For Part 1 click HERE:
.
“There are only two
kinds of people in the world.
I don’t like either
of them.”
~ Miss Ann Thrope
.
.
.
Now, I’ll
bet you think I’m going to say that the group most responsible for Barack Obama
being in the White House is Black voters and all the other Democrats.
Or maybe
you think I’m going to point the finger at Republican voters who failed to show
up at the polls to vote for Mitt Romney.
Or
perhaps you think I’ll blame The Tea Party people who refused to vote for
Romney - the lesser of two evils – because he just wasn’t “conservative”
enough.
No, nope,
and wrong again, Fishface!
OK, then
you think I’m going to say that the reason we have that grey Marxist Muslim
(President Marxslim) in the White House for a second term is because the
Dumb-O-Crat party cheated and voting was rigged to favor Obama.
Well, I
think that’s half right (in the same way that Obama is half Black). In my
entire life, I never followed a presidential election as closely as I followed
the 2012 election. I boldly said that Mitt Romney was going to win (which is
not to say that I like and voted for ‘Mittens’ - I don’t and I didn’t). But EVERY
SINGLE INDICATOR leading up the election pointed toward a Mitt
Romney win.
Yes, I do
my homework (no, I NEVER use the excuse, “My dog ate it”), and I don’t
like getting a failing grade, especially when I’m as confident of passing the
test as I was in the 2012 presidential election!
.
ELECTION 2012
Steve [not me] • 2 years
ago
Let's see.
Ballots not mailed to military.
Black Panthers at polling places.
Voting machines changing Romney vote to Obama.
GOP poll watcher forcebly removed from polling places.
No Photo ID required.
Obama murals in polling places.
Election Judges with Obama hats signing in voters.
25,000+ Dead on voter roles in San Francisco.
Announcing to Democrats only that absentee voters can have ballots printed at polls.
Ballots not mailed to military.
Black Panthers at polling places.
Voting machines changing Romney vote to Obama.
GOP poll watcher forcebly removed from polling places.
No Photo ID required.
Obama murals in polling places.
Election Judges with Obama hats signing in voters.
25,000+ Dead on voter roles in San Francisco.
Announcing to Democrats only that absentee voters can have ballots printed at polls.
Nothing here must be GOP paranoia.
Do I
think vote fraud contributed to Barack Oliar’s reelection? You bet I do!
Consider
the following:
*
In at least five voting districts in swing
states, Obama received 100% of the vote in the last election. Not one person
even made an error voting and cast a ballot for Romney. Not even one.
*
Several other districts in states such as Florida and Ohio, areas dominated by
Democratic operatives, the number of people who voted outnumbered those who
were registered.
.
.
The network switched to video of the 35th ward, where people
waiting in a school to vote were walking past a mural of the president, even
after Republicans sued to get it covered up.
“This remained untouched for hours as people voted!” said reporter Eric Shawn.
.
“Don't get me wrong - we were f#cked if Romney got elected, too.
I'd be dogging Mitt if he'd gotten the nod, it just would have been a little
more creative effort. ... I'm leaving the ‘Ron Paul’ sign on
my lawn so everyone knows not to blame me.”
PROOF OF VOTER FRAUD IN THE USA – FROM THE HORSE'S MOUTH
.
.
.
However,
all that being said, I’m still not putting the bulk of the blame on vote fraud. Below you
will find a large number of comments I left some time ago in the Comment
Sections of these fine bloggers’ blogs:
.
FAE’s ‘FAR AWAY SERIES’ blog
.
C.W.
Martin’s ‘TILTING AT WINDMILLS’
blog.
Downsizers' ‘OF POUNDS AND POLITICS’ blog
.
See if
you can figure out where I’m going with this. Can you predict beforehand where
I am going to lay the lion’s share of the blame for Barack “Marxslim” Oliar’s entire
presidential career before I reveal it in Part 3? (It’s really quite obvious because
I laid it all right out in the open in the following blog comments, not
anticipating at the time I wrote them that I’d ever collect them in one place
and reconstruct them as their own multi-part blog bit.)
Read the
following statements that I have made on other blogs and try to follow the
bouncing ball and connect the dots before I spill the whole can of beans in the
third and final installment of this series.
This
installment is rather lengthy, so you may want to read it in two or three
separate sessions:
Well,
indeed, there are not TWO political parties in the USA, and there hasn't been during the
lifetime of any of your readers.
