Thursday, June 10, 2010


Back on February 21st, I posted here on 'Ferret-Faced Fascist Friends' the full-length version of "X-Y-Z: The Mechanix Of Amerycan Politicz", but that edition proved too lengthy. I believe that only one or two of my friends even bothered to read it to the end, and when a piece I've written can't even hold the attention of my friends, I know it's in trouble.

But there was too much research and too much work that went into composing "X-Y-Z" for me to allow it to die a quick and unnoticed death. So, I have decided to post a heavily edited version below for the MTV generation. Still, it's not short, but I feel it's important and worth a second look in its abridged form. Anyone who wants to read the unedited version should click HERE.


Many years of very intensive study of some highly credible sources has proven to me that the American political scene is governed like this:

International Bankers essentially control the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) which represents the Bankers’ corporate, political and media interests. The CFR, for all intents and purposes, directs both major American political parties, the Democrats and the Republicans, in both foreign and domestic policies.

Naturally, that’s putting very succinctly a political paradigm that is in reality somewhat more complex than that. Nevertheless, minute details aside, this is indeed how the American political scene basically operates. This represents the “Active Ingredients” in the “Product.”


The ultimate goal in American politics is to dismantle, piece by piece if necessary, the U.S. Constitution and its Bill Of Rights and to replace it with a Socialistic World Government.

In order to achieve this goal, the American People must be convinced that it is in their best interests to scrap the American system for the newly evolving global system. In other words, the American People and the form of government established by their Founding Fathers must be conquered. The first order of business in conquering the American voters is to “Divide” them.

To do this, their “leaders” must first set the “Bait”. The Republicans decry the eroding of Individual rights and the corrupting of the Capitalist system. The Democrats protest injustices against select Groups and insist that those greedy Capitalists should spread the wealth around. Both of these arguments are meant to appeal to different mind-sets and “Bait” those sharing these world-views. As the individual takes the bait offered, he finds himself aligned with one group or the other: Republicans or Democrats. Candidates and representatives from both parties know what they need to say in order to attract and retain their potential vote and support groups.

The Democrats primarily apppeal to the bleeding-heart emotion-based voters and those perceiving themselves to be disenfranchised. In other words, mostly to women and minorities. And the party says, “We are going to make the government help you!”

The Republicans reach out to the voter block which is more individualistic and objective; proponents of ‘individual rights’ and ‘limited government’. And the party says, “We are going to make the government get off your back!”

Both types of American Voters have now taken the bait and have been effectively “Divided” from each other.

As long as The People are divided and bickering amongst themselves, it’s not likely that they will ever raise their heads above the fray to see who the real enemy is. Keep The People involved in political warfare, party versus party, and infighting against one another, and they will never notice the barbed wire being wrapped around the battlefield where they are engaged in their combat. Then, at some point when the time is right, the leaders of the factions will announce that the war is over and all combatants are prisoners in the Global Concentration Camp. That’s what is really going down, folks; the sheeple are being encircled with barbed wire while they argue, sleep, and watch TV.

However, since tyrannical Big Brother Global Government is the ultimate objective, it’s important that the group opposing centralization of power and overbearing government regulation (i.e., the Republican party) is not allowed to be very successful. That’s where the “Switch” in the “Bait and Divide, Switch and Conquer” comes in.

Having been divided from those with the “more government” Democrat mind-set, the Republican voters are now carefully managed and controlled to ensure that they aren’t actually allowed to implement all of the reforms they are constantly promised by their Handlers - their Handlers being the movers and shakers within the Republican party.

The Republican leaders talk a great game but are careful to never reveal too much (like who established the Federal Reserve System, how and why; what the CFR is and what it seeks). They will speak often about unnecessary government departments and a need for fiscal responsibility, but once voted into power at either the Executive or Congressional level, they will immediately turn their backs on all that they had previously claimed to represent. In reality, the voters are given a choice between Socialist-R and Socialist-D. The Council on Foreign Relations doesn’t care which brand of Socialism the Americans elect because the CFR directs both camps.

This is the reason that the size, scope and cost of government has never been reduced regardless of whether it was being controlled by Democrats or Republicans. Smaller government is the exact opposite of what remains the secret goal of BOTH political parties. The voters are Baited; Divided; and in the case of the Republicans, they get their “products” switched; and in the end, all of the American Principles – Constitutionalism, Rule Of Law, Individual Rights, a Republican form of government – will be conquered.

To you registered Republicans I ask this: Did you never question why it was that even when your party won the elections the longstanding Republican “smaller government” platform was never installed? Did you never notice that a pattern had developed, as if some secret force was preventing your party from fulfilling its promises even when the majority of voters had sided with you?

Did you REALLY believe that it was only by accidental or unpremeditated shifts in legislation and domestic policy that the United States of America somehow wound up moving so far to the Left of where the country once stood? Did you REALLY think that our slide into Socialism was just a natural evolution or political progression? You thought all of this Leftward movement occurred without forethought and lots of planning and manipulation from influential people behind the scenes – even within your own political party? Or did you ever pause long enough to even consider this at all?


This next section of the Blog Bit contains some excerpts from the book ‘Philip Dru: Administrator’ written by Edward Mandell House and first published in 1912.

Edward Mandell House was most likely the single most influential man of American politics of the last 100 years. He was an important advisor to President Franklin Roosevelt and the right-hand man to President Woodrow Wilson. House was no outsider nor a simple speculator of the inside story on political intrigue. He was the real deal when it came to behind-the-scenes manipulation.

