THE TRUTH ABOUT TRUTH:

All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed.
Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.



Tuesday, July 10, 2012

OBAMA’S SOCIAL-IST SUCK-URITY SWINDLE (Or, BEST EVIDENCE OF DEMOCRAT / REPUBLICAN CONSPIRACY?)

.
.
.
I am not aware of the existence of a single official government document, free of all weird, unexplainable anomalies and signs of forgery, that would indicate Barack “USAP” Obama was born in the United States of America. Nor do I believe that such a document COULD exist, because Obama is blatantly lying when he says he was born in Hawaii. (Not that there’s anything wrong with that. “Lying” is the stock in trade for Marxists who live by the credo, “The End Justifies The Means”. Lying is as natural as breathing to a Communist like Obama.)
.
Whether we’re talking about Obama’s Birth Certificate, his Selective Service Registration Form, or his Social Security Number, there is obvious evidence that all of these items were not only forged, but forged quite badly. One could accurately determine with just a cursory examination of the evidence I’ve supplied on this blog, or less than an hour’s worth of reading at WorldNetDaily (the only news site I know of that is willing to investigate and expose the many lies of the Marxist in Chief) that Obama is lying about having been born in the U.S.A.
.
It’s obvious why Obama would lie about it and why the liberal mainstream media would cover for him by refusing to publish and broadcast the facts. The really BIG, important question is why have the supposedly conservative news outlets and talking heads let him get away with it? Why have FOX NEWS FAUX NEWS, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Bill O’Reilly looked the other way? Don’t tell me they don’t know - politics is their livelihood and their life’s blood!
.
But some have done worse than just look the other way; some so-called “conservatives” such as Glenn ‘Marshmallow Head’ Beck and Michael Medved have publicly mocked the “birthers” – a pejorative nickname given to those people who are brave and patriotic enough to stand up and publicly state that Obama is lying about having been born in America.


The most common argument to explain the so-called “conservative” talking heads’ and the Republican party’s refusal to address this issue is that they fear being labeled as “racists”. Yeah, OK, that argument might fly for some of them (e.g., “Marshmallow Head” and “Brain-dead Medved” are definitely big pusses), but would that excuse fly for ALL of them?

I can put a nail in that coffin and bury it with just one name: Ann Coulter.

Ann Coulter is 99-times the man Beck and Medved are, and is anybody going to tell me that Ann Coulter is a-skeered of being labeled a racist? No freakin’ way! That woman would take on all the racist-label-spewing retards and whup all their asses (with half her brain tied behind her back just to make it half fair!)

And yet Ann Coulter is also one of those who has not only ignored the obvious forgeries presented by Obama to the American public, but she has also publicly poked fun at “the birthers”. The sad thing is, she KNOWS the “birthers” are right - she’s too sharp NOT to know!

So the question becomes: Are both political parties in cahoots with the Council on Foreign Relations, which is in cahoots with the International Banker cartel, and all of them are conspiring to deliver the American people into the hands of the globalist, economy-manipulating, power-worshiping, demonic “New World Order” oligarchy?

Is there another valid explanation? I’d love to hear it if there is. (Don’t give me that “fear of the racist label” bit, because Ann Coulter alone takes that argument off the table.)

Many times at ‘Ferret-Faced Fascist Friends’ I have pointed out for my few readers the obvious signs of forgery in Obama’s Birth Certificate and Selective Service Registration Form. Probably no more than once or twice have I referred to the allegation that Obama is using a phony Social Security number. Reason being, I hadn’t yet seen enough evidence to convince me that I could make that charge confidently and boldly (and you know I don’t say ANYTHING in a meek way; it’s bold or nuttin’ at all).

Well, that has now changed, and I’m prepared to state that Obama is using a fraudulently acquired Social Security card number. (Gee! Color me “shocked”.)

Below are excerpts from an article that appeared less than a week ago on WorldNetDaily. God bless the dogged dedication to truth of Susan Daniels, a woman 70+ years old! If only a majority of Americans were made of that old woman’s patriotism and fearlessness.

Susan filed a lawsuit against Obama after she went through the process of making herself an authorized write-in candidate, which ought to give her standing in a court of law.

Many previous valid lawsuits against Obama (e.g., that of Alan Keyes, et al.) have been summarily dismissed - the court (falsely) claiming that the accuser did not have “standing” to file the suit. Basically, standing is legalese meaning that the accuser was somehow harmed by the defendant and is therefore able to legally enter a charge against him/her.

In truth, all of the previous accusers DID have standing, regardless of whether or not they had filed the necessary paperwork to make them an opponent of Obama’s in an election. You see, the Constitution of the United States is a contract between the various States and the people of the States with the federal government. Any citizen who believes that the federal government, or representatives of the federal government, have broken binding agreements of that contract with the people, should have standing to file a lawsuit.

