.
[From the STMcC archive: 2004, November.]
THE NEW WORLD ORDER
"THE NEW WORLD ORDER" is a code phrase that implies the gradual dissolution of America's Constitutional Republic in favor of global, totalitarian Socialism. The New Order is to be controlled by the secret cabal of (primarily) INTERNATIONAL BANKERS who are installing it with the help of self-professed Socialists.
Because of the unimaginable grandiosity of the scheme, the Conspirators trust that you will remain oblivious to their agenda despite the immense amount of evidence that points to it. In fact, they are so confident, so arrogant, that they openly acknowledge their nefarious plan to strip you of your Constitutionally-guarded liberties. As Gary Allen says in, 'None Dare Call It Conspiracy': "The INSIDERS are counting on your being too preoccupied with your own problems or too lazy to fight back while the chains of slavery are being fastened on you . . . The INSIDERS don't care how much you know about their conspiracy so long as you don't do anything about it."
He's also correct in his observation that "some people wake up and give up in the same week."
Most people dismiss the idea of CONSPIRACY out-of-hand because they have been conditioned to do so. And yet, history is nothing if not a patchwork quilt of conspiracies. And if men will conspire to gain control of commercial monopolies or nations, why would exceedingly powerful men - who view the rest of society as nothing more than loose dogs and lemmings - NOT conspire toward the ultimate gain?: global control. In fact, when once a person decides to OBJECTIVELY investigate the possibility of a GLOBAL CONSPIRACY, he or she inevitably comes away startled by the sudden obviousness of it!
Let's look at just a small sample of quotations that unveil this not-so-hidden Conspiracy. Simply follow the bouncing ball and connect the dots. And note how freely the Conspirators flaunt their anti-Constitutional (read: "anti-American") agenda; how brazenly they mock us loose dogs and lemmings!
[*NOTE: Although I have linked these book titles to Amazon.com product pages, it is my hope that you will make purchases from other online retail sites. I do not monetarily support Amazon.com.]
THE ILLUMINATI
"WE MUST DO OUR UTMOST TO PROCURE THE ADVANCEMENT OF ILLUMINATI INTO ALL IMPORTANT CIVIL OFFICES."
~ Adam Weishaupt (Founder of the Secret Society, 'The Order Of The Illuminati' in Bavaria, May 1, 1776.)
[Quoted in Proofs of a Conspiracy Against All the Religions and Governments of Europe Carried on in the Secret Meetings of Freemasons, Illuminati and Reading Societies by Robison and New World Order by Epperson.]
"IT IS NOT MY INTENTION TO DOUBT THAT THE DOCTRINE OF THE ILLUMINATI...HAD NOT SPREAD IN THE UNITED STATES. ON THE CONTRARY, NO ONE IS MORE SATISFIED OF THIS FACT THAN I AM."
~ President George Washington; 1798 (From the Writings Of George Washington, published by the U.S. Government Printing Office, 1941. Vol.20; page 518.)
[Quoted in Freedom on the Altar: The UN's Crusade Against God and Family by Grigg and THE NEW WORLD ORDER by Epperson.]
"I GAVE IT AS MY OPINION...THAT IF THESE (SECRET) SOCIETIES WERE NOT COUNTERACTED...THEY WOULD SHAKE THE GOVERNMENT TO ITS FOUNDATIONS."
~ President George Washington
[Quoted in Rule by Secrecy: The Hidden History That Connects the Trilateral Commission, the Freemasons, and the Great Pyramids by Marrs.]
THE ILLUMINATI/COMMUNIST CONNECTION
The Marxist revolutionary faith "GREW OUT OF OCCULT FREEMASONRY...AND BAVARIAN ILLUMINISM IN PARTICULAR."
~ James H. Billington (Librarian Of Congress; member of the Council On Foreign Relations) from his 1980 book, Fire in the Minds of Men
[Quoted in The New World Order by Robertson.]
"I THINK THE COMMUNIST CONSPIRACY IS MERELY A BRANCH OF A MUCH BIGGER CONSPIRACY."
~ Dr. Bella Dodd (Former member of the National Committee of the U.S. Communist Party.)
[Quoted in The Naked Capitalist by Skousen.]
TREASON IN THE WHITE HOUSE
We have "A DEFECTIVE GOVERNMENT, DEFECTIVE IN MACHINERY, AND DEFECTIVE IN ITS CONSTITUTION AND LAWS...OUR CONSTITUTION AND OUR LAWS SERVED US WELL FOR THE FIRST HUNDERED YEARS OF OUR EXISTENCE, BUT UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF TODAY THEY ARE NOT ONLY OBSOLETE, BUT EVEN GROTESQUE."
~ Edward Mandell House (Founding member of the Council On Foreign Relations and the United Nations; primary advisor to President Woodrow Wilson; advisor to President Franklin Roosevelt) projecting his viewpoint through the voice of his character, Philip Dru, in his 1912 book, Philip Dru: Administrator )
"FOR A LONG TIME IT HAD SEEMED TO ME THAT OUR GOVERNMENT WAS TOO COMPLICATED IN ITS MACHINERY AND THAT WE HAD OUTGROWN OUR CONSTITUTION."
~ Edward Mandell House from a July 10, 1922 letter explaining the purpose for his novel, Philip Dru: Administrator
"MR. (EDWARD MANDELL) HOUSE IS MY SECOND PERSONALITY. HE IS MY INDEPENDENT SELF. HIS THOUGHTS AND MINE ARE ONE...IF ANYONE THINKS HE IS REFLECTING MY OPINION BY WHATEVER ACTION HE TAKES, THEY ARE WELCOME TO THE CONCLUSION."
~ President Woodrow Wilson
[Quoted in the appendix of Philip Dru: Administrator ]
"PRESIDENT WOODROW WILSON WAS THE FAIRY GODMOTHER WHO PROVIDED TROTSKY WITH A PASSPORT TO RETURN TO RUSSIA TO CARRY FORWARD THE REVOLUTION."
~ Antony Sutton from his book, Wall Street & the Bolshevik Revolution
[Quoted in The Creature from Jekyll Island : A Second Look at the Federal Reserve by Griffin.]