‘Philip Dru: Administrator’ was ostensibly a work of fiction, but in the poorly written novel, Edward Mandell House revealed the way things really work in Washington D.C. and the end result that the political conspirators are aiming for. Read these excerpts and contemplate long and deep what House is really saying here:
Chapter XII – “Selwyn Seeks A Candidate”
Selwyn then began carefully scrutinizing such public men in the States known as presidential cradles, as seemed to him eligible. By a process of elimination he centered upon two that appeared desirable.

One was James R. Rockland, recently elected Governor of a State of the Middle West. The man had many of the earmarks of a demagogue, which Selwyn readily recognized, and he therefore concluded to try him first.

. . .Selwyn settled back in his chair, nodding his approval and telling himself that he would not need to seek further for his candidate.

At Rockland’s earnest solicitation he remained over another day. The Governor gave him copies of his speeches and messages, so that he could assure himself that there was no serious flaw in his public record.

Selwyn cautioned him about changing his attitude too suddenly. “Go on, Rockland, as you have done in the past. It will not do to see the light too quickly. You have the progressives with you now, keep them and I will let the conservatives know that you think straight and may be trusted.

“We must consult frequently together,” he continued, “but cautiously. There is no need for anyone to know that we are working together harmoniously. I may even get some of the conservative papers to attack you judiciously. It will not harm you. But, above all, do nothing of importance without consulting me.

“I am committing the party and the Nation to you, and my responsibility is a heavy one, and I owe it to them that no mistakes are made.”

“You may trust me, Senator,” said Rockland. “I understand perfectly.”

Chapter XIV – “The Making Of A President”
Selwyn now devoted himself to the making of enough conservative senators to control comfortably that body. The task was not difficult to a man of his sagacity with all the money he could spend.

. . .It was a fascinating game to Selwyn. It appealed to his intellectual side far more than it did to his avarice. He wanted to govern the Nation with an absolute hand, and yet not be known as the directing power.

. . .In the meantime his senators were being elected, the Rockland sentiment was steadily growing and his nomination was finally brought about by the progressives fighting vigorously for him and the conservatives yielding a reluctant consent. It was done so adroitly that Rockland would have been fooled himself, had not Selwyn informed him in advance of each move as it was made.


Personalities are built up by the media and other political production machines behind the scenes, and these personalities are carefully groomed to appeal to the political factions and give the desperate voters the impression that a knight on a white horse is on the horizon and riding to their rescue.

Of course, over time, it eventually becomes apparent that Last Year’s Savior is just another politician and then the political machines replace him or her with This Year’s Model, which gets the voter blocks all enthused and reenergized for another round of Elect ‘N’ Renounce.

Three things I’m certain of: Despite all of the messianic allusions, BarackUSAPObama is not near smart enough to be the anti-Christ; Sarah Palin is just another politician who will ultimately disappoint her followers; and if Glenn Beck really represented any threat to the status quo, he damn sure would be removed from Fox News and stripped of his highly influential teaching position at C.B.U. (Conservative Brainwashing University a.k.a. “Fox News”).

First, let’s look at “USAP”. He came in as the most unrealistically praised presidential candidate since John F. Kennedy. And being the first Black U.S. President only raised the bar of expectations and the “hopes” even higher. PROMISE: That he was a new kind of politician offering an “unprecedented level of openness” or “transparency.” But here’s what the American People really got . . .

REALITY: He is so opaque that he won’t even allow the American People to view his original, authentic birth certificate to satisfy the demands of the U.S. Constitution.

Sarah Palin is “the new kid of promise on the block” but the real Palin is already showing through. PROMISE: That she is a new kind of “rogue” politician, honest and intent on cleaning up the mess in the political realm. But here’s what the American People would really be getting . . .

REALITY: [S]he flunked on the issue of honesty. An interview with ABC’s Charles Gibson zeroed in on Palin’s statement, made at the Republican National Convention and elsewhere, “I told Congress, ‘Thanks, but no thanks, on that Bridge to Nowhere.’ If our state wanted to build a bridge, we were going to build it ourselves.”

In fact, Gibson pointed out, she was lobbying for federal funding for the bridge before she was against it, and was against it only after it had become a political embarrassment. Well, every Governor lobbies for projects for her state, Palin countered in a desperate, artless dodge. But Gibson, to his credit, focused in on the duplicity of pretending to have been against it all along. Sometimes those doggone network news people, for all their liberal biases, get it right.
~ From The New American magazine,
“Rogue” Or Ruse? by Jack Kenny.
Jan. 4, 2010.

Now, I’ll admit that, as with Rush Limbaugh, I find that I often agree with what Glenn Beck says, but also like Mr. Limboob, it’s more what Beck DOESN’T say than what he does say that bothers me. And in some ways, Beck is even sneakier about hiding his Neoconservative roots than is Ol’ Rushbo. At least he pretends to dislike the Republicans as well as the Democrats, unlike Limboob who has always come across as that loud, obnoxious blow-hard in the Republican Rah!-Rah! rooting section.

But Glenn Beck, like all Neoconservative frontmen and frontwomen, dishes out his criticism selectively, being careful not to spill all of the beans to his audience.