There is only ONE political party: 'THE NEW WORLD ORDER' Party.
There is only ONE political party: 'THE NEW WORLD ORDER' Party.
And for
that reason, the march to the goal could be accomplished regardless of whether
a Democrap or a Repugnantcan sits in the White House. 'The New World Order'
Party doesn't care which affiliation the Americonned People choose during an
election.
Of course, the program can usually move toward the goal at a slightly faster pace when the Democraps are in control, so that's always attractive to The NWO Party.
But I am fairly convinced that in fact Obama did NOT actually win the election; there was an awful lot of voter fraud in the all-important swing states of Ohio and Pennsylvania that the Repugnantcans allowed to occur, and but for that, Romney would have won... just as I had predicted he would.
Regardless, Romney or Obama, it's the same goal and the same eventual result for the Americonned People.
The very fact that Barack Obama still sits in the White House when he could literally be in prison if the Repugnantcans wanted him there (due to federal crimes that Obama is truly guilty of), PROVES that the best friend Obama has is the Repugnantcan division of The NWO Party.
Of course, the program can usually move toward the goal at a slightly faster pace when the Democraps are in control, so that's always attractive to The NWO Party.
But I am fairly convinced that in fact Obama did NOT actually win the election; there was an awful lot of voter fraud in the all-important swing states of Ohio and Pennsylvania that the Repugnantcans allowed to occur, and but for that, Romney would have won... just as I had predicted he would.
Regardless, Romney or Obama, it's the same goal and the same eventual result for the Americonned People.
The very fact that Barack Obama still sits in the White House when he could literally be in prison if the Repugnantcans wanted him there (due to federal crimes that Obama is truly guilty of), PROVES that the best friend Obama has is the Repugnantcan division of The NWO Party.
>>... Consider Bob Dole running against Clinton 2. Quiet campaign,
hardly heard from him. Excuse: Ran out of $$$.
Yeah, your suspicion is more than justified.
In my recent blog bit comment exchanges with Bryan of the 'A Beer For The Shower' blog, I told him about an old friend of mine whose nickname was "Torch".
Torch was the son of a famous California Congressman, and because of that, Torch was actually traveling across the country in 1996 with Bob Dole during his presidential campaign.
I remember Torch later telling me in conversation how baffled he was by Dole's demeanor in private as opposed to his demeanor on the national stage. Torch said that on the plane, while flying from state to state, Dole was outgoing, quick-witted, funny, and extremely erudite. But as soon as the cameras were rolling, Dole turned into this boring old man.
At the time, I was still a political neophyte, having only just learned about the Illuminati and the Council on Foreign Relations two years earlier. So, like Torch, I figured that Dole was just camera shy, maybe uncomfortable in the national spotlight. And that's why his real personality just disappeared when the cameras started filming.
Now, all these years later, I know EXACTLY what was happening, and my earlier thoughts were merely the naive speculations of a political neophyte.
When McCain ran against Obama, the REAL goal of "The Wizards Behind The Curtain" was for Obama to win. And that's why McCain deliberately said things that ensured Obama's victory. (McCain told the war-tired Americonned People that he could envision the U.S. Military being in the Middle East for 100 years; he told the Americonned People who were disgusted by the Economic Recession that our economy was essentially sound. Only someone who secretly MEANT to lose the election would have said those things!)
Why did Bob Dole's brilliant personality disappear when he stepped off the airplanes? Because he knew his job was to LOSE the election to Bill Clinton - The Wizards' choice for president.
The same crap gets replayed time after time. And on those occasions when the Republican DOES accidentally win the election, he immediately begins acting like a liberal, big-government Demoncrat (think: George W. Bush).
Yeah, your suspicion is more than justified.
In my recent blog bit comment exchanges with Bryan of the 'A Beer For The Shower' blog, I told him about an old friend of mine whose nickname was "Torch".
Torch was the son of a famous California Congressman, and because of that, Torch was actually traveling across the country in 1996 with Bob Dole during his presidential campaign.
I remember Torch later telling me in conversation how baffled he was by Dole's demeanor in private as opposed to his demeanor on the national stage. Torch said that on the plane, while flying from state to state, Dole was outgoing, quick-witted, funny, and extremely erudite. But as soon as the cameras were rolling, Dole turned into this boring old man.