"THE COMMUNIST WORLD REVOLUTION HAS BEEN LARGELY FINANCED FROM ITS START IN 1903 UNTIL THE PRESENT DAY BY AMERICAN WEALTH, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE...EVERY COMMUNIST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD LITERALLY HAS A 'MADE IN THE U.S.A.' STAMP."
~ John Stormer in None Dare Call It Treason - 25 Years Later
"THE REAL TRUTH OF THE MATTER IS, AS YOU AND I KNOW, THAT A FINANCIAL ELEMENT IN THE LARGE CENTERS HAS OWNED THE GOVERNMENT EVER SINCE THE DAYS OF ANDREW JACKSON."
~ President Franklin Roosevelt from a November 23, 1933 letter to Edward Mandell House.
[Quoted in The Unseen Hand by Epperson and The Shadows of Power: The Council on Foreign Relations and the American Decline by Perloff.]
"WITHOUT EXCEPTION, WE OPERATED UNDER DIRECTIVES ISSUED BY THE WHITE HOUSE. WE ARE CONTINUING TO BE GUIDED BY JUST SUCH DIRECTIVES, THE SUBSTANCE OF WHICH WAS TO THE EFFECT THAT WE SHOULD MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO SO ALTER LIFE IN THE UNITED STATES AS TO MAKE POSSIBLE A COMFORTABLE MERGER WITH THE SOVIET UNION."
~ H. Rowan Gaither (President of the Ford Foundation) to Norman Dodd (Director of The Reece Committee, investigating Foundations) in 1953.
[Quoted in You Don't Say by Gielow.]
THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS
"THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS (C.F.R.) IS THE AMERICAN BRANCH OF A SOCIETY WHICH ORIGINATED IN ENGLAND AND BELIEVES NATIONAL BOUNDARIES SHOULD BE OBLITERATED AND ONE-WORLD RULE ESTABLISHED."
~ Professor Carroll Quigley
The Organization's aim is "NOTHING LESS THAN TO CREATE A WORLD SYSTEM OF FINANCIAL CONTROL IN PRIVATE HANDS ABLE TO DOMINATE THE POLITICAL SYSTEM OF EACH COUNTRY AND THE ECONOMY OF THE WORLD AS A WHOLE.....I KNOW OF THE OPERATIONS OF THIS NETWORK BECAUSE I HAVE STUDIED IT FOR TWENTY YEARS AND WAS PERMITTED FOR TWO YEARS, IN THE EARLY 1960s, TO EXAMINE ITS PAPERS AND SECRET RECORDS."
~ Carroll Quigley (Georgetown University Professor and mentor to Bill Clinton) from his book, Tragedy & Hope: A History of the World in Our Time
[Quoted in The Creature from Jekyll Island : A Second Look at the Federal Reserve by Griffin; One World by Brooke; and NONE DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY by Allen.]
"A SECOND CLIQUE OF INTERNATIONAL MEMBERS IN THE 'COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS' COMPRISES THE WALL STREET INTERNATIONAL BANKERS AND THEIR KEY AGENTS."
~ Rear Admiral Chester Ward (former 16-year-member of The Council On Foreign Relations.)
[Quoted in THE UNSEEN HAND by Epperson.]
The Council On Foreign Relations has as a goal "SUBMERGENCE OF U.S. SOVEREIGNTY AND NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE INTO AN ALL-POWERFUL ONE-WORLD GOVERNMENT."
~ Rear Admiral Chester Ward from Kissinger on the Couch by Ward and Schlafly.
[Quoted in THE SHADOWS OF POWER by Perloff.]
"THE ULTIMATE AIM OF THE 'COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS' IS TO CREATE A ONE-WORLD SOCIALIST SYSTEM AND MAKE THE UNITED STATES AN OFFICIAL PART OF IT."
~ Dan Smoot (Member of F.B.I. Headquarters Staff in Washington D.C.)
[Quoted in The Unseen Hand by Epperson.]
"THE HOUSE OF WORLD ORDER WILL HAVE TO BE BUILT FROM THE BOTTOM UP RATHER THAN FROM THE TOP DOWN...AN END RUN AROUND NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY, ERODING IT PIECE BY PIECE, WILL ACCOMPLISH MORE THAN THE OLD-FASHIONED FRONTAL ASSAULT."
~ Richard Gardner (a top advisor to President Jimmy Carter; Ambassador to Italy) writing in the April 1974 issue of Foreign Affairs magazine, the official journal of the Council On Foreign Relations.
[Quoted in The Creature from Jekyll Island : A Second Look at the Federal Reserve by Griffin; The Shadows of Power: The Council on Foreign Relations and the American Decline by Perloff; The New World Order by Robertson; and THE UNSEEN HAND by Epperson.]
"NATIONHOOD AS WE KNOW IT WILL BE OBSOLETE, ALL STATES WILL RECOGNIZE A SINGLE, GLOBAL AUTHORITY...NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY WASN'T SUCH A GREAT IDEA AFTER ALL."
~ Strobe Talbott (U.S. Deputy Secretary Of State; Council On Foreign Relations member) writing in Time magazine, July 20, 1992.
[Quoted in You Don't Say by Gielow and The United Nations Exposed by Jasper.]
"WE SHALL HAVE WORLD GOVERNMENT WHETHER OR NOT YOU LIKE IT. THE ONLY QUESTION IS WHETHER WORLD GOVERNMENT WILL BE ACHIEVED BY CONQUEST OR CONSENT."
~ James Paul Warburg (Council On Foreign Relations member; foreign agent for the Rothschild dynasty) speaking before the U.S. Senate on Feb. 17, 1950.
[Quoted in YOU DON'T SAY by Gielow; THE UNSEEN HAND by Epperson; THE SHADOWS OF POWER by Perloff; and THE UNITED NATIONS EXPOSED by Jasper.]
NON-REPRESENTATIONAL, INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT (INTERNATIONAL BANKERS)
"DOES IT NOT SEEM STRANGE TO YOU THAT THESE MEN JUST HAPPENED TO BE C.F.R. AND JUST HAPPENED TO BE ON THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE 'FEDERAL RESERVE', THAT ABSOLUTELY CONTROLS THE MONEY AND INTEREST RATES OF THIS GREAT COUNTRY WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF CONGRESS? A PRIVATELY OWNED ORGANIZATION, THE FEDERAL RESERVE WHICH HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!"