The October 26, 2009 edition of The New American magazine contained a review of Glenn Beck's popular book 'Common Sense' in which writer Alex Newman made the following point:

After highlighting a variety of very real problems in the book, Beck chooses a new, unrelated, and surprising enemy: those who promote the notion of a global conspiracy. In an attempt to equate them with people who advocate violence, he cautions readers to “stay away from these individuals and those ideas” and also says that they “will eventually seek to impose their rule and lifestyle on all of us.” But after warning about those who claim a global conspiracy is afoot, he goes on to expose the increasing efforts to centralize power at the global level through the United Nations and assorted treaties. Does he really believe that the machinations of the global elites to consolidate power through the UN and other institutions of world order have nothing to do with — dare we say it — conspiracy? Here again, common sense is lacking in Glenn Beck’s ‘Common Sense’.

Beck may occasionally “attack the Federal Reserve judiciously but it will not harm them” (to paraphrase Edward Mandell House from his chapter “Selwyn Seeks A Candidate”). That doesn’t cost Beck very much and will only add to his seeming credibility.

But when is Beck going to go full “Constitutional” and tell his audience that the Federal Reserve was established by International Bankers and that it is still operated by International Bankers who have no real allegiance to the United States of America? When is Beck going to tell the American People exactly what the Federal Reserve does, why it does what it does, and why it MUST be abolished before this country can ever possibly recover? When is Glenn Beck going to tell the American People what the Council on Foreign Relations is and how it essentially dictates our foreign and domestic policy and influences the vast majority of what you see or hear on television and radio? When is Glenn Beck going to tell the truth, the WHOLE truth, and nothing but the truth?

Yeah, that’s right: never! Telling the truth to the American People could only cause change – REAL change – to come about. And real change is the very last thing that the Neoconservatives want.


The Hegelian Dialectic used in the realm of politics is a form of conflict resolution in which a condition (“Thesis” a.k.a. “Z”) is challenged or endangered by an opposing force (“Antithesis” a.k.a. “X”) and culminates in a resolution or compromise (“Synthesis” a.k.a. “Y”).

Today, we have an ideal example of The Hegelian Dialectic which we can look at in the form of ObamaCare. It is agreed upon at a certain level by our Social/Political Engineers behind the scenes that Socialized Medicine is the goal for a variety of reasons. But getting there can’t be accomplished in one big leap due to some citizen opposition. When a condition must be brought about in stages, the Elites, who manipulate our landscape for their own benefit, will utilize the Hegelian model.

The Republicans, pretending to fight for The Individual and professing a wish to retain the status quo, have set up at position “Z”. The Democrats, pretending to fight for The People and professing the need for an entirely reorganized and outright Socialized medical system, have set up at position “X”.

(Left) X ----------------------------------- Z (Right)

Everyone knows that a significant segment of the American People is still a bit squeamish about overt Socialism, so the move to “X” will have to be accomplished by degrees.

What will ultimately occur with the ObamaCare proposition is a compromise. The medical/insurance system we presently have will indeed be altered, but not to the degree that the Democrats are calling for. The Republicans will give some ground while engaged in “the good fight” and the Democrats will reluctantly accept a position to the right of their desired “X”. When the pseudo-fighting is all over, when the dust has settled and the smoke has cleared, you will find that we will have been moved left of “status quo Z” and met the Democrats at Y. The compromise at Y will be a semi-socialized system. This fake fight will eventually lead to this:

X --> compromise --> Y <-- compromise <-- Z

Afterwards, the Republicans will be able to say, "We defended America against the Liberals and managed to avoid X." The Democrats will be able to say, "We fought against the Right-Wing Extremists and we managed to get Y for The People."

But the next time this issue is brought to the table, the Democrats will set up at “W” and the Republicans will be defending the NEW status quo at “Y”.

(Left) W ---------------------------------- Y (Right)

After the phony fight is over and the two parties have made their compromises toward the “center”, the healthcare issue will stand at “X” which, of course, is where the socialistic Democrats had intended to take us all along and the point that the Republicans knew they would eventually reach during the process of “yielding a reluctant consent” (to again borrow a phrase from Edward Mandell House).

W --> compromise --> X <-- compromise <-- Y

Make no mistake about it, both political parties knew all along that our destination would be “X” because it was determined by the Council on Foreign Relations which guides (read: “directs”) both the Democrats and the Republicans.

This formula is played out over and over again in both the Big Colosseum (at the National level) and in the smaller arenas (in the state legislatures). And this, ladies and gentlemen, is one of the most ingenious tactics by which our elected representatives have been able, over time, to move this country ever Leftward into Socialism and Big Brother Statism.

A variant of this Hegelian Dialectic model in which both political parties work in concert might look something like this:

Let us suppose that Uncle Sam sought to gain control of a segment of the Middle East in order to control the flow of oil reserves or for any other strategical geopolitical purpose. The American Government could establish justification for a Middle East invasion by maneuvering according to the X-Y-Z Hegelian formula.

The “Z” or Thesis would be to create a frightened American citizenry concerned about its safety

The “X” or Antithesis would be to promote the idea that a madman in the area that Uncle Sam hopes to invade has weapons of mass destruction and is, one way or another, a genuine threat to American security.

The “Y” or Synthesis is to invade the madman’s territory, take him into captivity and install a puppet regime or new “democratic” government in that area which has a more favorable view of American interests.

By establishing a condition (Z), and by setting up its opposition (X), and by proposing a compromise or resolution (Y), any predetermined outcome can be surreptitiously stage-managed by a government in order to move the masses in any desired direction.