At the time, I was still a political neophyte, having only just learned about the Illuminati and the Council on Foreign Relations two years earlier. So, like Torch, I figured that Dole was just camera shy, maybe uncomfortable in the national spotlight. And that's why his real personality just disappeared when the cameras started filming.
Now, all these years later, I know EXACTLY what was happening, and my earlier thoughts were merely the naive speculations of a political neophyte.
When McCain ran against Obama, the REAL goal of "The Wizards Behind The Curtain" was for Obama to win. And that's why McCain deliberately said things that ensured Obama's victory. (McCain told the war-tired Americonned People that he could envision the U.S. Military being in the Middle East for 100 years; he told the Americonned People who were disgusted by the Economic Recession that our economy was essentially sound. Only someone who secretly MEANT to lose the election would have said those things!)
Why did Bob Dole's brilliant personality disappear when he stepped off the airplanes? Because he knew his job was to LOSE the election to Bill Clinton - The Wizards' choice for president.
The same crap gets replayed time after time. And on those occasions when the Republican DOES accidentally win the election, he immediately begins acting like a liberal, big-government Demoncrat (think: George W. Bush).
>>... Edward Snowden ... is currently hiding somewhere in Hong Kong, while
"patriots" like John Boehner call him a traitor.
My friend, it comes back, time and time and time again, to what I have spent nearly 20 years trying to convey to genuinely patriotic Americans: Forget what the two primary political parties in the U.S. "claim" to support, care about, and represent. The bottom line is ALWAYS this:
The Democrat and the Republican parties are two different sides of the EXACT SAME COIN. They are both controlled by and do the bidding of unseen puppeteers - namely, INTERNATIONAL BANKERS - and every bit of the so-called "fighting" between the two parties is meant solely for public consumption. The "endgame" is Divide And Conquer, and BOTH major political parties are IN ON IT.
There is no real difference between the Limbaugh/Hannity/Coulter faction and the Matthews/Obama/Pelosi faction. It's all a matter of getting you to root for Punch or Judy, while BOTH puppets are being controlled by the SAME PUPPETEER. I don't care how it looks, I don't care how different the arguments seem, the end result is ALWAYS THE SAME. (Political History proves this.)
When push comes to shove, the two political parties will always converge, rather than REALLY oppose each other. If one of the two parties GENUINELY represented limited, Constitutional government, then considering how often the two parties have traded positions of power in the government, we shouldn't have ALWAYS moved toward the Left! We should still be somewhere in the middle. However, in your lifetime and mine, there has been a constant move toward the Left, regardless of the party in power.
My friend, it comes back, time and time and time again, to what I have spent nearly 20 years trying to convey to genuinely patriotic Americans: Forget what the two primary political parties in the U.S. "claim" to support, care about, and represent. The bottom line is ALWAYS this:
The Democrat and the Republican parties are two different sides of the EXACT SAME COIN. They are both controlled by and do the bidding of unseen puppeteers - namely, INTERNATIONAL BANKERS - and every bit of the so-called "fighting" between the two parties is meant solely for public consumption. The "endgame" is Divide And Conquer, and BOTH major political parties are IN ON IT.
There is no real difference between the Limbaugh/Hannity/Coulter faction and the Matthews/Obama/Pelosi faction. It's all a matter of getting you to root for Punch or Judy, while BOTH puppets are being controlled by the SAME PUPPETEER. I don't care how it looks, I don't care how different the arguments seem, the end result is ALWAYS THE SAME. (Political History proves this.)
When push comes to shove, the two political parties will always converge, rather than REALLY oppose each other. If one of the two parties GENUINELY represented limited, Constitutional government, then considering how often the two parties have traded positions of power in the government, we shouldn't have ALWAYS moved toward the Left! We should still be somewhere in the middle. However, in your lifetime and mine, there has been a constant move toward the Left, regardless of the party in power.
>> . . . They truly think they will be a part of the
elite, ruling class when their agenda is completed.
That is
an excellent point and one that a few of my friends and I have discussed (and
laughed about) for some years now.
The
"Useful Idiots" are being USED, thus the word "useful",
obviously. But here's what the IDIOTS don't see coming because they have an
insufficient understanding of history and human nature:
After the
USEFUL IDIOTS have been all USED UP by their puppet masters in creating the new
utopia (read: Demonic Global Tyranny), they will be amongst the very first
people liquidated. Why? You know why and so do I.