~ Senator Barry Goldwater from his book, With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater
"THE REAL MENACE OF OUR REPUBLIC IS THIS INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT WHICH LIKE A GIANT OCTOPUS, SPRAWLS ITS SLIMY LENGTH OVER CITY, STATE AND NATION....AT THE HEAD OF THIS OCTOPUS ARE THE ROCKEFELLER-STANDARD OIL INTERESTS AND A SMALL GROUP OF POWERFUL BANKING HOUSES GENERALLY REFERRED TO AS THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS (WHO) VIRTUALLY RUN THE U.S. GOVERNMENT FOR THEIR OWN SELFISH PURPOSES."
~ New York City Mayor, John Hylan; March 26, 1922
[Quoted in THE SHADOWS OF POWER by Perloff.]
"OUTWARDLY WE HAVE A CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT. WE HAVE OPERATING WITHIN OUR GOVERNMENT AND POLITICAL SYSTEM, ANOTHER BODY REPRESENTING ANOTHER FORM OF GOVERNMENT, A BUREAUCRATIC ELITE WHICH BELIEVES OUR CONSTITUTION IS OUTMODED."
~ Senator William Jenner; Feb. 23, 1954.
[Quoted in None Dare Call It Treason: 25 Years Later by Stormer and THE SHADOWS OF POWER by Perloff.]
"IT (THE DEPRESSION) WAS NOT ACCIDENTAL. IT WAS A CAREFULLY CONTRIVED OCCURRENCE...THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS SOUGHT TO BRING ABOUT A CONDITION OF DESPAIR HERE SO THAT THEY MIGHT EMERGE AS THE RULERS OF US ALL."
~ Congressman Louis McFadden (Chairman of the House Banking And Currency Committee)
[Quoted in None Dare Call It Conspiracy by Allen.]
"IN THE UNITED STATES TODAY WE HAVE IN EFFECT TWO GOVERNMENTS...WE HAVE THE DULY CONSTITUTED GOVERNMENT...THEN WE HAVE AN INDEPENDENT, UNCONTROLLED AND UNCOORDINATED GOVERNMENT IN THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, OPERATING THE MONEY POWERS WHICH ARE RESERVED TO CONGRESS BY THE CONSTITUTION."
~ Congressman Wright Patman (Chairman of the House Banking Committee.)
[Quoted in NONE DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY by Allen.]
"THE REAL RULERS IN WASHINGTON ARE INVISIBLE, AND EXERCISE POWER FROM BEHIND THE SCENES."
~ Supreme Court Justice, Felix Frankfurter
[Quoted in THE SHADOWS OF POWER by Perloff.]
HELLO GLOBAL GOVERNMENT, GOODBYE U.S. CONSTITUTION
“NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY IS NO LONGER A VIABLE CONCEPT.” We ought to be aiming for “THE GOAL OF WORLD GOVERNMENT.”
~ Zbigniew Brzezinski (Council On Foreign Relations member) from his own book BETWEEN TWO AGES published in 1970.
[*Zbigniew Brzezinski was President Jimmy Carter’s national security advisor. He was also a campaign manager for Senator John McCain’s 2000 presidential bid, and he now serves as one of the principal foreign policy advisors to Barack “Hope And Change” Obama.]
“WE DO NOT HAVE A NEW WORLD ORDER.” … “WE CANNOT LEAP INTO WORLD GOVERNMENT IN ONE QUICK STEP.” … Globalization will need to be built “STEP BY STEP, STONE BY STONE” ... “IN BRIEF, THE PRECONDITION FOR EVENTUAL GLOBALIZATION - GENUINE GLOBALIZATION - IS PROGRESSIVE REGIONALIZATION.”
~ Zbigniew Brzezinski (Council On Foreign Relations member) speaking at Mikhail Gorbachev’s 1995 State Of The World Forum in San Francisco.
"IT IS THE SACRED PRINCIPLES ENSHRINED IN THE U. N. (UNITED NATIONS) CHARTER TO WHICH WE WILL HENCEFORTH PLEDGE OUR ALLEGIANCE."
~ President George Bush, Sr. speaking at the U.N. Building, Feb. 1, 1992. (*Remember when we pledged our allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands?)
[Quoted in You Don't Say by Gielow.]
"NEW WORLD ORDER MEANS THE U.S. AND OTHER NATIONS AGREE TO BE GOVERNED BY A RULE OF LAW....APPLYING THIS ON A WORLD SCALE MEANS...GLOBAL LAW, BREACHES OF WHICH WILL BE PUNISHED SWIFTLY AND WITH CERTAINTY."
~ Caspar Weinberger (former U.S. Secretary Of Defense), writing in Forbes magazine, Feb. 15, 1993.
[Quoted in One World by Brooke.]
"TODAY, I SAY THAT NO NATION IN THE WORLD NEED BE LEFT OUT OF THE GLOBAL SYSTEM WE ARE CONSTRUCTING."
~ Madeleine Albright, U.S. Secretary Of State, speaking at the Harvard University commencement, 1997.
[Quoted in ONE WORLD by Brooke.]
“FOR MORE THAN A CENTURY, IDEOLOGICAL EXTREMISTS AT EITHER END OF THE POLITICAL SPECTRUM HAVE SEIZED UPON WELL-PUBLICIZED INCIDENTS, SUCH AS MY ENCOUNTER WITH CASTRO, TO ATTACK THE ROCKEFELLER FAMILY FOR THE INORDINATE INFLUENCE THEY CLAIM WE WIELD OVER AMERICAN POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC INSTITUTIONS. SOME EVEN BELIEVE WE ARE PART OF A SECRET CABAL WORKING AGAINST THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE UNITED STATES, CHARACTERIZING MY FAMILY AND ME AS ‘INTERNATIONALISTS’ AND OF CONSPIRING WITH OTHERS AROUND THE WORLD TO BUILD A MORE INTEGRATED GLOBAL POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC STRUCTURE – ONE WORLD, IF YOU WILL. IF THAT’S THE CHARGE, I STAND GUILTY, AND I AM PROUD OF IT.”