My Mother (God love her) passed away in 2005, but I still have her old Social Security card. Printed on the card just below the line upon which she signed her name is this: “For Social Security Purposes * Not For Identification”

Of course, these days, one can scarcely visit a restroom in a Federal Building without first having to provide their Social Security number for identification. So, how did you reach this point where you are constantly required by your Big Brother Government to “show your papers”? Take a guess. Anyone? It’s as easy as X-Y-Z.

How have they been able to get away with this unnoticed for so long? That’s easy! One can put anything over on a populace that, rather than safeguarding its civil liberties, wastes its time watching Survivor, American Idol and Buffy The Vampire Slayer when not reading fluff fiction by Dan Brown, John Grisham, J. K. Rowling and all the others.


Once a person comprehends the targeted “Endgame”, which is Global Government designed and orchestrated by a world body of wealthy Elites, all of the assumed stupidity and insanity emanating from Washington D.C. on a regular basis suddenly takes on a very rational, understandable, and in fact, even predictable, character.

A stupid person doesn’t become influential in Washington D.C. and non-stupid people don’t consistently do stupid things. The experienced Chess Player who makes what appears to you to be illogical moves on the board is in fact playing the game of chess at an advanced level beyond your comprehension. Odds are that you aren’t far from being checkmated.

If you think they’re dumb in Washington, you’re the REAL dummy, and the upcoming, smug pronouncement of “global checkmate” will soon confirm that.

Ladies and gentlemen! - all off for ‘Collapsing Dollar’.
Next stop: ‘Global Currency’.

~ Stephen T. McCarthy


Marx Vs. Keynes: Comparative Socialism In Miniature

#1 Rule Of Politics

Palin Backs Off The Bridge

Glenn Beck’s B.S. – 2/17/2010
[Watch The End Of Part 2 & The Start Of Part 3]

YE OLDE COMMENT POLICY: All comments, pro and con, are welcome. However, ad hominem attacks and disrespectful epithets will not be tolerated (read: "posted"). After all, this isn’t, so I don’t have to put up with that kind of bovine excrement.


  1. Stephen-

    This one seems familiar...

    Actually I have a suggestion. This one is long-if you remember when I read it before, I could not remember the Hegelian section.

    This could have easily been broken into five separate posts, as there were five distinct "chapters."

    Why don't you try running the unedited version over five days?

    Just a thought...

  2. Stephen--
    I read it all from start to finish. May I offer some advice without intending to offend you. There is enough different material in this post to make at least 3 to 5 shorter posts. You cover several topics. I just feel like you'd get your point(s) across in smaller doses that would allow thoughts to digest and questions and dialogue to occur.

    My questions for now:

    Are you surprised by any of what you are talking about?

    What do you think the outcome of all this will be?

    How is the United States different (or the same) than the rest of the world?

    Do you expect that your efforts, or even the combined efforts of those who are thinking like you, will do anything to change things?

    What does the Bible say about what you are talking about?

    I understand your concern about all of this, but I don't know if spending a lot of time worrying about it will accomplish anything. It's all fascinating. I spent at least an hour this morning watching Alex Jones videos on Youtube and aside from his annoying speaking presentition some of it was very interesting-- but I don't know that the information has any direct practical value other than inspiring me to continue to focus on Bible study.

    Between you and Gregg at Gospel Driven Disciples you're both giving me a lot to think about.

    That's my initial reactions.

    Thanks for reading this and for your suggestion. This abridged version is about half as long as the original. And yes, that idea about breaking it up into many very small sections was suggested before and again now.

    I just won't do it.

    For one thing, I feel that, as presented, each of these "chapters" represent individual segments of ONE story, or "scenes" that form a SINGLE "movie".

    I feel that breaking them up too much would cause the loss of the sense that I'm trying to project, which is that these "chapters" all tell the story about the way Americans are manipulated into voting all of the usual suspects into power, and how all the usual suspects are able to continually shift the country leftward, by degrees, deeper and deeper into statist Socialism.

    I fear that posting the sections individually over a period of time will cause the reader to lose "The Big Picture" and forget that there is a clear theme running through each section as it progresses to the next. It would be like watching one scene per day of some movie and expecting to be able to understand all of the connections by the time one reaches the end credits. The flow and sense of continuity would be lost.

    However, the readers (yourself and others) keep suggesting I break it all up, so maybe y'all are right and I am wrong.

    But then there's also that stubborn streak in me that doesn't want to give into the new MTV/Sound-Bite mentality. You know, I'm thinking: Why should I have to stoop to a reader's short attention span? Let the reader exercise and increase his or her mental stamina and ability to concentrate for... what? 15 to 20 minutes?

    And then finally, I come back again to that far left Liberal blogger Existentialist Cowboy. Many (if not most) of his Blog Bits are longer than mine. He's even using a much smaller font, so even those Blog Bits that he's written which appear to be equal in length to mine, undoubtedly still contain more words! And yet this Lib has over 200 Followers.

    Either his writing is far superior to mine (although he bores the crap outta me), or else it is just as I have suggested several times in the past: Liberals are more dedicated to their political cause than Conservatives are to their own, and Liberals don't mind taking the time to really dig in and read a lengthy political piece, while "Conservatives" would prefer to be entertained by short columns by the likes of Ann Coulter, and TV and radio productions by the likes of Glenda and Rushbo.

    I honestly suspect that Libs - for all of their faults which are far too numerous to list here - are actually more serious-minded and more dedicated to Liberal principles than Conservatives are to conservative principles. I think we're mostly a lazy, complacent bunch. And that's why we are going to lose the political war.