Because
the real Elites will look at the former Useful Idiots and think this: You were
SO STUPID that you were incapable of discerning that I was using you to enslave
you and your fellows. And, I see how ready, willing, and able you were to turn
traitor against your own Constitution and against your own citizens. First of
all, we don't want someone as stupid as you in our own totalitarian society.
And secondly, a traitor like you is too dangerous for us to support and allow
to live. Therefore, you will die TODAY!
That is
exactly how the future is going to play out for these Useful Idiots but they
are too unintelligent and too unimaginative (thanks, Robin!) to envision that
future scenario. Downsizers, you and I will likely die as well, but at least we
won't die as stupid traitors to our own country! I think that's important; I
think that means something. There are things worse than death.
DOWNSIZERS
~
Well,
you've hit it right on the money. There is one additional fact that I want to
add to what you've said:
The
average garden variety Liberal is an idealist. They have never grown up enough to
put their big boy pants on and face the reality, face the plain facts that the
world they live in does not and never will line up with the ideal utopia they
imagine in their ill-functioning minds. Liberals are immature idealists and
very poor critical thinkers. The perfect little world they want to create can
never come about so long as the brutish nature of mankind makes dominating
one's fellow man such an attractive temptation.
All of
that is true of the average, feeling-over-thinking Liberal. But there is
another type of Liberal who is not just the poor-thinking, head-in-the-sand
idealist who stumbles along making poor judgments and is too egotistical to
acknowledge the errors of their so-called "thinking".
The
second type of Liberal I refer to is the outright Communist. This Liberal
understands completely that in order to remold society along Communistic lines,
he/she needs to first totally break down the old lifestyle; until our former
way of life has been razed, it's not possible to construct the new Communistic
society.
So to
THAT brand of Liberal, there are no "mistakes" being made; they are
not making foolish judgments and refusing to acknowledge the failure of their
actions. Their actual GOAL is to destroy our society from within - destroy us
economically, socially, morally, and spiritually. If anything they do
contributes in any way to that destruction, then they have NOT made an error in
judgment but have succeeded and inched closer to their actual goal.
Now, the
question is: But how many Liberals are really Communists as opposed to
unwitting dupes? The answer, according to my many years of research is: Lots of
them! Indeed there more "Useful Idiot" Liberals than there are
outright Communist Liberals, but there are still far more Communist Liberals
than most Americans realize, and many of them have risen to places of great
influence and power.
Barack
Obama is not just a Useful Idiot Liberal but an actual Communist. He's also a
tool of the New World Order elites, just like so many of the so-called
"conservative" Republican presidents (and Congressmen) who preceded
him in the White House have been tools of the New World Order elites.
I have
been covering this on my political blog for years; there is nothing new about
the betrayal - the Republicans, the "Conservatives", the Mainstream
Media, the so-called "Conservative Media" - it has all been ONE with
the Liberals for the longest time.
"They"
are masters of the Divide And Conquer tactic and they deceived the decent
people into believing that they represented their conservative, Constitutional
voices in politics. They never really did. Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reilly, Beck,
Colter ...I tried to get We The People to listen, to understand that those
phony conservatives were really selling them out by fighting over the piddling
details while never addressing the "real" MONUMENTAL traitorous
transgressions against our Constitution and way of life.
Only a
few listened; only a few understood what I was saying. The others focused
solely on the words, the rhetoric of the Republicans, and never paused long
enough to discard the words and examine ONLY what was DONE by
those pseudo-conservatives.
And now,
here we are: Some of the People are waking up, but it's way, Way, WAY too late
to postpone the inevitable. Done deal - just like God told us it was. "It
is written." No man can rewrite what God has written. Now we'll all deal
with it.
I was so
impressed with some of the comments you recently left on my friend Arlee Bird's
blog (regarding Gun Control) that I decided to start 'Following' your blog.
One wee bit o' quibble though with this blog bit:
One wee bit o' quibble though with this blog bit:
>> . . . Democrats create a crisis and then tell America that they are the
saviors and their plan is the only way to beat the "crisis" that they
created.
That's true enough, but to identify the Democrats solely is to leave half of our opposition out of the picture. The Republican party is secretly working with the Democrat party to deliver us into the prophesied global tyranny.