~ David Rockefeller (Council On Foreign Relations member) in his own book MEMOIRS published in 2002.
"AND POWER WAS GIVEN TO (THE BEAST) OVER EVERY TRIBE AND KINDRED AND TONGUE AND NATION....AND HE COMPELLED ALL...TO RECEIVE A MARK ON THEIR RIGHT HANDS OR ON THEIR BROWS, SO THAT NO MAN MIGHT BUY OR SELL UNLESS HE HAD THE MARK OF THE BEAST OR THE CODE NUMBER OF HIS NAME."
~ Saint John from REVELATION 13 in Holy Bible: From the Ancient Eastern Text: George M. Lamsa's Translation From the Aramaic of the Peshitta translated by George Lamsa.
[*2005, Jan. 17th ADDENDUM: In the USA TODAY Sunday newspaper supplement, USA WEEKEND, for 2005, Jan. 14-16, the following item appeared on page 8, under the headline, 'MULDER KNEW THIS WAS COMING':
"VeriChip sounds like something from The X-Files. This computer chip the size of a grain of rice is implanted under the skin; when scanned, it provides access to that person's medical records, helping EMT and ER personnel. Approved by the FDA, it will be used this year at a handful of trauma centers."
In our increasingly cashless society, it takes very little imagination to conceive of this technology being expanded in the future, and being employed in the form of a secure, global banking system. The chip, corresponding to a person's description and DNA could be adapted to calculate personal credits and debits, and sold to the public because of its convenience, and as a monetary safeguard. Naturally, without the implanted chip, a person could not "buy or sell" in any nation. This technology, unimaginable in SAINT JOHN's time, is not only possible in ours, but already has our government's FDA approval! Think about it!]
It is NOT that the U.S. CONSTITUTION failed, and has ruined us; it is that failing to follow the U.S. CONSTITUTION, we are ruined! And just like a book, 'The New World Order In Black & White'... is "RED" all over!
The Creature from Jekyll Island : A Second Look at the Federal Reserve by G. Edward Griffin.....
Until a person has a working knowledge of 'THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM' and 'THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS', he or she has no real understanding of the contemporary American political landscape. This book will teach you about BOTH. If you're going to peruse only ONE book on this list - other than The Holy Bible - this should be the ONE!
However, if “Creature” makes you mad enough to read a second political book, I recommend you make it “NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON: 25 YEARS LATER” by John Stormer. I have found no political works better than these two publications.
A Politically-Awake Loose Dog,
~Stephen T. McCarthy
Link:
Professor Carroll Quigley On The Fraudulent Nature Of Political Parties
.
Sunday, March 22, 2009
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
BARACK OBAMA, U SAP!
.
.
http://mine.icanhascheezburger.com/view.aspx?ciid=3640016
"BARACK OBAMA: U.S.A.P."
by ProvDog (that would be me - STMcC)
3/11/2009
"UNDOCUMENTED" = Obama still refuses to allow the American People to see his official birth certificate. Whaddaya s'pose he's hiding?
"SOCIALIST" = Well, if I gotta 'splain this to you, then you're already a lost cause. Go back to sleep in front of yer Boob Tube.
"ACTING as PRESIDENT" = Until Obama proves that he is legally qualified to hold the office, by showing us his official birth certificate (thus satisfying the legal requirement found in Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution), he cannot be considered the true president of the United States of America. He is merely "acting as" the president.
U SAP = "sap; 5. Slang. a fool; dupe." [from Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary] Anyone who believes that global Socialism will turn out to be a good thing for the people of the world is a fool who has been duped by pseudo-intellectuals. Our pseudo-president, Barack Obama, is a sap.
~ Stephen T. McCarthy
Postscript: For me, the bottom line is this: until Barack Obama is required to show a body of experts his official birth certificate which includes the name of the hospital in Hawaii where he was supposedly born, along with the name and signature of the physician who delivered him - just as I would be required to provide if I were applying for a sensitive position with a federal intelligence agency - I will continue to consider Obama "Undocumented."
Background Information:
What, Is He From The Womb Of The Mother Ship Sent By Planet Malcolm-X?
Born To Be Filed
On Deceit And Dissent
Obama's 'Birth Certificate' Not Acceptable In Hawaii?
Why Obama Wants To Hide Birth Certificate
Pentagon Orders Soldier Fired For Challenging Prez
Meet Tim Adams
Tim Adams, USAP, And The 'Globe' Story
More "USAP" Birth Certificate Bullshit!
Barack "USAP" Obama: Lying Like A Bad Toupee!
‘WTF?! Weirder By The Week’ (Or, ‘The USAP Code – Find The Hidden Messages In BO’s BC’)
Friggin’ Fact: Barack “USAP” Obama’s Birth Certificate Absolutely Proven-2-B-A-Forgery!
Sign Of The Times And Scene Of The Crimes
A Birth Certificate Poll For Black Americans: Please Vote Only Once
Sorry, Friends, But It's Not Clearing Up...
Where's The Social Security Card, Barack "USAP" Obama?
Green Baloney And Pink Underwear For Barack "USAP" Obama?
Who Is Harrison J. Bounel?
B.O.'s B.C. B.S. (Or, Arizona Shows The Way . . . Again)
Celebrity Boxing: Sheriff Joe Arpaio Knocks Out Barack “USAP” Obama In The Second Round!
Obama's Social-ist Suck-urity Swindle (Or, Best Evidence Of Democrat / Republican Conspiracy?)
Little White Mama’s Big Black Hand?
Marxist Muslim Obama Married To Allah, Islam’s Pseudo-God Demon?
.
.
http://mine.icanhascheezburger.com/view.aspx?ciid=3640016
"BARACK OBAMA: U.S.A.P."
by ProvDog (that would be me - STMcC)
3/11/2009
"UNDOCUMENTED" = Obama still refuses to allow the American People to see his official birth certificate. Whaddaya s'pose he's hiding?
"SOCIALIST" = Well, if I gotta 'splain this to you, then you're already a lost cause. Go back to sleep in front of yer Boob Tube.