But up to now, the courts have deceptively denied that the complainants had legal standing to file their charges against Obama. Why? Well, isn’t it obvious? Just like the two major politcal parties, just like all of the mainstream media outlets, just like most of the state politicians, the courts are ruled and dictated to by the “New World Order” oligarchy. This interlocking system of abuse is massive and in near-total control!

Do I think that the courts will allow Susan Daniels to actively pursue her lawsuit against Obama? Despite the overwhelming evidence that Obama is a liar and can produce NO valid, un-forged documentation to prove he was born in Hawaii, the courts will find some (illegal, unethical) way to dismiss Susan Daniels’ lawsuit. But it will be interesting to see what trick the courts pull out of their hat (or ass), because this time they’re going to have to get pretty creative, as Daniels has looked ahead and covered her bases.

Below are excerpts from the WND article about the Susan Daniels investigation and Obama’s illegal Social Security number. If you wish to read the entire article, I have provided a second link to it at the conclusion of these excerpts:

.
If Barack Obama has an immediate eligibility problem, it is more likely to derive from the Social Security Number he has been using for the last 35 years than from his birth certificate.

Ohio private investigator Susan Daniels has seen to that. On Monday, July 2, she filed suit in Geauga County (Ohio) Common Pleas Court demanding that Jon Husted, Ohio secretary of state, remove Obama’s name from the ballot until Obama can prove the validity of his Social Security Number.

Daniels, who has vetted thousands of Social Security Numbers for numerous other clients, has done her homework. In her filing, she thoroughly documents her contention “that Barack Obama has repeatedly, consistently, and with intent misrepresented himself by using a fraudulently obtained Social Security Number.” […]

To acquire appropriate standing in court, Daniels has gone to the trouble of establishing herself as a valid write-in candidate for president. Before she is through, this 70-something mother of seven, who has been a licensed Ohio PI since 1995, may cause Obama more trouble than the Romney campaign.

Daniels started her investigation in August 2009. Given her profession, she has been able to access a variety of proprietary databases. What she learned without much trouble is that Obama has been using a Social Security Number with the prefix “042″ since 1986.

As she discovered, the “042″ number is reserved for the exclusive use of individuals who register in Connecticut. When she ran 10 sequential numbers before and after Obama’s, all returned with the documentation “issued 1977-1979 in CT.”

When Daniels ran the numbers immediately flanking Obama’s, she came to the firm conviction that Obama’s number was issued in March 1977 in Connecticut.

By all accounts, as Daniels thoroughly documents, Obama was then a 15-year-old living in Hawaii. There is no record of him even visiting Connecticut in or near this time frame.

To have gotten a Social Security card at this time Obama would have had to show up for a “mandatory in-person interview.” This could not have taken place in Connecticut. Obama’s sister, Maya, by contrast, uses a number appropriate for a Hawaiian resident.

Daniels checked other databases as well to validate her findings, including the Massachusetts Department of Motor Vehicles and the IRS. Yes, Obama used the 042 number to get a driver’s license when at Harvard and as recently as on his 2009 income tax return. […]

The ample evidence Daniels gathered led her to believe that the 042 number Obama has been using “had previously been issued to another person,” one who lived in Connecticut between 1977 and 1979 and who was born in 1890.

Link:
- WorldNetDaily
.
~ Stephen T. McCarthy
.
YE OLDE COMMENT POLICY: All comments, pro and con, are welcome. However, ad hominem attacks and disrespectful epithets will not be tolerated (read: "posted"). After all, this isn’t Amazon.com, so I don’t have to put up with that kind of bovine excrement.
.

9 comments:

  1. This is all interesting, but I'm sure it will go nowhere like everything else. For any of this to be address properly it would require some logical thinking and these days most logic in government is thrown out the window.

    Such as:

    1) The belief of the State of California that illegals should be allowed to obtain driver's license. (Doesn't that sanction breaking the law?)

    2) Invalidating Arizona's desire to have people produce proof of citizenship when breaking the law, saying that it would be "racial profiling". Duh--if someone looks Hispanic and can't speak English, it may be profiling, but it's logical to pursue the issue.

    3) The Texas situation of wanting to require positive ID to vote. We need ID for just about everything else so why not voting? Here in California it would be easy to just go into the poll and vote under other people's names if I had the address of registration and knew they weren't voting. I can see all sorts of opportunities for voter fraud and I would be gladly willing to produce my ID to prove I'm the guy I say I am.

    4) Condemning Assad and Kadaffi for fighting against rebels. If there were pockets of armed insurrection in our country I guarantee that the military would quash them immediately if the resistance continued. We have no business assisting in civil war that will replace one bad power with another that's equally bad or worse.