    But I'm glad YOU read "X-Y-Z", because I really did put a lot of work and time into composing it.

    ~ Stephen
    "As a dog returns to his own vomit,
    so a fool repeats his folly."
    ~ Proverbs 26:11

  4. rLEE-b ~
    --> "There is enough different material in this post to make at least 3 to 5 shorter posts. You cover several topics. I just feel like you'd get your point(s) across in smaller doses that would allow thoughts to digest and questions and dialogue to occur."

    No offense taken. But read my response to DiscConnected (above).

    My answers:

    1) Not exactly sure what you mean by the question. But, nothing surprises me after 16 years of in-depth study on this subject. Am I surprised that men would conspire to enslave their fellow men? Certainly not. We all understand about human nature. What DOES surprise me, however, is how apathetic and resigned most men and women are to BEING enslaved.

    2) The outcome is that men and women will lose their liberty until Jesus returns to free them.

    3) Being secretly run by the richest and most powerful men on the planet, the United States has relinquished its opportunity to be a good example to other nations, has sunk into an abyss of moral depravity, and is now spreading its wickedness abroad in the form of American Imperialism. We are a nation that is sick, sick, deathly sick.

    4) No. Because the American People are (as I said to DiscConnected above) "mostly a lazy, complacent bunch" who prefer bread and circuses to liberty.

    5) The Bible says that there will indeed be a global government ('Bye-'Bye U.S. Constitution!) that will be ruled by a beast, and that "in the last days, perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, TRAITORS, headstrong, haughty, LOVERS OF PLEASURE rather than lovers of God." [2 Tim. 3:1-4]

    However, I suspect Jesus - whenever He returns - will take a dim view of those who did nothing to try to counteract all of this because instead they took the complacent position: "Well, The Bible says it's all going to happen anyway, so why fight it?"

    Are we not supposed to be working while there's still light? Are we not supposed to be trying to increase the worth of the talents entrusted to us while the Master is away? Is there ANY passage in The Holy Bible that encourages us to roll over and play dead or just sit on our hands while awaiting the return of our Savior?

    --> "I spent at least an hour this morning watching Alex Jones videos on Youtube and aside from his annoying speaking presentition some of it was very interesting"

    Well, I'm glad you were looking into it. I would suggest better, more Christian sources, however, are the books "NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON: 25 YEARS LATER" by John Stormer, or "ONE WORLD" by Tal Brooke.

    But I think if we can show people that our country and the world is shaping up to look exactly as Biblical prophecies said it will at the End Times, it strengthens our argument that people need to get right with God NOW, while they still have that chance.

    And furthermore, if by educating ourselves and then others, we could manage to forestall the inevitable for even a generation or two, wouldn't that be a good thing for your grandchildren?

    ~ "Lonesome Dogg" McD-Fens

  5. Cleaning my mailbox-- sorry for going back in time, but I must have been saving this for a reason.

    Just wanted to make a point about your reference to Ex Cowboy and his long posts and over 200 folowers. Doesn't mean they are all readers. If you're will to take the time to do it you can get the 200 and still write crap. I looked through a few of his posts (didn't read though--too long!). When you scroll down you see that if he gets any comments at all, there are only a few and most of them are his and the others are the same people leaving windbag comments. You've been getting more comments than he does so it looks like a much larger % of your followers are reading.

    I wouldn't use that guy as an example.

    Tossing It Out

  6. LEE ~
    That's not how I remembered things from the last time I had visited ExCow's blog (which was some time ago). But hoping you were correct, I just now went there, and I gotta say... that's STILL not the way it appears to me.

    It's true that half of his comment totals represent his responses to those who comment, but the same could be said of MY comment totals.

    And I gotta say, he does receive a fair number of "Anonymous" comments, so it's impossible to determine how many of those represent different individuals.

    But it still seems to me that of those comments in which the identity of the person posting is known, he's still drawing feedback from a fairly impressive number of different individuals. I did not see a lot of repetition (i.e., the same "Joe Blow" leaving comments on a lot of ExCow's various blog bits).

    So, although I WISH you were right - I really do! - I scanned the comment sections of approximately his last 15 posts and it still appears to me that ExCow's readership and influence is far, far more impressive than is mine. But I'm not surprised.

    ~ D-FensDogg
    'Loyal American Underground'

  7. I now make the connection for Global Government. That would give the CFR the power, world wide.

  8. Actually, JUDY, the CFR would not really have worldwide power. This thing goes much deeper than you have ever dared to imagine. I have previously described the CFR as:

    ...the visible moving parts, the meshing gears, the framers and roofers and electricians building “The New World Order” structure from the blueprint provided by the "architects" hidden from public view - the "wizards" behind the curtain.

    In fact, the CFR is just the operational apparatus visible to the general public. The real controllers are essentially more obscured, or less viewable by We The People. The real threat to our liberty is International Bankers, and not so much the CFR, which is really just an organization that is manipulated from behind the curtains by the bankers.

    I understand that this all sounds crazy to you, as it sounded to me when I was first turned onto it by a friend. But one thing I can promise you: the more you study this, the less crazy it will seem and the more understandable the seemingly insane political realm will become.

    Everyone starts out a skeptic, and the more everyone researches it, the more convinced everyone becomes of a (gasp!) massive conspiracy!

    And don't forget that your own Christian Bible tells you that there will eventually be a global government. So, why should the idea that many individuals are currently constructing a Global Government, even as we type our responses, come as a surprise to any of us Bible-believing persons?