"ACTING as PRESIDENT" = Until Obama proves that he is legally qualified to hold the office, by showing us his official birth certificate (thus satisfying the legal requirement found in Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution), he cannot be considered the true president of the United States of America. He is merely "acting as" the president.
U SAP = "sap; 5. Slang. a fool; dupe." [from Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary] Anyone who believes that global Socialism will turn out to be a good thing for the people of the world is a fool who has been duped by pseudo-intellectuals. Our pseudo-president, Barack Obama, is a sap.
~ Stephen T. McCarthy
Postscript: For me, the bottom line is this: until Barack Obama is required to show a body of experts his official birth certificate which includes the name of the hospital in Hawaii where he was supposedly born, along with the name and signature of the physician who delivered him - just as I would be required to provide if I were applying for a sensitive position with a federal intelligence agency - I will continue to consider Obama "Undocumented."
Background Information:
What, Is He From The Womb Of The Mother Ship Sent By Planet Malcolm-X?
Born To Be Filed
On Deceit And Dissent
Obama's 'Birth Certificate' Not Acceptable In Hawaii?
Why Obama Wants To Hide Birth Certificate
Pentagon Orders Soldier Fired For Challenging Prez
Meet Tim Adams
Tim Adams, USAP, And The 'Globe' Story
More "USAP" Birth Certificate Bullshit!
Barack "USAP" Obama: Lying Like A Bad Toupee!
‘WTF?! Weirder By The Week’ (Or, ‘The USAP Code – Find The Hidden Messages In BO’s BC’)
Friggin’ Fact: Barack “USAP” Obama’s Birth Certificate Absolutely Proven-2-B-A-Forgery!
Sign Of The Times And Scene Of The Crimes
A Birth Certificate Poll For Black Americans: Please Vote Only Once
Sorry, Friends, But It's Not Clearing Up...
Where's The Social Security Card, Barack "USAP" Obama?
Green Baloney And Pink Underwear For Barack "USAP" Obama?
Who Is Harrison J. Bounel?
B.O.'s B.C. B.S. (Or, Arizona Shows The Way . . . Again)
Celebrity Boxing: Sheriff Joe Arpaio Knocks Out Barack “USAP” Obama In The Second Round!
Obama's Social-ist Suck-urity Swindle (Or, Best Evidence Of Democrat / Republican Conspiracy?)
Little White Mama’s Big Black Hand?
Marxist Muslim Obama Married To Allah, Islam’s Pseudo-God Demon?
.
Sunday, March 8, 2009
MARX VS. KEYNES: COMPARATIVE SOCIALISM IN MINIATURE
SOCIALISTS: DIRTY DOGS ALL!
The word “Marxist” is one I use frequently to describe… well, nearly everyone at the upper levels of American government today. Whether I’m talking about our undocumented, illegal alien president, Barack Obama (where’s that birth certificate, Sonny Boy?), our senators and congressmen, our judicial activists, or our media brainwashers, I’m frequently inclined to attach the “Marxist” appellation to these scoundrels. While in the strictest sense, the word may not always be entirely accurate, I employ it not out of ignorance but for effect:
On November 5th, 2008, the day after Omama! was elected by the foolish People in this country to the presidency, I posted a Blog Bit here titled “MARXIST PNEUMONIA AND THE POST-ELECTION FLU.” In that Bit, I wrote the following:
From this day forward, you can expect me to stop using the “Charmin” word [Socialism] and begin using – exclusively – the “toilet paper” term [Marxism].”
You see, I had come to realize that the American People have been so dumbed down that they no longer fully understand the meaning of “Socialism.” They do not always realize that the very concept is completely antithetical to the principles this nation was founded upon – those principles which once upon a time made America the greatest country in the world. But since the term “Socialism” no longer holds any meaning for most Americonned citizens, yet “Marxism” still seems to retain a little of that nasty taste in the mouth, I have decided to call all of our Socialist masters “Marxists.”
However, for the sake of clarity, I’m going to take a moment here to briefly explain what sort of Socialism currently drives this country. First take note: While all Marxists are socialists, not all socialists are Marxists. As far as Socialism in general goes, I think Rene Wormser probably said it best in his very important 1958 book FOUNDATIONS: THEIR POWER AND INFLUENCE:
“[I]t is difficult to mark the line beyond which socialism becomes communism. The line may be between methods of assuming power, communism being distinguished from other forms of socialism by its intent upon establishing a dictatorship of the proletariat. But this line is by no means clear. Socialism has the same ends as communism, though with an allegedly democratic approach. The Communist Manifesto of 1848 is the basis of all socialist parties the world over. Marx himself did not distinguish between socialism and communism...”
Now, for the remainder of this brief examination, I am going to quote from one of the two greatest political books I’ve ever read, and yes, I’ve read a ton of political books. (You read sixteen tons and what do you get? A load of frustration and deeper in debt!) The following comes from the masterpiece NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON: 25 YEARS LATER by Mr. John Stormer. This is the 1990 updated version of his original 1964 political classic. Let’s look into Chapter XII; ‘Economics And Government’:
Government contol has been the ultimate goal of the collectivist thinkers who have been infiltrating every segment of American life for 60 years. In government, as in every other field, the collectivists have first infiltrated quietly, and then grabbed for control. …
WHAT IS KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS?
As collectivists have grabbed for control of the federal government they have skillfully used the “economic” theories of John Maynard Keynes, a British Fabian economist, as the vehicle for buying the votes and support of the masses with their own money.
Today’s advocates of Keynes and his theories present him respectably as the “last hope for saving free enterprises” in the typical Fabian fashion of “never calling socialism by its true label.” However, no less an authority than Norman Thomas, six-time Socialist candidate for President of the United States, writing in ‘A Socialist’s Faith’, said:
“…Keynes has had a great influence and his work is especially important in any re-appraisal of socialist theory. He represents a decisive break with laissez-faire capitalism.”
The Keynes brand of socialism differs from the Marxist variety in that it advocates strict control of the means of production and the supply of credit and money rather than government ownership. On the theory that when control is possible, ownership is not required, the Keynesian theories are particularly suited to the Fabian goal of “change everything except the outward appearance.” The national socialist movements headed by Hitler and Mussolini recognized the beauties of control rather than ownership and adopted Keynes theories in Germany and Italy.
