY'RE PROTESTING AMERICA
.
In an American Thinker article by William Sullivan, he observed...

The ... "free speech" argument touted by defenders of the NFL and the protesters fails on another front, beyond the immediate substance of the First Amendment.  That is, the NFL is quite comfortable censoring free speech, though it's unmistakable that the speech they choose to prohibit runs afoul of a leftist ideological impulse.  In 2016, the NFL threatened to fine teams who decorated their cleats with a "Never Forget" logo commemorating the 15th anniversary of the September 11th attacks.  They prohibited the Cowboys from wearing helmet decals honoring the five police officers killed by a Black Lives Matter advocate.
.
In a different American Thinker website article, I felt the following commenter made an excellent point:
Bernard Taylor • 4 days ago

Let me get this straight:
Colin Kaepernick, with a multi-million dollar contract, sits for the anthem while his teammates stand, and he is therefore bravely expressing his First Amendment rights.
Alejandro Villanueva, a lowly-paid lineman, stands for the anthem while his teammates hide, and he is apparently denounced by his coach and teammates and shamed into an apology for not hiding with his teammates.
OK, I think I understand how progressive logic is supposed to work.

As for me... For many, many years I have owned a Miami Dolphins shirt that looks (looked) much like this one...
.

.
...and I have always worn it on Christmas days, since it was around Christmastime in 1972 when I first became a MIAMI DOLPHINS fan. Well, last night, I scissored that shirt into about 4 rags that I can now use to wipe up the slop I make in my kitchen and bathroom.
.

.
Me? NFL football? Done. 
For all I care, you can stick a fork in your pigskin and your neck, Cheatriot Tom.
.

~ Stephen T. McCarthy
.

THE THREE KINDS OF COMMUNISTS (Or, A DEMOCRAT IS A SOCIALIST IS A COMMUNIST) Part 1 Of 2

.

David Mamet had a famous saying, essentially: …‘in order for genuine Liberals to continue their illogical belief systems they have to pretend not to know a lot of things’ ... By pretending not to know, there is no attachment to any adverse consequences.

~ Sundance

There are Three kinds of Communists. To begin, I'll tell you about the Fourth kind of Communist -- which isn't really a Communist at all. (That makes perfect sense to me. If it doesn't make sense to you, then get off my blog now. ;o)

There is a certain type of person who advocates Socialism, who never intends to help advancing it to the next stage of development, which is Communism, because s/he is in it just for the power and wealth s/he can grab as a government insider. What these human demons are really working toward is Global Socialism -- also known as the "New World Order" -- in which they imagine themselves entrenched within the ruling body of Fascists and above the Socialism they mean to install for the rest of us.

A perfect example of this Fourth type of Communist who isn't really a Communist at all would be Hillary Clinton. 

[*Recommended Reading: 

Tragedy And Hope: A History Of The World In Our Time by Carroll Quigley]

My regular readers are all smarter'n the average bear and presumably already have a full understanding of the details and complexities of the Communist paradigm as laid out by Marx, Lenin, et al. 

But for those of the post-literate Millennial generation (and anyone who subjected himself to brainwashing by any Indoctrination Center of the American University System since the 1960s) I will put it in a nutshell so I can then continue with everyone on the same page:

First, there has never been a Communist nation. You know that, right? We only called the Soviet Union, Red China, Cambodia, and Cuba "Communism" in order to have a practical label we could apply to that twisted form of government, and because full Communism is what they all pretended to be advancing toward. Every one of them (quite naturally) got stuck in the "Dictatorship Of The Proletariat" stage of the 3-Step Program toward full Communism. (And of course, those in authority never REALLY ever intended to relinquish their stranglehold on power because... mankind's human nature -- which makes real secular Communism impossible. It's Retarded Idealism For Dictator-Wannabes and nuttin' more.)

.

.

As many have explained, in a nutshell, the nutty Communist plan was this:

1) Disrupt and wipe out the old order of Capitalism via Revolutionary Terror.

2) The representatives of the Working Class must then set up a Dictatorship Of The Proletariat. (Funny how so many of the Dictators who rose to power were NOT products of the Working Class, but privileged punks with relatively advanced education.)

3) The transition from Socialism to Full Communism. ("Socialism" is characterized by state ownership of land and all means of production.) 