    ~ D-FensDogg
    'Loyal American Underground'

  9. ObamaCare was an excellent model for your X-Y-Z. I fear that Guns may be another. In fact, we can throw pretty much any "hot" issue that the Democrats are firmly on one side and Republicans firmly on the other and use the X-Y-Z model. It makes me ill.

    I spoke with someone after reading one of your initial NWO posts, emailed the link to your site, and then talked to this person about it. I was shocked. That person, a die-hard Republican who is very active at the local and state level, said to me that he knew all about the Bilderberg Conspiracy talk, but just couldn't waste any more time on it. It detracted from the "real issues." I was shocked. I told him that all those real issues were camo for what the Bilderberg Group was doing, which was installing socialism in order to implement their NWO, which he was apparently very familiar. It all fell on deaf ears.

    Does this happen to you? Do you meet people who have researched this and still don't believe it? They would rather focus on the dog and pony show going on in DC?

    1. HiYa, ROBIN ~
      This was a very good comment and an excellent question. I didn't have time to respond last night because my computer time was all taken up posting comments on my latest F-FFF blog bit.

      And right now I have to get ready for work. But tonight, sometime after I get home from my day job, I will return here and reply in full.

      Also, I read the discussion you and DiscConnected had on his latest at 'Back In The USSR'. I hope to get over there sometime tonight as well and put in my .02 cents on that topic. My view will be slightly different from yours and LC's, and it might even surprise one or both of you slightly.

      DiscDude isn't always real quick in publishing submitted comments, but if you're at all interested, you should check back at '...USSR' at some point, because I definitely intend to submit a comment there.

      Yak Later, Robin.

      ~ D-FensDogg
      'Loyal American Underground'

  10. Part 1:

    ROBIN ~
    First, I want to say that it is for comments like yours that I spend my free time blogging.

    A long time ago (circa 1985) a young woman I was crazy about told me that she thought I'd find success, but I would never make it big. Rather, she thought I'd have a very devoted but somewhat limited "cult following". And that was BEFORE I'd ever even heard of the NWO and I knew almost nuttin' about politics.

    Well, she was wrong. I never found success. But she was also right. The little influence I've had has been of the "cult" variety - very few people, but those few have recognized me as a reliable source for (unpleasant) truth.

    >>... I fear that Guns may be another. In fact, we can throw pretty much any "hot" issue that the Democrats are firmly on one side and Republicans firmly on the other and use the X-Y-Z model.

    You definitely “GET IT”. But I discerned early on that you are intelligent and able to cut through the B.S. and to the heart of a (political) matter.

    Guns? No question about it. Honestly, every single issue that has the potential to divide us and/or preserve our Constitutional foundation is being targeted for the X-Y-Z treatment.

    It took them 100 years to accomplish it, but the communists (backed by and funded by the NWO Insiders) have managed to infiltrate every single thread of our social/political fabric and commandeer it.

    The game is OVER. The ONLY thing that could possibly save this country now is something that I can’t endorse (as a believer in the clearly articulated anti-violence Principles of Christ Yeshua), and that is a full-blown violent revolution.

    The NWO and its (useful idiot) communist puppets COULD be run out of town if a sufficient number of Americans became patriotically educated (never gonna happen) and began assassinating these traitors in the streets and in the government buildings. History shows that communists are utterly useless as warriors. The reason they’ve always resorted to deception and infiltration is because in combat they get their asses kicked soundly and quickly. Our Founding Fathers would rout all of the Bill Clintons, Dick Cheneys, and Barack Obamas.

    But the Founding Fathers are gone, and the Americans are on Welfare and Life Support. And in ‘The Holy Book’, our future “is written”.

    >>... I spoke with someone after reading one of your initial NWO posts, emailed the link to your site, and then talked to this person about it.

    Offhand, can you recall WHICH of my NWO posts you Emailed to him?

    Continued Below...

    1. Part 2:

      >>... Does this happen to you? Do you meet people who have researched this and still don't believe it? They would rather focus on the dog and pony show going on in DC?

      Well, to begin, let me say that you are 100% accurate in your assessment. The “real issues” have NOTHING whatsoever to do with the minutiae of bogus bullshit bills coming out of Washington D.C. The “real issues” have nothing to do with the Democrat Vs. Republican “dog and pony show”. The REAL ISSUES have to do with the transgressions – committed by BOTH mainstream political parties – against the U.S. Constitution. Most importantly, the transgressions against Article 1, Section 8, Clause 5, and the 10th Amendment. It’s no exaggeration to say that a strict adherence to those two Constitutional laws could save the U.S.A.

      But saving the U.S.A. is not the goal of anyone in D.C. not surnamed “Paul”.

      I know DiscConnected personally (he and I used to work for the same company). After awhile our discussions graduated from sports to politics (and later religion / spirituality). Eventually, I purchased for DiscConnected a copy of the masterpiece tome ‘THE CREATURE FROM JEKYLL ISLAND’ by G. Edward Griffin. It took him awhile, but he finally got around to reading it.

      Later, he admitted to me that when he and I first started yakking about politics, he thought to himself: “Stephen sure has some strange ideas about politics.”

      Well, having read some books and magazines I recommended to him over the years, he now knows that my “strange ideas” were the “truth”. And that’s true of a few other blog buddies of mine (e.g., Br’er Marc and The Flying Aardvark).

