OBAMA’S SOCIAL-IST SUCK-URITY SWINDLE (Or, BEST EVIDENCE OF DEMOCRAT / REPUBLICAN CONSPIRACY?)

.
.

.
I am not aware of the existence of a single official government document, free of all weird, unexplainable anomalies and signs of forgery, that would indicate Barack “USAP” Obama was born in the United States of America. Nor do I believe that such a document COULD exist, because Obama is blatantly lying when he says he was born in Hawaii. (Not that there’s anything wrong with that. “Lying” is the stock in trade for Marxists who live by the credo, “The End Justifies The Means”. Lying is as natural as breathing to a Communist like Obama.)
.
Whether we’re talking about Obama’s Birth Certificate, his Selective Service Registration Form, or his Social Security Number, there is obvious evidence that all of these items were not only forged, but forged quite badly. One could accurately determine with just a cursory examination of the evidence I’ve supplied on this blog, or less than an hour’s worth of reading at WorldNetDaily (the only news site I know of that is willing to investigate and expose the many lies of the Marxist in Chief) that Obama is lying about having been born in the U.S.A.
.
It’s obvious why Obama would lie about it and why the liberal mainstream media would cover for him by refusing to publish and broadcast the facts. The really BIG, important question is why have the supposedly conservative news outlets and talking heads let him get away with it? Why have FOX NEWS FAUX NEWS, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Bill O’Reilly looked the other way? Don’t tell me they don’t know - politics is their livelihood and their life’s blood!
.
But some have done worse than just look the other way; some so-called “conservatives” such as Glenn ‘Marshmallow Head’ Beck and Michael Medved have publicly mocked the “birthers” – a pejorative nickname given to those people who are brave and patriotic enough to stand up and publicly state that Obama is lying about having been born in America.

The most common argument to explain the so-called “conservative” talking heads’ and the Republican party’s refusal to address this issue is that they fear being labeled as “racists”. Yeah, OK, that argument might fly for some of them (e.g., “Marshmallow Head” and “Brain-dead Medved” are definitely big pusses), but would that excuse fly for ALL of them?

I can put a nail in that coffin and bury it with just one name: Ann Coulter.

Ann Coulter is 99-times the man Beck and Medved are, and is anybody going to tell me that Ann Coulter is a-skeered of being labeled a racist? No freakin’ way! That woman would take on all the racist-label-spewing retards and whup all their asses (with half her brain tied behind her back just to make it half fair!)

And yet Ann Coulter is also one of those who has not only ignored the obvious forgeries presented by Obama to the American public, but she has also publicly poked fun at “the birthers”. The sad thing is, she KNOWS the “birthers” are right - she’s too sharp NOT to know!

So the question becomes: Are both political parties in cahoots with the Council on Foreign Relations, which is in cahoots with the International Banker cartel, and all of them are conspiring to deliver the American people into the hands of the globalist, economy-manipulating, power-worshiping, demonic “New World Order” oligarchy?

Is there another valid explanation? I’d love to hear it if there is. (Don’t give me that “fear of the racist label” bit, because Ann Coulter alone takes that argument off the table.)

Many times at ‘Ferret-Faced Fascist Friends’ I have pointed out for my few readers the obvious signs of forgery in Obama’s Birth Certificate and Selective Service Registration Form. Probably no more than once or twice have I referred to the allegation that Obama is using a phony Social Security number. Reason being, I hadn’t yet seen enough evidence to convince me that I could make that charge confidently and boldly (and you know I don’t say ANYTHING in a meek way; it’s bold or nuttin’ at all).

Well, that has now changed, and I’m prepared to state that Obama is using a fraudulently acquired Social Security card number. (Gee! Color me “shocked”.)

Below are excerpts from an article that appeared less than a week ago on WorldNetDaily. God bless the dogged dedication to truth of Susan Daniels, a woman 70+ years old! If only a majority of Americans were made of that old woman’s patriotism and fearlessness.

Susan filed a lawsuit against Obama after she went through the process of making herself an authorized write-in candidate, which ought to give her standing in a court of law.

Many previous valid lawsuits against Obama (e.g., that of Alan Keyes, et al.) have been summarily dismissed - the court (falsely) claiming that the accuser did not have “standing” to file the suit. Basically, standing is legalese meaning that the accuser was somehow harmed by the defendant and is therefore able to legally enter a charge against him/her.

