FLIP-FLOPPIN’ MORMONBOY PREPARING TO “TAKE A DIVE”?

.
So, on my computer’s homepage the other night I see this story headline: ‘Romney's Wife Says Woman Being Eyed For Ticket’.
.
I clicked on it and it takes me to, I dunno, some dog-doo “entertainment” website where I read the following:

Mitt Romney's wife has confirmed a tidbit about the vice presidential search process her husband largely has been keeping secret: He's considering choosing a woman.

"We've been looking at that, and I love that option as well," Ann Romney told CBS News in a joint interview with her husband that was broadcast Thursday. She added: "There's a lot of people that Mitt is considering right now." […]

Officially, the campaign says Romney is doing what he's done for the past decade — enjoying family time during a weeklong holiday in New Hampshire. […] But unofficially, the bit of down time is a chance for the contemplative Romney to consider who to tap for the No. 2 slot, how the campaign is going and whether to adjust strategy in a contest that polls show is close.

Romney declined in the interview to describe the status of the vice presidential search, saying: "That's something I'm keeping close with my team." He also didn't respond to growing calls within Republican circles for him to shake up his staff after a series of missteps. Among them: his campaign's initial refusal to side with Republicans who agree with the Supreme Court that the penalty included in President Barack Obama's health care mandate amounts to a tax. Romney eventually agreed with that assessment and, in doing so, broke with a key spokesman.

All that has conservative opinion leaders, including media titan Rupert Murdoch, calling for Romney to shake up his top staff. GOP officials in key states also are increasingly calling on Romney to talk about issues beyond his key message - that the economy remains weak under Obama - and to be more specific about what he would do as president.

.

The first thing I want to comment on is this: “All that has conservative opinion leaders, including media titan Rupert Murdoch, calling for Romney to shake up his top staff”?

Rupert Murdoch, the main man behind Fox News, is a “CONSERVATIVE” opinion leader? If you think so, you don’t know much about the American political paradigm. (And you sure don’t read this blog on a regular basis.)

Oh, sure, Rupert Murdoch is a “faux-conservative opinion leader”, but as a member of the global government-promoting, U.S. sovereignty-dismantling ‘Council on Foreign Relations’ (CFR), his beliefs are as far removed from the conservative ‘Constitution of the United States of America’ as are the beliefs of  Marxist president Barack Obama, our Kenyan leader.

Do I really think that Mitt Romney might be considering a female running mate? Well, it’s certainly possible. You don’t think his Mormon wife (the only one we’re aware of anyway) would have stated it publicly without Mitt’s direct or at least tacit approval, do ya?

Now is Mormon Mitt REALLY considering putting a female on the ticket, or is that just to make him appear open-minded? Or was this a ‘trial balloon’ meant to gauge the American voter’s response to the idea?

Knowing that Barack Obama has pretty much cornered the market on the Black vote (not that there’s anything “racist” with that), and with Obama’s recent political move to gain a monopoly on the Latino vote by un-Constitutionally legislating an amnesty for many illegal Mexican immigrants, perhaps Mitt feels he needs to try cornering the market on the non-Black female vote. And perhaps Mormon Mitt thinks that naming a woman as his running mate (a la John McCain’s similar, unsuccessful ploy in ‘08 with Sarah Palin) might buy him the White female vote.

I’m going to propose a completely different viewpoint for you to consider: as the article said, this is “a contest that polls show is close”. Perhaps it’s too close for comfort. Mitt Romney is probably in serious danger of winning the next presidential election and it is imperative that he do something to hurt his chances.

You have no idea what I’m yakking about, do ya? Read on...

Would naming a woman running mate gain Mitt some female votes. Yep, undoubtedly. But it would also lose him some White male votes because, 1) there are no really ‘household name’ female political leaders, so anyone he taps will be viewed as ‘Palin II’ by the media, and 2) there are men who will refrain from voting for Mitt if a woman is just a bullet’s width away from the presidency. In the final analysis, I personally believe that naming a female for the vice presidency would result in ‘few or no-votes-gained’ for Mitt, and that’s the “best case” scenario.

But if it is determined that making that move might help cost him the election, Mitt will likely be urged by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) members to make it.

See, the bottom line is this: The ‘New World Order’ agenda (a One-World Global Government) can be advanced quicker under the stewardship of a “progressive” (i.e., Democrat/Marxist), who doesn’t need to pretend he’s ‘CONSERVING the traditional, old-school, Founding Fathers’ American Constitutional Republic position.

Under the “leadership” of a supposed “conservative” (a Republican) the socialization/globalization process of the U.S. must occasionally be slowed down slightly for the sake of public delusion. Because the Republican party must pretend that it stands for smaller government and individual liberty in order to keep We The People divided ‘n’ deluded into believing that there is a real cultural/political war going on (between Repugnantcans and Dumb-O-Crats), the Republican party must sometimes apply the brakes slightly on our descent into totalitarian corporatist slavery.

The truth is, the International Banker Oligarchy (or “Illuminati”) directs the CFR, and the CFR directs both major political parties. Any perceived differences in the two major political parties is a (thin) smoke screen for public consumption purposes only. And whenever possible, it is preferred by the Elites that the Democrats (read: “Marxists”) win the presidential elections so that the road to the “New World Order” can be driven at top speed.

This next election is going to be close. Too close for comfort for the Illuminati. Naturally, the Democrats/Marxists will do everything they can to steal votes, and naturally the Republicans/Corporatists will allow them to get away with most of it. And I have little doubt that Mitt Romney will shoot himself in the foot when directed to do so.

.

In my third issue of ‘Sex, Tattoos & Violence R Us’ (August, 2009), under the heading “JOHN McLAME”, I wrote the following:

.

Did you notice how when the principal concern of Americans was the war in Iraq, and when it was clear that most of the country was tired of it and wanted to see the troops returned home, John McCain publicly said he would be fine with it if we maintained American soldiers in Iraq for one hundred years? He said the last thing that most Americans wanted to hear at that time.

And then when our financial system started to tank and the economy superseded the Iraq War as the single most troubling issue for most Americans, McCain chose that time to publicly announce that he thought “the fundamentals of our economy are strong.” Again, the worst thing he could have said if he wanted to be elected president of the United States. How odd that McCain had a special knack for saying the last thing he should have said in each instance. It’s almost as if HE SECRETLY DIDN’T WANT TO WIN THE ELECTION.

.

Having his wife mention the possibility of a female running mate for Mitt Romney may have been a “trial balloon”. More likely it was just a ploy to make Mormonboy seem contemporary, or “with it”. However, if the Insiders doing the deep research determine that selecting a certain woman can be “sold” to the public as a viable, “kinder and gentler” Republican move, while simultaneously undercutting his chances of actually winning the White House, I am sure that Mitt Romney will be told by the Wizards behind the curtain, “that’s the ticket!”

.

Hell, it’s all here:

"X-Y-Z: THE MECHANIX OF AMERYCAN POLITICZ" [Abridged Version]

~ Stephen T. McCarthy

YE OLDE COMMENT POLICY: All comments, pro and con, are welcome. However, ad hominem attacks and disrespectful epithets will not be tolerated (read: "posted"). After all, this isn’t Amazon.com, so I don’t have to put up with that kind of bovine excrement.

.