      The fact is this: NO ONE can objectively research the NWO subject and fail to recognize it as TRUTH, not “theory”. As you’ve seen, some of the conspirators have brazenly acknowledged their ultimate goal in print – in books, and in magazines like ‘Foreign Affairs’ and even the mainstream magazine ‘Time’. (NEVER allow anyone to dismiss the NWO as a “conspiracy THEORY”. There is NOTHING theoretical about a voluntary confession on the part of some of the conspirators!)

      There can be only TWO types of people who dismiss the NWO agenda as less than the “real issues”: those who have not sufficiently researched it and thus have not realized the overwhelming amount of evidence that PROVES it; and those who know of it but hope to personally benefit from it.

      Some people will wave their hand and say they’ve “heard all about it and dismissed it” because their ego doesn’t want to admit that YOU are more politically astute and educated than they are. And then there are those who really DO know about it, but they’re willing to go along to get along – recognizing that they might have something to gain by quietly accepting the way of “this world”.

      Obviously, I don’t know the man you referred to here, but I can GUARANTEE you that he falls within one of the two aforementioned categories. There is not a third option for ANYONE who dismisses the NWO Conspiracy Fact.

      He’s either more ignorant about it than he wants you to know, or he’s a traitor to his country. (And feel free to tell him that I said so. If he wants to debate me about this, he can bring it on right here. I haven’t lost a political debate in 20 years.)

      Great comment, my friend!

      ~ Stephen
      ‘Loyal American Underground’

      POSTSCRIPT: Guess I’ll have to comment at ‘Back In The USSR’ tomorrow night. Bed (and work in the morning) calls.

    2. I am going to reply to pretty much everything you said through the lens of the conversation that I had with that guy I referred to your blog. I think he falls into category number one. He retired from the military and fancies himself political savvy. The idea that I might know more than he about anything political is out of his wheelhouse of thinking... even if I don't actually "know the material in and out." Even if I just stumbled on the material and am still in the early stages of learning it. Even so... whenever we have talked politics he has always been in the more "learned" position given that he's older, lived more, and invests a lot more time in it. So, there's the backstory.

      So, I think his "research" of the Bilderbergers actually equated to "I've heard of that and someone like Glenn Beck said it was a conspiracy and I dumped it in File 13." Of course, he did NOT say that, but I suspect that is the TRUTH.

      I don't remember which post I referred him to here. He told me that he "skimmed it." That tells me that he didn't even read it. He saw that it was about the NWO, and decided that he knew it all already. Case closed.

      Now, he and I have talked about how disenfranchised people are becoming and the possibility for that "full blown violent revolution" that you refer to as the only thing that could stop the plan. He sees it as a real possibility. I am more skeptical. He says that in the American Revolution only 3% of the population took up arms to separate us from England. He seems to think that 3% would be enough to do it today. I suppose that if it were the "right," as in skilled 3% that knew who the enemy was, he would be right. The problem is that too many people are blinded by the Dog and Pony Show and have no clue who the enemy is. It makes it difficult to win a war when you don't know who the enemy is!

      All I know is that it has changed how I view the goings-on in Washington D.C. And I do wonder about my Liberal Friends. I know that many of them see themselves as wanting to help others less fortunate, and things that are fundamentally good, but are being distorted and warped by this new incarnation of the Democratic Party. Many Independents and Republicans can see the Socialist Agenda. I think (many) Democratic voters will actually be the most shocked when this plan is implemented. (I am talking people my age and older who remember the platform or ideals of the Old Democratic Party and are still voting like it exists.) It wasn't all bad and that is how they are still hooking people today. The fact that people are voting for a dream or memory makes me sad. The fact that people think their vote still means something makes me more than sad.

    3. Part 1:

      ROBIN ~
      I agree that Category #1 is the most likely when considering your Republican friend. I always assume a person falls into Category #1 unless evidence begins to indicate that I should suspect them of being in Category #2.

      I’m referring there to “average citizens” and NOT people who hold positions of power or influence. Those in positions of power and/or influence usually fall into Category #2. For example, it would be totally illogical to think that persons whose very livelihoods are earned in the political arena and who rub elbows regularly with policymakers and other important political figures DO NOT really know about the NWO. As “The Congressman” said, it is not possible to climb as high on the political ladder as he had without learning the underLYING truth - without learning about “The Wizards Behind The Curtain”.

      And I would argue that people like Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin are every bit as high on this country’s political ladder as any single 5-term Congressman from one state. I KNOW that those aforementioned celebrities fall into Category #2 and ultimately are not friends of genuine American patriots and of the U.S. Constitution.

      But, yes, the average person, I automatically assume falls into the first Category. They merely “think” they know what’s going on and have stopped far short of a serious investigation into the extensive amount of evidence that is readily available to everyone.

      >>... So, I think his "research" of the Bilderbergers actually equated to "I've heard of that and someone like Glenn Beck said it was a conspiracy and I dumped it in File 13." Of course, he did NOT say that, but I suspect that is the TRUTH.

      For most mainstream “thinkers”, that’s usually enough for them to base their opinion on. If someone they believe they can trust, someone who makes a lot of money to keep them informed, makes a pronouncement about something, they take it as gospel and never research it deeper for themselves. And it NEVER occurs to them that the “great American” they’ve been listening to on talk radio for 15 years might actually be an Insider who is deliberately deceiving, dividing, and conquering them. The Americonned Sheeple are such trusting little lambs who are being led right to the slaughterhouse.

      Continued Below...

    4. Part 2:

      >>... that "full blown violent revolution" that you refer to as the only thing that could stop the plan. He sees it as a real possibility. I am more skeptical. He says that in the American Revolution only 3% of the population took up arms to separate us from England.