John Strachey, a one-time Communist who entered the British Fabian Society in 1943 and became War Minister in the Labor Government of Great Britain in 1950, explains Keynes theories this way:
“The positive part of Keynes’ work was a demand that capitalism should now be regulated and controlled by a central authority. … The principal instruments of its policy should be variations in the rate of interest, budgetary deficits and surpluses, public works and a redistribution of personal incomes in equalitarian direction. This positive side of Keynes’ work requires an authority to do the regulating, and that authority can be, in contemporary conditions, nothing else but the government of a nation state.”
Strachey hints to his socialist followers the ultimate possibilities in Keynes’ theories. He says:
“Was it not apparent that Keynesism had only to be pushed a little further and a state of things might emerge in which the nominal owners of the means of production, although left in full possession of the legal title to their property, would in reality be working not for themselves, but for whatever hands grasped the central levers of social control? … Might not the end of the story be that once proud possessors of the means of production would find themselves in effect but agents and managers on behalf of the community?”
Strachey cold-bloodedly admits the falsity of the “saving capitalism” mantle wrapped around Keynesian theories:
“…the capitalists have really good reasons for their reluctance to be saved by Keynesian policies.”
Taking into consideration recent movements toward nationalizing the banking industry, the medical industry, and the housing market, along with every other aspect of American life, it’s perfectly clear that the Keynesian system of socialization is being followed to the letter K. Comrades, let’s look at more from the same chapter of Stormer’s masterpiece:
Dr. William Wirt, the superintendent of schools from Gary, Indiana, was invited to dinner at the home of a government employee while in Washington to attend a school administrators meeting in September 1933. After dinner, the hostess, Alice Barrows, an employeee of the Department of Education, and other guests disclosed that Communists had infiltrated and taken control of the New Deal. Four of the dinner guests were government employees. The fifth was the Washington representative of Tass, the Soviet news agency. Wirt summarized what was said at the meeting… :
“Brain Trusters insist that the America of Washington, Jefferson, and Lincoln must first be destroyed so that on the ruins they will be able to construct an America after their own pattern. … They wish to put the common man back into the feudal society of the Dark Ages. … I was told they believe that by thwarting our then evident economic recovery they would be able to prolong the country’s destitution until they had demonstrated to the American people that the Government must operate business and commerce. By propaganda they would destroy institutions making long-time capital loans – and then push Uncle Sam into making these loans. Once Uncle Sam becomes our financier he must also follow his money with control and management.”
Hmmm… Amerika 2009, anyone? If I, with my limited knowledge of economic theories, am able to clearly discern through basic logic that the monetary path our current puppet masters have chosen to follow will lead us to a complete debasing of and thus ultimately the ruination of the American dollar, then you can be sure that those socialists in Washington D.C. know it, too. And unless you, Blog Reader, can see this just as plainly, then you must openly confess to being less intelligent than I am. (And that would be a pretty sad admission, because – Lord, help me! – I’m just not that bright.) Let’s get back to the book, my fellow Amerikeynes. On page 272, Mr. Stormer describes the “spend your way to prosperity” concept as “Keynesian.” (Whose theories is our illegal alien in the White House following? Anyone? You there, Billy! Put down that cell phone and answer the question!) And then Mr. Stormer goes on to write:
Not many Americans are comfortable with the ideas of the political arm of the Fabian Society. But as president, John Kennedy appointed 40 members of this political under-world to high government posts.
For example, Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., a Harvard professor and ADA-founder, is Kennedy’s special assistant. In 1947, Schlesinger wrote:
“If socialism … is to preserve democracy it must be brought about step by step in a way which will not disrupt the fabric of custom, law and mutual confidence upon which personal rights depend. That is, the transition must be piecemeal… There seems no inherent obstacle to the gradual advance of socialism in the United States through a series of New Deals. Socialism, then, appears quite practical within this frame of reference, as a long-time proposition. It’s gradual advance might well preserve order and law. … The active agents in effecting the transition will probably be, not the working classes, but some combination of lawyers, business and labor managers, politicians and intellectuals, in the manner of the first New Deal.”
In these three short paragraphs, Schlesinger confirms vividly what good Americans are called right-wing extremists for saying: That the Fabians (gradualists) are socialists; that Keynesian economic policy is the path to socialism; that goals of communism and socialism are essentially the same; that New Deal welfare state proposals whether enacted by Democrats or Republicans are socialistic; that establishment of socialism will result in a curtailment of freedom; that socialism and communism appeal, not to the working class or the poverty stricken masses, but to the “liberal” intellectual, the college professor, and the turncoat businessman.
So there you have it, a short and simple explanation of the basic differences between Marxist and Keynesian economic theories. It’s clear that since Marxism, because of its bloody history, could probably never be forced upon the Americonned People, a different method had to be employed. Through the decades, and regardless of whether they referred to themselves as Conservatives or Progressives (liberals), Republicans or Democrats, Capitalists or Communists, our traitors in high places have surreptitiously followed the path of Keynesian socialism, steering this country there through legislation and judicial rulings. So, now ya know! The names may change, the labels may change, the party in power may change, but the slow march to a socialistic global government remains the same. Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama: Keynesians all!
And the Endgame is this: wreck the American economy and replace the dollar with the “Amero," a new form of money for the planned North American Union (Canada, the U.S., and Mexico). This will move us one step closer to the goal of a world government with a single global monetary system and the end of national sovereignty – a “New World Order.”
As Newsweek magazine boldly proclaimed on its cover recently: “WE ARE ALL SOCIALISTS NOW.” Indeed. But this did not happen by accident nor because free enterprise Capitalism doesn’t work. It happened because unpatriotic Elitists sold us out in an attempt to consolidate power for themselves. And it happened because you, Mr. and Mrs. and Miss and Ms. Amerikeyne, didn’t turn off your TV and wake up to what was happening and vote for strict Constitutionalists (like Ron Paul) to government office. YOU voted for Socialism instead of The American Way. Good goin’! In this country, ya gets what ya votes for!