The Republican party says most of the right things (to get the "Conservative" vote) but DOES most of the wrong things. The Dems and the Reps are simply two different sides of the very same coin, as most of their actions (not their words) prove.
Anyway, I'm eager to see what you will be posting here, because your comments at 'Tossing It Out' were impressive and illustrated the fact that you know the direction that we, as a country, are going in, as opposed to the direction in which we SHOULD be moving.
That's true enough, but to identify the Democrats solely is to leave half of our opposition out of the picture. The Republican party is secretly working with the Democrat party to deliver us into the prophesied global tyranny.
The Republican party says most of the right things (to get the "Conservative" vote) but DOES most of the wrong things. The Dems and the Reps are simply two different sides of the very same coin, as most of their actions (not their words) prove.
Anyway, I'm eager to see what you will be posting here, because your comments at 'Tossing It Out' were impressive and illustrated the fact that you know the direction that we, as a country, are going in, as opposed to the direction in which we SHOULD be moving.
Hello,
DOWNSIZERS ~
I hope
you will not think me “argumentative” for returning to this post and responding
to your reply. It’s just that on my own blog, many of my readers and I engage
not in “a comment exchange” but in ongoing “discussions”. My friend Arlee Bird
has publicly stated that’s one of the primary reasons he respects my blog and
has recommended it many times to his own blog’s ‘Followers’.
You
wrote:
“I don't know if I agree if they [Republicans] are secretly
working with the Democrats but the outcome seems to be the same. Thanks for
pointing this out.”
Well, I’m
not quite done pointing this out (although this will likely be my last post
concerning the topic on THIS particular blog bit).
I’m sure
you’ll recognize the following paragraph:
“…mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are
sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are
accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably
the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under
absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such
Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”
That,
obviously, is the writing of Thomas Jefferson from ‘The Declaration Of
Independence’. Note that he called us to be watchful for “a design” of abuses
and usurpations, pursing invariably the same Object”.
When a
person decides to completely throw out ALL of the political rhetoric they’ve
heard from their “supposed” “Conservative” representatives, and evaluate ONLY
those representatives’ actions - divorced from their words - it becomes
painfully obvious that for a very long time “abuses
and usurpations” have occurred, weakening our Constitutional rights and
the country’s prosperity as a whole. In other words, it becomes evident that
there must be “a design” behind the slide to
the far Left.
To the
Left, ALWAYS a slide to the LEFT. Why is there NEVER a “compromise” to
the Right? Why does every political compromise ALWAYS lean toward the Left? If
you flipped a coin 100 times and it came up “tails” 100 times, wouldn’t you
begin to suspect that the coin was somehow “rigged”? And why should the political
realm – with two ostensibly opposing viewpoints but the same “winner” time
after time – be excused from that suspicion?
I’ll give
you just one recent example, although I could show this same “pattern” going
back for many decades.
In June
of 2012, ‘The Daily Beast’ had an article with the following headline:
.
Bear in
mind that John Roberts was “supposedly” conservative and was named as Chief
Justice to the U.S. Supreme Court by Republican president George W. Bush.
Here’s an
excerpt from the article mentioned above:
A sharply divided Supreme Court upheld the individual insurance
mandate in President Obama’s health care law on Thursday, handing the White
House a major victory on its major domestic achievement four months before the
election.
With protestors gathered outside the court's marble halls, Chief
Justice John Roberts revealed that he had joined the liberal wing in a 5-4
ruling that the federal government indeed has the power to impose a penalty on
those who fail to buy insurance - through its taxing authority, not under the
Interstate Commerce Clause, as the administration had argued.
It was a stunning moment because the media and political
establishments had essentially concluded after oral arguments that the mandate
was toast.
Well, it
was NOT a “stunning” moment for me! I could have predicted as much. Why?
Because throughout my entire lifetime (I’m 53) the actions of Republicans have NEVER
matched their rhetoric. (I’ve spent nearly 20 years studying this sort of thing
in great detail, and I’ve concluded that the REASON the actions never match the
rhetoric is because there is “a design” that
is being followed to deliberately undermine the Constitution and dissolve the American Republic, and BOTH of the two major
political parties are in on it. The political parties PRETEND to oppose
each other but that is only a ‘Divide And Conquer’ tactic being utilized
against We The People.