In this fairy tale, during the Third Stage, "the state will gradually whither away and then property will automatically belong to all mankind 'in common'" in which "each will produce according to his ability and each will receive according to his need". A perfect Utopia where all is one and one is all. No more dog-eat-dog world of competition. A perfectly satisfied planet of limitless abundance for every man, woman and child, because everyone is happily working for the common good. A place where all men are brothers and acting god-like without any need for a supernatural God -- the very idea of Him having been banned from this Man-Made ("Humanist") Paradise.

That, my friends, is the fantasy called "Communism" in a nutty nutshell. In Communist ideology, "the proletariat is assumed to be a special breed". Well, a person's gotta be a special breed of stupid to believe that! (Yes, I'm looking at you, Lenin and Lennon!)

[*Selected Recommended Reading In No Particular Order:

The Naked Communist by W. Cleon Skousen

Basic Communism: Its Rise, Spread And Debacle In The 20th Century by Clarence B. Carson

Death By Government by R.J. Rummel

The Black Book Of Communism by Stephane Courtois, et al.

The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx

Humanist Manifestos I & II

Humanist Manifesto 2000: A Call For A New Planetary Humanism

You Can Still Trust The Communists To Be Communists (Socialists And Progressives Too) by Schwarz and Noebel]

.

GREATEST  BOOK  COVER  EVER!

.

NOT-SO-FUN FACT:

Many of the various types of Communists (Democrats and other Liberals, Socialists, Marxists, Antifa, etc.) like to label Right Wing Conservatives or Alt-Right as Nazis. Some do this out of ignorance, having been "edgeukkkated" (aka indoctrinated) by the Communist American University System, or by just being a member of the post-literate Millennial generation. And others do this out of deception, in order to miscast their enemies with an evil label as part of the Divide & Conquer tactic.

The term Nazi is simply a short nickname for National Socialist German Workers' Party. If the word "Workers" didn't tip you off (and it should have if you really know anything about Socialist tactics and propaganda) then surely the word "Socialist" did, yes?

Again, in a very easily understood nutshell explanation... The Nazis were simply a different flavor of Liberal (Leftist) scum. Unlike the Communists, they didn't pretend they were on their way to some fairyland of Humanist Paradise called World Communism. The Nazis were at the Dictatorship stage of "Socialism", and they intended to stay there.

The Commies have gotten away with categorizing real Nazis as Right Wing / Alt-Right / Conservatives by pointing out that during World War II the Commies fought against the Nazis. Therefore, if the Commies are on the Left end of the political spectrum, then the Nazis must be on the Right end of it, so they say. (Of course that wasn't until after the treaty of peace with the Nazis was transgressed and the two factions went at it.)

The bottom line is that the Communist Dictatorship and the Fascist Nazis were two different groups of Socialists. Since both of them intended to eventually rule the entire world, they both realized that one of the two groups had to be exterminated. Therefore the Liberals fought each other during World War II, each with their own long-term goal of world domination in mind.

Remember what you read above: "Socialism" is characterized by state ownership of land and all means of production. 

Whenever you find governmental leadership altering or manipulating laws and institutions in a way that lessens individual liberty, and negatively impacts private ownership and decision-making via enforced national and state regulations, you have found Socialism, which is usually Communism in the making. (Never mind that real, full secular Communism is an impossible fantasy of epic proportions!)

In order to institute Socialism, the state doesn't really even need to own the land and means of production, as long as it is able to control them by way of governmental restrictions enforced at the threat of confiscation and imprisonment.

.

.
If you found this blog bit boring because you were already aware of all this information, then I apologize and promise (like Ed Wood, Jr.) that "my next one will be better". But it was necessary for me to establish this factual foundation first, before I could really dig in to explain and prove the meaning of this post's title. I will get to the real Meat 'n' Tater Tots in Part 2.

.

Just for kicks, I'll leave you with something a bit more playful. Some of you are aware of my blog Battle Of The Bands. Let's do a quick spoof of that titled...

BATTLE OF THE COMMUNIST ANTHEMS (BOTCA)

.

.

Please feel free to cast a vote in the comment section below for which of these two Communist Rock Music anthems you prefer. And I will return here before too long to post Part 2 of 2 of this blog bit series.

.

I'D LOVE TO CHANGE THE WORLD by Ten Years After

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYRTK62pVWQ

.

IMAGINE by John Lenin

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bf2aEmmTeDQ

.