In closing, I want to say a few more words about the book I quoted from here:
A lawyer where I work is now leaving the company, and knowing she would soon have considerably more downtime, asked if I would compile a list of recommended books for her to explore. I tailored the list specifically for her, based upon my slight knowledge of her interests, but a few titles which I included, I would have placed on a recommended book list for ANYONE. And one of those publications was NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON: 25 YEARS LATER by John Stormer. Here is how I described the book on her list:
The original 1964 classic on Communism and Liberalism updated [in 1990]. Every bit as relevant today as it was in ’64. It’s comprehensive, thoroughly researched and referenced. Its importance is impossible to overstate… Along with THE CREATURE FROM JEKYLL ISLAND: A SECOND LOOK AT THE FEDERAL RESERVE, it is A MUST-READ! (Be sure you get the updated version with the “25 Years Later” subtitle added.)
But to put it even more forcefully, I will say that, in my opinion, no one’s political education is near complete until he or she has read NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON: 25 YEARS LATER. There is only one political book as good and none better. (Bear in mind when reading it that the first 14 of its 27 chapters were penned in ’64, so a few details in those chapters are no longer in effect. For instance, the Gold Standard has since been utterly abandoned… for obvious, underhanded reasons. So read the original portion of the book with modern changes in mind.)
That’s all, folks!
Goodbye for now, Blog Reader.
Adios forever, America! (You voted yourself to death.)
~ Stephen T. McCarthy
.
The word “Marxist” is one I use frequently to describe… well, nearly everyone at the upper levels of American government today. Whether I’m talking about our undocumented, illegal alien president, Barack Obama (where’s that birth certificate, Sonny Boy?), our senators and congressmen, our judicial activists, or our media brainwashers, I’m frequently inclined to attach the “Marxist” appellation to these scoundrels. While in the strictest sense, the word may not always be entirely accurate, I employ it not out of ignorance but for effect:
On November 5th, 2008, the day after Omama! was elected by the foolish People in this country to the presidency, I posted a Blog Bit here titled “MARXIST PNEUMONIA AND THE POST-ELECTION FLU.” In that Bit, I wrote the following:
From this day forward, you can expect me to stop using the “Charmin” word [Socialism] and begin using – exclusively – the “toilet paper” term [Marxism].”
You see, I had come to realize that the American People have been so dumbed down that they no longer fully understand the meaning of “Socialism.” They do not always realize that the very concept is completely antithetical to the principles this nation was founded upon – those principles which once upon a time made America the greatest country in the world. But since the term “Socialism” no longer holds any meaning for most Americonned citizens, yet “Marxism” still seems to retain a little of that nasty taste in the mouth, I have decided to call all of our Socialist masters “Marxists.”
However, for the sake of clarity, I’m going to take a moment here to briefly explain what sort of Socialism currently drives this country. First take note: While all Marxists are socialists, not all socialists are Marxists. As far as Socialism in general goes, I think Rene Wormser probably said it best in his very important 1958 book FOUNDATIONS: THEIR POWER AND INFLUENCE:
“[I]t is difficult to mark the line beyond which socialism becomes communism. The line may be between methods of assuming power, communism being distinguished from other forms of socialism by its intent upon establishing a dictatorship of the proletariat. But this line is by no means clear. Socialism has the same ends as communism, though with an allegedly democratic approach. The Communist Manifesto of 1848 is the basis of all socialist parties the world over. Marx himself did not distinguish between socialism and communism...”
Now, for the remainder of this brief examination, I am going to quote from one of the two greatest political books I’ve ever read, and yes, I’ve read a ton of political books. (You read sixteen tons and what do you get? A load of frustration and deeper in debt!) The following comes from the masterpiece NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON: 25 YEARS LATER by Mr. John Stormer. This is the 1990 updated version of his original 1964 political classic. Let’s look into Chapter XII; ‘Economics And Government’:
Government contol has been the ultimate goal of the collectivist thinkers who have been infiltrating every segment of American life for 60 years. In government, as in every other field, the collectivists have first infiltrated quietly, and then grabbed for control. …
WHAT IS KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS?
As collectivists have grabbed for control of the federal government they have skillfully used the “economic” theories of John Maynard Keynes, a British Fabian economist, as the vehicle for buying the votes and support of the masses with their own money.
Today’s advocates of Keynes and his theories present him respectably as the “last hope for saving free enterprises” in the typical Fabian fashion of “never calling socialism by its true label.” However, no less an authority than Norman Thomas, six-time Socialist candidate for President of the United States, writing in ‘A Socialist’s Faith’, said:
“…Keynes has had a great influence and his work is especially important in any re-appraisal of socialist theory. He represents a decisive break with laissez-faire capitalism.”
The Keynes brand of socialism differs from the Marxist variety in that it advocates strict control of the means of production and the supply of credit and money rather than government ownership. On the theory that when control is possible, ownership is not required, the Keynesian theories are particularly suited to the Fabian goal of “change everything except the outward appearance.” The national socialist movements headed by Hitler and Mussolini recognized the beauties of control rather than ownership and adopted Keynes theories in Germany and Italy.
John Strachey, a one-time Communist who entered the British Fabian Society in 1943 and became War Minister in the Labor Government of Great Britain in 1950, explains Keynes theories this way:
“The positive part of Keynes’ work was a demand that capitalism should now be regulated and controlled by a central authority. … The principal instruments of its policy should be variations in the rate of interest, budgetary deficits and surpluses, public works and a redistribution of personal incomes in equalitarian direction. This positive side of Keynes’ work requires an authority to do the regulating, and that authority can be, in contemporary conditions, nothing else but the government of a nation state.”
Strachey hints to his socialist followers the ultimate possibilities in Keynes’ theories. He says:
“Was it not apparent that Keynesism had only to be pushed a little further and a state of things might emerge in which the nominal owners of the means of production, although left in full possession of the legal title to their property, would in reality be working not for themselves, but for whatever hands grasped the central levers of social control? … Might not the end of the story be that once proud possessors of the means of production would find themselves in effect but agents and managers on behalf of the community?”
Strachey cold-bloodedly admits the falsity of the “saving capitalism” mantle wrapped around Keynesian theories:
“…the capitalists have really good reasons for their reluctance to be saved by Keynesian policies.”