Downsizers,
in closing, I want to remind you of something that you yourself recently posted
on THIS blog:
545 VS. 300,000,000
PEOPLE
- by Charlie Reese
- by Charlie Reese
Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the
Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?
Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes? …
Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes? …
… If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.
If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red.
If the Army & Marines are in Iraq and Afghanistan it's because they want them in Iraq and Afghanistan …
If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red.
If the Army & Marines are in Iraq and Afghanistan it's because they want them in Iraq and Afghanistan …
… Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there
exists disembodied mystical forces like “the economy”, “inflation”, or
“politics” that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.
Beware of
Liberals in Constitutionalist’s clothing!
Hello
again, DOWNSIZERS ~
I really
did not intend to post another comment on this installment of your blog, but
since you asked me a question, I’ll answer it. And I thank you for not making
me feel my comments are unwanted:
>> . . . Do you think George Bush had an ulterior motive
when he appointed Roberts?
I do. The
history of Republican-appointed justices to the Supreme Court indicates an
ongoing pattern of deception.
>> . . . If they let the Democrats have their way with
only a little bluster before going along with them, I wonder why they bother to
put up the show at all.
It’s
simply to deceive the American public into believing that it has “a choice”. As
long as “conservative” Americans buy into the idea that the Republican party
represents THEIR views and values, they will continue to fight against
the Democrats by attempting to put Republicans in power.
The
Republican party continues to “compromise” America Leftward while engaging in
fake fights with Democrats, hoping that the voters will not realize that the
nation’s continuous slide to the Left is by design. If the “conservative”
voters catch on, they will stop voting “R” and the jig is up. Then a “REAL” conservative
political party will be formed to oppose both the Dems and the Reps.
The
purpose behind this whole deception is to ultimately surrender American
sovereignty to a single Global Government.
The dogs
may sound different when they “bark”, but the Democrat and the Republican
parties both have sharp teeth which they use to rip away the meat of the U.S.
Constitution. Not until the Constitution has become utterly meaningless (which
it nearly is now) can it be replaced with a One-World Government.
During
the 2008 presidential race, The New American magazine published a good article.
If you’re interested, here’s a link to it:
.
And below
is a brief excerpt from the article:
Republican presidents have appointed justices to the Supreme
Court who generally do not reflect the official positions of the Republican
Party, namely limited government, personal responsibility, lower taxes, respect
for life, etc. The Republican-appointed justices mentioned above are just the
beginning of a long list of such appointees who have rejected the basic
philosophy of the GOP. This writer’s review of the records of all Supreme Court
justices appointed by Republican presidents in the last 100 years shows that,
by a large margin, they have been liberals and statists, rather than
conservatives or conservative libertarians.
By 1992, at the beginning of the Clinton presidency, eight
of the nine Supreme Court justices were Republican appointees. Yet, the court
continued its destructive pattern of trampling on property rights,
disrespecting the right to life, expanding state power, disregarding family and
local autonomy, and (in general) imposing unconstitutional rulings. There was
little attempt to restrain the unconstitutional excesses of the president or
Congress.
In 2010,
I posted on my blog an installment pertaining to this false notion that we have
two political parties with widely differing opinions on how the U.S. ought to be governed. I quoted
from the 1966 book ‘Tragedy And Hope’ written by Carroll Quigley, a highly
influential “elite” professor (he was Bill Clinton’s mentor).
Here’s a
link, should you have the time and inclination to check it out at some point:
.
Here’s an
excerpt from the man’s book:
… the two parties should be almost identical, so that the
American people can “throw the rascals out” at any election without leading to
any profound or extensive shifts in policy. … either party in office becomes in
time corrupt, tired, unenterprising, and vigorless. Then it should be possible
to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be
none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the
same basic policies.
And that,
my friend, is EXACTLY what happens. If we use the Constitution as the
standard by which we measure just how “conservative” a political party or a
president is, then it becomes exceedingly clear that neither party is
conservative, and there has not been a single genuinely conservative president
in your lifetime or mine.
~ Stephen T. McCarthy
YE OLDE
COMMENT POLICY: All comments, pro and con, are welcome. However, ad hominem
attacks and disrespectful epithets will not be tolerated (read: "posted").
After all, this isn’t Amazon.com,
so I don’t have to put up with that kind of bovine excrement.
.
.jpeg)