In truth, all of the previous accusers DID have standing, regardless of whether or not they had filed the necessary paperwork to make them an opponent of Obama’s in an election. You see, the Constitution of the United States is a contract between the various States and the people of the States with the federal government. Any citizen who believes that the federal government, or representatives of the federal government, have broken binding agreements of that contract with the people, should have standing to file a lawsuit.

But up to now, the courts have deceptively denied that the complainants had legal standing to file their charges against Obama. Why? Well, isn’t it obvious? Just like the two major politcal parties, just like all of the mainstream media outlets, just like most of the state politicians, the courts are ruled and dictated to by the “New World Order” oligarchy. This interlocking system of abuse is massive and in near-total control!

Do I think that the courts will allow Susan Daniels to actively pursue her lawsuit against Obama? Despite the overwhelming evidence that Obama is a liar and can produce NO valid, un-forged documentation to prove he was born in Hawaii, the courts will find some (illegal, unethical) way to dismiss Susan Daniels’ lawsuit. But it will be interesting to see what trick the courts pull out of their hat (or ass), because this time they’re going to have to get pretty creative, as Daniels has looked ahead and covered her bases.

Below are excerpts from the WND article about the Susan Daniels investigation and Obama’s illegal Social Security number. If you wish to read the entire article, I have provided a second link to it at the conclusion of these excerpts:

OBAMA'S  SOCIAL  SECURITY  NUMBER  CHALLENGED

.

If Barack Obama has an immediate eligibility problem, it is more likely to derive from the Social Security Number he has been using for the last 35 years than from his birth certificate.

Ohio private investigator Susan Daniels has seen to that. On Monday, July 2, she filed suit in Geauga County (Ohio) Common Pleas Court demanding that Jon Husted, Ohio secretary of state, remove Obama’s name from the ballot until Obama can prove the validity of his Social Security Number.

Daniels, who has vetted thousands of Social Security Numbers for numerous other clients, has done her homework. In her filing, she thoroughly documents her contention “that Barack Obama has repeatedly, consistently, and with intent misrepresented himself by using a fraudulently obtained Social Security Number.” […]

To acquire appropriate standing in court, Daniels has gone to the trouble of establishing herself as a valid write-in candidate for president. Before she is through, this 70-something mother of seven, who has been a licensed Ohio PI since 1995, may cause Obama more trouble than the Romney campaign.

Daniels started her investigation in August 2009. Given her profession, she has been able to access a variety of proprietary databases. What she learned without much trouble is that Obama has been using a Social Security Number with the prefix “042″ since 1986.

As she discovered, the “042″ number is reserved for the exclusive use of individuals who register in Connecticut. When she ran 10 sequential numbers before and after Obama’s, all returned with the documentation “issued 1977-1979 in CT.”

When Daniels ran the numbers immediately flanking Obama’s, she came to the firm conviction that Obama’s number was issued in March 1977 in Connecticut.

By all accounts, as Daniels thoroughly documents, Obama was then a 15-year-old living in Hawaii. There is no record of him even visiting Connecticut in or near this time frame.

To have gotten a Social Security card at this time Obama would have had to show up for a “mandatory in-person interview.” This could not have taken place in Connecticut. Obama’s sister, Maya, by contrast, uses a number appropriate for a Hawaiian resident.

Daniels checked other databases as well to validate her findings, including the Massachusetts Department of Motor Vehicles and the IRS. Yes, Obama used the 042 number to get a driver’s license when at Harvard and as recently as on his 2009 income tax return. […]

The ample evidence Daniels gathered led her to believe that the 042 number Obama has been using “had previously been issued to another person,” one who lived in Connecticut between 1977 and 1979 and who was born in 1890.

Link:

OBAMA'S  SOCIAL  SECURITY  NUMBER  CHALLENGED

- WorldNetDaily

.

~ Stephen T. McCarthy

.

YE OLDE COMMENT POLICY: All comments, pro and con, are welcome. However, ad hominem attacks and disrespectful epithets will not be tolerated (read: "posted"). After all, this isn’t Amazon.com, so I don’t have to put up with that kind of bovine excrement.

.