Taking into consideration recent movements toward nationalizing the banking industry, the medical industry, and the housing market, along with every other aspect of American life, it’s perfectly clear that the Keynesian system of socialization is being followed to the letter K. Comrades, let’s look at more from the same chapter of Stormer’s masterpiece:
Dr. William Wirt, the superintendent of schools from Gary, Indiana, was invited to dinner at the home of a government employee while in Washington to attend a school administrators meeting in September 1933. After dinner, the hostess, Alice Barrows, an employeee of the Department of Education, and other guests disclosed that Communists had infiltrated and taken control of the New Deal. Four of the dinner guests were government employees. The fifth was the Washington representative of Tass, the Soviet news agency. Wirt summarized what was said at the meeting… :
“Brain Trusters insist that the America of Washington, Jefferson, and Lincoln must first be destroyed so that on the ruins they will be able to construct an America after their own pattern. … They wish to put the common man back into the feudal society of the Dark Ages. … I was told they believe that by thwarting our then evident economic recovery they would be able to prolong the country’s destitution until they had demonstrated to the American people that the Government must operate business and commerce. By propaganda they would destroy institutions making long-time capital loans – and then push Uncle Sam into making these loans. Once Uncle Sam becomes our financier he must also follow his money with control and management.”
Hmmm… Amerika 2009, anyone? If I, with my limited knowledge of economic theories, am able to clearly discern through basic logic that the monetary path our current puppet masters have chosen to follow will lead us to a complete debasing of and thus ultimately the ruination of the American dollar, then you can be sure that those socialists in Washington D.C. know it, too. And unless you, Blog Reader, can see this just as plainly, then you must openly confess to being less intelligent than I am. (And that would be a pretty sad admission, because – Lord, help me! – I’m just not that bright.) Let’s get back to the book, my fellow Amerikeynes. On page 272, Mr. Stormer describes the “spend your way to prosperity” concept as “Keynesian.” (Whose theories is our illegal alien in the White House following? Anyone? You there, Billy! Put down that cell phone and answer the question!) And then Mr. Stormer goes on to write:
Not many Americans are comfortable with the ideas of the political arm of the Fabian Society. But as president, John Kennedy appointed 40 members of this political under-world to high government posts.
For example, Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., a Harvard professor and ADA-founder, is Kennedy’s special assistant. In 1947, Schlesinger wrote:
“If socialism … is to preserve democracy it must be brought about step by step in a way which will not disrupt the fabric of custom, law and mutual confidence upon which personal rights depend. That is, the transition must be piecemeal… There seems no inherent obstacle to the gradual advance of socialism in the United States through a series of New Deals. Socialism, then, appears quite practical within this frame of reference, as a long-time proposition. It’s gradual advance might well preserve order and law. … The active agents in effecting the transition will probably be, not the working classes, but some combination of lawyers, business and labor managers, politicians and intellectuals, in the manner of the first New Deal.”
In these three short paragraphs, Schlesinger confirms vividly what good Americans are called right-wing extremists for saying: That the Fabians (gradualists) are socialists; that Keynesian economic policy is the path to socialism; that goals of communism and socialism are essentially the same; that New Deal welfare state proposals whether enacted by Democrats or Republicans are socialistic; that establishment of socialism will result in a curtailment of freedom; that socialism and communism appeal, not to the working class or the poverty stricken masses, but to the “liberal” intellectual, the college professor, and the turncoat businessman.
So there you have it, a short and simple explanation of the basic differences between Marxist and Keynesian economic theories. It’s clear that since Marxism, because of its bloody history, could probably never be forced upon the Americonned People, a different method had to be employed. Through the decades, and regardless of whether they referred to themselves as Conservatives or Progressives (liberals), Republicans or Democrats, Capitalists or Communists, our traitors in high places have surreptitiously followed the path of Keynesian socialism, steering this country there through legislation and judicial rulings. So, now ya know! The names may change, the labels may change, the party in power may change, but the slow march to a socialistic global government remains the same. Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama: Keynesians all!
And the Endgame is this: wreck the American economy and replace the dollar with the “Amero," a new form of money for the planned North American Union (Canada, the U.S., and Mexico). This will move us one step closer to the goal of a world government with a single global monetary system and the end of national sovereignty – a “New World Order.”
As Newsweek magazine boldly proclaimed on its cover recently: “WE ARE ALL SOCIALISTS NOW.” Indeed. But this did not happen by accident nor because free enterprise Capitalism doesn’t work. It happened because unpatriotic Elitists sold us out in an attempt to consolidate power for themselves. And it happened because you, Mr. and Mrs. and Miss and Ms. Amerikeyne, didn’t turn off your TV and wake up to what was happening and vote for strict Constitutionalists (like Ron Paul) to government office. YOU voted for Socialism instead of The American Way. Good goin’! In this country, ya gets what ya votes for!
In closing, I want to say a few more words about the book I quoted from here:
A lawyer where I work is now leaving the company, and knowing she would soon have considerably more downtime, asked if I would compile a list of recommended books for her to explore. I tailored the list specifically for her, based upon my slight knowledge of her interests, but a few titles which I included, I would have placed on a recommended book list for ANYONE. And one of those publications was NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON: 25 YEARS LATER by John Stormer. Here is how I described the book on her list:
The original 1964 classic on Communism and Liberalism updated [in 1990]. Every bit as relevant today as it was in ’64. It’s comprehensive, thoroughly researched and referenced. Its importance is impossible to overstate… Along with THE CREATURE FROM JEKYLL ISLAND: A SECOND LOOK AT THE FEDERAL RESERVE, it is A MUST-READ! (Be sure you get the updated version with the “25 Years Later” subtitle added.)
But to put it even more forcefully, I will say that, in my opinion, no one’s political education is near complete until he or she has read NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON: 25 YEARS LATER. There is only one political book as good and none better. (Bear in mind when reading it that the first 14 of its 27 chapters were penned in ’64, so a few details in those chapters are no longer in effect. For instance, the Gold Standard has since been utterly abandoned… for obvious, underhanded reasons. So read the original portion of the book with modern changes in mind.)
That’s all, folks!
Goodbye for now, Blog Reader.
Adios forever, America! (You voted yourself to death.)
~ Stephen T. McCarthy
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