    I don't think logic really enters much into American government or politics, so I don't think most people care that much about the legitimacy of Obama's citizenship. And I think there is great illogic to come.


    Lee
    Tossing It Out

    ReplyDelete
  2. BOIDMAN ~
    You know I'm pretty much in agreement with your points here. Even with your assessment that ultimately nothing is going to be done about this situation despite the "transparency" that Obama is lying and knowingly presenting forged documents to We The People.

    Anyone who has objectively investigated these issues even briefly KNOWS that Obama is a criminal and is not eligible to hold the office of President. He should have been impeached and removed long before now, but instead, he will be permitted to run for a second term and might well win.

    But there is something in your comment that I must dispute. You wrote...

    >>...these days most logic in government is thrown out the window.

    and

    >>...I don't think logic really enters much into American government or politics

    On that point I must fully disagree. There is nothing the least bit illogical about ANY of the points you raised above; they all make perfect, reasonable sense.

    That has actually been one of the most frequently addressed issues of this blog. In fact, I would say it is the PRIMARY PURPOSE of this blog to illustrate why all of these seemingly "illogical" things that Uncle Sam and our State governments do are not at all illogical, oversights, missteps, honest errors, bonehead moves, nonsensical blunders, or incomprehensible foreign and domestic policies.

    The second a person introduces the "New World Order" concept into the equation, every single one of those "illogical" situations makes good sense. They are calculated, by design, to destroy the American Republic so it can be rebuilt and incorporated into a single global government.

    If in fact the unstated goal of our leaders and policymakers is to "MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO SO ALTER LIFE IN THE UNITED STATES AS TO MAKE POSSIBLE A COMFORTABLE MERGER WITH THE SOVIET UNION" [to quote H. Rowan Gaither, former President of the Ford Foundation], then tell me which of your points would still seem "illogical"?

    ~ D-FensDogg
    'Loyal American Underground'

    ReplyDelete
  3. I see your point and would agree. I suppose it could be said that logic is in the mind of the one who is doing the reasoning.

    There does seem to be a plan underfoot that is being well executed according to some strategy, but not everyone who is playing the government games is in on it. There is logic, but logic is not always equally logical to all parties.


    Lee
    Tossing It Out

    ReplyDelete
  4. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
    ~ Thomas Jefferson
    'The Declaration Of Independence'

    FDR once said, "In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way."
    ...
    The INSIDERS are counting on your being too preoccupied with your own problems or too lazy to fight back while the chains of slavery are being fastened on you. They are counting on their mass media to con you, frighten you, or ridicule you out of saving your freedom, and, most of all, they are counting on your thinking you can escape by not taking part in opposing their takeover.
    ...
    Remember, the INSIDERS don't care how much you know about their conspiracy so long as you don't do anything about it.
    ...
    Some people wake up and give up in the same week. This is, of course, just exactly what the INSIDERS want you to do.
    ~ Gary Allen
    'None Dare Call It Conspiracy'

    Above all else, Americans today love their bread and circuses. That love will surely lead them into the Totalitarian Nightmare that has been planned for them.
    ~ D-FensDogg
    'Loyal American Underground'

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm shocked. A fake SS number? What will they think of next. I'm thinking why don't you make it easy on yourself and do some investigative reporting by looking for one piece of documentation on BO that IS real. Library card, Costco membership, anything at all. I got $100 that says you probably can't find a shred of reality out there.

    As usual the comment box is as interesting and informative and the blog piece itself. The public has been indoctrinated, calculated, and manipulated into running screaming into the arms of the likes of the TSA, the Patriot Act and other such atrocities all in the name of correction, protection and defection from everything that our government should be. What a crock?

    Logic? Yeah,it's logical if you know the 'real' agenda. Ever been to a stockyard/meat packing plant. Cattle are funneled into chutes that direct them exactly where they want them to go, all the while thinking in their tiny bovine brains, they are making decisions. I wonder if the American public can hear themselves saying 'MOO'.

    I don't sound too cynical do I?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think this all stems from jealousy that O' had his picture taken with Pooh and you didn't!

    I thought I remembered discussing the SSN issue with you a while back, so I'm surprised that the article is so recent (unless I'm remembering wrong).

    Sadly, you nailed it with your second-to-last sentence.

    Americans love the bread and circuses.

    Give them another "Resident Evil" or "Iron Man" sequel, and the injustices being perpetrated on them by presidents of BOTH political parties over the last couple of decades are soon forgotten, if not entirely unnoticed.

    This should outrage any Americans left with the stones to be outraged.

    LC

    ReplyDelete
  7. FAE ~
    Yes, I am as certain as you are that no one could produce one single authentic government document - free of any trace of anomaly, forgery, or questionable taint - that would indicate Obama was born in the U.S.