~ Stephen T. McCarthy

.

BIBLICAL FRACTALS (Bill, Hillary, Barack, President Trump) AND THE REVELATION 12 SIGN

.

Knowing that I read The Bible from G1 through R22 every year, someone asked me my thoughts about the Revelation 12 Sign. In typical fashion, I said, "Huh? The what?"

It's a true fact that I hadn't heard about it, but I promised to look into it during the week and to get back to her about it.

So, what do I think about it now? Well, hmmm... When it comes to "End Of The World" type prophecies, I'm a Missourian: "Show me." I've seen 'em come and go and... we're still here.

I will say this though: The Revelation 12 Sign is quite interesting. The fact that it coincides with a Jewish Jubilee year really got my attention. ("Huh? A Jewish Jubilee year? What's that?" See? Now you're doin' it.)

There's a lot ​of speculation on what might happen on Saturday, September 23rd. If I were forced to bet every drink I hope to consume for the rest of my life on this, I would bet that nuttin' significant will happen. HOWEVER!... there are so many intriguing facets to this thing that I believe something really might happen. If so, whatever it is will be pertinent to Jerusalem / Israel, and NOT some global event. Although, most things that happen regarding Israel do eventually have global implications over time. (You'd know why that is if you'd read your Bible.)

Some say we will be struck by something from space. Some say the Revelation 12 Sign marks the beginning of the 7-year Biblical "Tribulation" period. Wrong and wrong. I don't know what will happen -- if anything -- but I know it WON'T be either of those two things.

We'll know if there's anything to this Revelation 12 Sign soon enough. In the meantime, below I have embedded what I considered the best video I watched on this subject.

My search also led me to a couple of videos which featured Jonathan Cahn. If you don't know who he is, then you've obviously not read his astounding book THE HARBINGER. (I reviewed 'The Harbinger' and you can read my review by clicking here: Where Was God On September 11th?)

.

.

I wholeheartedly recommend that EVERYONE read 'The Harbinger'. If you think there is no God or that God does not concern Himself with the United States of America, then you MUST read 'The Harbinger'! Buckle that seat belt, strap that crash helmet on and get started. You are in for one amazing E-Ticket ride.

Anyway, this first video featuring Jonathan Cahn (and has little to do with 9/23) is practically a dog and pony show for the creepy Christian hosts to peddle their product. Just fast forward through the dumb commercials like I did. Cahn (who can say a prayer like nobody's business!) has some incredible things to say and some eye-opening, head-shaking insight into the patterns or "templates" of The Holy Bible. Or as David Haggith put it in his essential book 'End-Time Prophecies Of The Bible': "A better metaphor for understanding the complex patterns between history and future (as seen by the prophets) may be derived from the recent mathematical discovery of fractals. Fractals are complex patterns formed by simple patterns that repeat at multiple scales."

(At this point, I know I'm starting to scare the atheists: "Whoa! He sounds serious, and sounds like he knows what he's talking about. Click off blog NOW! Must avoid all evidence of God!!")

If you're more interested in what may (or may not) occur in just a couple days from now, the third video below is for you. It's also an excellent little primer on basic Christianity if you're not really informed about what God and Jesus have done, are doing, and will do. (Being a "Maverick Christian", I don't necessarily agree with every single point the host makes about things like the "Rapture", but it's still an overall excellent video. And who knows? Maybe he has it more righter'n I do. Best to always keep an open mind when the evidence seems to warrant alternative viewpoints.)

Please lemme know in the Comment Section what y'all think o' this stuffs, eh? You can click the URL links for a bigger picture:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAEeWA9f-p0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdVvnfj8aks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xn_l2yS6H2o

~ Stephen T. McCarthy

2029

.
Even a broken a-hole is right twice a day...
.
SOMEBODY'S COMING -- Todd Snider
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5I1dSS_izY

.
Hey, DogGs, DogGettes, Atheisitic A-Holes, and Andrew Leon Libtards... Somebody's coming Who don't need your vote!!
.
You have until [link:] 2029 to get your shit diarrhea together. After that, cryin' won't help you; prayin' won't do you no good.
.
Talk to the Man. For cryin' out loud, He turned at least 150 gallons of water into wine! (That's 757 bottles of wine!!) You have a better friend than that, do you?...
.

.

.

"JESUS SAVES"... And Surfs.

.
~ Stephen T. McCarthy
.