      I have not researched that topic sufficiently, but my reading leads me to believe that the number was considerably higher than 3%.

      For instance, the following comes from Ron Paul’s book ‘THE REVOLUTION: A Manifesto’:

      “Contrary to what many Americans have been taught, a majority, not a minority, of the colonists supported the fight for liberty against Great Britain. ... John Adams is often misquoted as saying that one third of Americans supported the revolution... Adams was in fact speaking of American support for the French Revolution. Historian William F. Marina has shown convincingly that a majority of Americans supported the American Revolution.”

      And Ron Paul is a reliable source; he’s a true “Constitutionalist”.

      >>... The problem is that too many people are blinded by the Dog and Pony Show and have no clue who the enemy is. It makes it difficult to win a war when you don't know who the enemy is!

      I totally agree with you. Very few Americans even recognize the real enemy. They all think “it’s that OTHER political party!” Furthermore, so many American slaves have been conditioned to love their masters and the bones that their masters throw to them that a major uprising is simply out of the question.

      The reason I even mentioned a violent revolution is because I had in mind, and was alluding to, that famous quote from Thomas Jefferson. I just automatically assumed you are aware of it and so I didn’t even bother to actually write it. But just for clarification, below is what I had in mind while commenting on a second American Revolution:

      “...What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. ... What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure.”

      Jefferson also said, “I hold it, that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical.”

      But that was a different time, with a different sort of people – Americans who valued liberty over welfare.

      Incidentally, as for the Democrat party, it was corrupted even longer ago than you perhaps realize. In fact, the Democrat party was loaded with communists even back in FDR’s very first administrations. It’s been a long, long time since “Democrat” represented anything truly “American”.

      ~ Stephen

    5. I am sorry that this comment is going on and on...but there it is.

      Everyone is aware of the disenfranchisement. However, you are SO RIGHT: it is Republican vs. Democrat, Black vs White. In fact, this George Zimmerman trial highlights the race issue which has been blown out of proportion since Obama took office. They made the dude a "White Hispanic" in the media in order for it to be filled with racial tension and hate...instead of two minorities, which is what it is. I understand that the DOJ has even used their resources to stir the pot and the President (early on) made the comment that if he had a son he would look like Trayvon Martin... or something like that.

      I don't consider any of this to be coincidental. The Higher Ups sense that there could be an uprising and if arms are taken up they don't want the weapons pointed at THEM. So, everyone is stirring the pot and making sure that end-fighting will occur. Can you think of any other reason that the President would have the IRS target specific groups? It is all to encourage divisiveness and hate, so that if/when the floodgates of rage burst, the people behind the curtain are well and fully protected.

      Am I right or completely off the mark?

    6. ROBIN ~
      First of all, never apologize for multiple and extensive comments. I consider my blogging primarily an activity by which I can engage with others and discuss the topics raised. I'm sure you've noticed that at F-FFF, very often the comment sections are places where detailed discussions take place, and not just collections of "Nice post" remarks.

      I like to think of many of my blog bits as merely starting gates or jumping off points for dialogues. That's the hope I've always had for my blogging endeavors.

      Now, very interesting that you raised the Trayvon Martin / George Zimmerman news story because for several days now I've been thinking I should post a blog bit about it (you know, before the rioting begins).

      The fact that you raised it here, I am taking as an omen that I should write something about it on my blog.

      The whole "divisiveness" aspect is the MAIN CLUE to the entire trial. There's much more to this than the mainstream media wants the Americonned People to realize. (And when I use the term "mainstream media", I am ALWAYS also including the pseudo-conservative media outlets like Fox News and talk radio.)

      I was listening to Sean Hannity yesterday and yelling at the radio because his deliberate refusal to tell his listeners WHY the liberal media has spun the trial into a "racial" issue was really pissing me off.

      Last night, I was thinking about writing something about Obama's real worldview, tying it into the reason the pseudo-conservatives routinely tell their listeners only half of the story.

      Now that you've pretty much PUSHED me into the topic with your question, I have decided to make it a part of my next F-FFF blog bit.

      So, be watching for the next post ('THE POLITICS OF BEER...'), and we can pick up this very same conversation right there, if you'd like.

      ~ D-FensDogg
      'Loyal American Underground'

    7. Okay, then. THE POLITICS OF BEER it is.

      BTW, I have been looking for your comment on DiscConnected's Post. Have you posted it and he not published or did you (ahem) forget?

    8. Ha!-Ha! No, he hasn't NOT published it; and, no, I hasn't (ahem) forgotten.

      It's just that I (ahem) haven't gotten to it yet.

      I don't know why I fell so far behind this week, both in my blog reading and my commenting. I'm serious, too. Somehow I couldn't keep up but it's a mystery to me WHY I couldn't, because my normal routine stayed the same, and bloggers weren't posting more often than usual.

      I was pondering this a couple days ago. It's like there's missing time... but there isn't REALLY any missing time. (And I don't believe I was abducted by a UFO.)

      I still intend to comment at Disc's blog, but now I want to write this new blog bit first.

      ~ D-FensDogg
      'Loyal American Piss-Poor Timekeeper'
      (takes a licking and just stops ticking)


    ~ D-FensDogG
    'Loyal American Underground'


All submitted comments that do not transgress "Ye Olde Comment Policy" will be posted and responded to as soon as possible. Thanks for taking the time to comment.