    What are the odds that every single document pertaining to Obama's American citizenship contains at least one weird, unexplained aberration? For crying-out-loud, at what point does it cease to be coincidental and become signs of fraud and forgery?

    And when the signs are so abundant and blatant, and influential Republicans in the media not only refuse to seriously discuss it but instead publicly mock those people who are stating these verifiable facts truthfully, does that not indicate some secret agenda which they are a party to?

    When so much evidence points to Obama's ineligibility to hold the office of President and to crimes committed designed to cover-up that ineligibility, but the Republican Party refuses to investigate and make that evidence known to the public at large, what can we conclude but that there is a conspiracy to keep Obama in office for as long as possible and the Republican Party has entered into that conspiracy!

    I liked your analogy to cattle being herded through chutes at a stockyard all the while thinking that they are making their own decisions. Very good! The American people, by and large, are cattle, sheep, and asses.

    ~ D-FensDogg
    'Loyal American Underground'

    ReplyDelete
  8. DISC DUDE ~
    No, you are probably remembering very correctly; I'm sure I did discuss the Social Security Number in private conversation with you long ago.

    The accusation that Obama was criminally using the SSN of a dead Connecticut man goes back to BEFORE the 2008 Presidential election. I have discussed it briefly, but I have never made a major issue of it on this blog before because until now I was not completely certain that the accusation could be proven correct. (You know, I may seem like a loose cannon at times, but in actuality I guard my credibility carefully and make sure I can factually defend everything I write.)

    But with the evidence that Susan Daniels has uncovered, I am now certain that Obama's SSN is as phony as his Birth Certificate and Selective Service Registration Form. (Not that I'm surprised; just "sure").

    You know, Disc, only in a country where the government, the media, and the people are almost entirely corrupt could a person get away with what our Kenyan in Chief has.

    The people choose to defend their political party (fools!) and/or a criminal, based on his race (racists!), over the truth. That makes them traitors to their country. The people are at war against their own liberty (the U.S. Constitution) and they are more responsible for the decline of this nation than are the politicians.

    Marxists will be Marxists, we can't expect them to act any differently, but We The People were supposed to remain vigilant against encroaching despotism, and yet most Americans weren't. The People will get EXACTLY what they argued for and deserve.

    ~ D-FensDogg
    'Loyal American Underground'

    POSTSCRIPT: There's even more about Obama's falsehoods that I have not addressed on this blog because it's too complicated. But in short, Sheriff Arpaio's investigation uncovered a suspiciously missing microfilm pertaining to Obama.

    Old records for him - if they existed - would have been preserved on this microfilm. But wouldn't you know it? The only roll of microfilm missing from the archive is the one that would have included the material related to Obama.

    In other words, you can't prove that Obama's record is NOT on that microfilm (when it ought to be) if you can't locate the microfilm!

    Obama is nothing more than ONE MASSIVE LIE; a lie that many Americans are willing to overlook.

    ReplyDelete
  9. ANONYMOUS ~
    Try again. But this time I suggest you read 'Ye Olde Comment Policy' at the bottom of this blog bit and obey it.

    In other words, remarks like, "Anyone who calls Barack Obama a fraud is, in fact, a racist, bigoted lyinh hypocrtical scumbag!" are not only going to get your comments deleted rather than posted, but they take all the fun out of the debate that might otherwise have occurred.

    What do I mean by that? Well, a statement like that tips your hand (think: poker). It gives premature evidence that the mind behind it has absolutely ZERO chance of besting me in a debate.

    I would prefer that a Liberal (i.e., Marxist) who initiates a debate with me, not post "spoilers". I mean, there's already no question that I will annihilate you in a political debate, but must we let the readers of my comment sections know that fact even before I have had the opportunity to carry you for a few rounds prior to administering the knock-out blow? You take all the suspense out of the outcome!

    Seriously, I invite you - I "URGE" you even - to reword and resubmit your comment, paying attention to the guidelines in 'Ye Olde Comment Policy' this time. Because I would like nothing better than to publicly debate and destroy you.

    And next time, can't you post your comment under a name, even if just a pseudonym? Nothing screams "girlie" so much as a comment posted under the unoriginal identity of "Anonymous".

    Unless you are THE Anonymous - the famous Greek philosopher - can't you be creative enough to at least come up with some identity? It's not as much fun to slaughter some no-name person in a debate. Because later, when people ask me, "Who'd you kick the crap out of?" I'll be forced to say, "I'm not sure."

    Go ahead, reword your comment and resubmit it. I WANT YOU TO!

    ~ D-FensDogg
    'Loyal American Underground'

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: COMMENT MODERATION IS ACTIVATED. All submitted comments that do not transgress "Ye Olde Comment Policy" will be posted and responded to as soon as possible. Thanks for taking the time to comment.